>>2586792I have no issue with people using anecdotal experience as a support for a larger argument. It personalizes the speaker, gives a concrete example and help ties them to an audience. But as you pointed out some people take that too far and then point towards the anecdote as THE argument and evidence in-itself.
The anecdote in particular should not be used in countries that don't have socialism because there was no successful revolution that happened. Meaning the standpoint of everyone from that country doesn't have experience of the thing they are arguing about. Then it becomes the blind leading the blind.
Theory on the other hand is like a walking stick so the blind people will have something to help keep them from drowning in a river. If the theory is correct then the lack of experience with revolution is limited in importance.
>>2586805>are all simply liberal reforms with no real positive effect on the working class?They have a positive impact if they force capitalists to give more to the working class than before. In practice though it just moves workers around in a zero sum way with the disadvantage of deepening division. If someone gets fired and they see that their replacement got hired simply because of their identity it will anger most. It also reinforces the imposed identity of the person fired funny enough. After all they got fired specifically for their identity.