[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)


File: 1743300689508-0.png (273.78 KB, 2632x1456, 1.png)

File: 1743300689508-1.png (43.21 KB, 2716x196, 2.png)

 

Zetkin and Kollontai must be two of the most commonly cited by intellectuals and college students as the supposed basis for "Marxist Feminism", and both explicitly rejected it lol.

File: 1743301159283-0.png (24.44 KB, 300x250, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1743301159283-1.png (764.88 KB, 1280x720, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1743301159283-2.png (508.41 KB, 634x428, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1743301159283-3.png (4.44 MB, 1339x2035, ClipboardImage.png)

three feminists are in a mexican standoff

1 is a neoliberal
1 is a maoist
1 is a dworkinite

they are fighting each other over the question of whether cishet moids should change diapers, and if so, how many?

"cishet moids should change 100% of the diapers" says the neoliberal "to make up for centuries of patriarchy by taking a subservient place in capitalist society"

"cishet moids should change 50% of diapers" says the maoist, "so they can hold up their half of the sky"

"cishet moids should change 0% of diapers" says the Dworkinite "because men are savage rapists who cannot be trusted around offspring"

after a moment of deliberation, the Dworkinite and the Neoliberal shoot the Maoist for being a centrist

>>2203701
>Zetkin and Kollontai must be two of the most commonly cited by intellectuals and college students as the supposed basis for "Marxist Feminism", and both explicitly rejected it lol.
>Read your pictures
>Its Zetkin and Kollontai saying bourgoies feminism is shit and that you need economic emancipation of women to have female emancipation in any meaningfull sense of the word.
>You know, the entire core concept of what differentiates marxist feminism from other kinds of feminism.

OP did you drop out in kindergarten? Anyone with any degree of reading comprehension can see that they are attacking "feminism" in the sense of the movement that existed at the time, which was exclusively bourgoies feminism, and posit a marxist position against it. You even yourself say that their work is the >BASIS< for marxist feminism. Logically, if their work was the foundation, it did not exist as a term or concept before, so of course they're not going to say "we are marxist feminists" when that distinction was only formalized later in history based on their foundational works. Words can mean different things in different contexts and times.

>>2204134
>>Its Zetkin and Kollontai saying bourgoies feminism is shit and that you need economic emancipation of women to have female emancipation in any meaningfull sense of the word.
>>You know, the entire core concept of what differentiates marxist feminism from other kinds of feminism.
<see it's feminism even though they never called it that!
you never lose huh

this is the kind of retard who thinks when lenin says shit like "bourgeois electoralism" there must then be "proletarian electoralism" LMFAO

>>2205542
<see it's feminism even though they never called it that!
If it was advocating for the emancipation of women from patriarchy then it was feminism. Do you unironically believe Zetkin and Kollontai were in favour of patriarchy?

>>2205542
uh lenin doesn't say "bourgeois electoralism"

>>2205581
>If it was advocating for the emancipation of women from patriarchy then it was feminism
dont expect this level of intellectual development from these people

File: 1743517462546.png (12.94 KB, 220x220, ClipboardImage.png)


>>2205542
>"proletarian electoralism"
it's called democratic centralism, buddy

Will there be TTD?

>>2205581
Feminists will literally read a text where theorists criticize feminism as insufficient to liberate women and respond "they are feminist actually because feminism is when you support women's liberation."

>>2203701
>shitty microblog post
Go to /siberia/ or something, jfc.

>>2205854
>feminism is when you support women's liberation
Yes, that's literally the definition. Kollontai and Zetkin were simply writing at a time before the distinction between bourgeois and proletarian feminism had been articulated in those terms. Lenin also refers to himself as a social democrat in some of his earlier works because he was writing at a time when the distinction between social democrats and communists hadn't been established. It would be silly to insist that he was a social democrat in the modern sense because of this. Terminology changes over time.

>>2206388
that shut them up

>>2205854
>criticize feminism as insufficient to liberate women
If you knew anything about feminism you'd realize it's mostly women arguing that other women's interpretation of feminism is insufficient to liberate women

And thusly Kollontai and Zetkin birthed Marxist feminism

Fucking dumbass


Dumb semantics thread.

>>2206622
>If you knew anything about feminism you'd realize it's mostly women arguing that other women's interpretation of feminism is insufficient to liberate women
hence >>2203709


Unique IPs: 15

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]