>>2571693I seriously doubt your claim is correct, and you have to prove your claim. I do not have to prove it wrong. That's how proof works. If I make a claim like "I have 10 legs" I have to prove that claim, nobody else has to disprove it. But what's the use of appealing to the "characteristics" of another country's socialism? America has gone through struggles to recognize the rights of gay people and those struggles should not be reversed and gay workers should not be ostracized from communism. You say you are against "idpol" but being against idpol means being both against the liberal forms of idpol, which is interclass, and the reactionary forms of idpol, which seek to scapegoat groups and excommunicate them on the basis of their identity, which is exactly what Haz does with gay people when he claims they are imperialist by default.
>>2571697>There is no serious communist movement in the west lmao.OK then that's a problem we have to fix. but earlier you said the ACP has "decent" economic positions, but they don't. They accept landlords into their "communist" party. You have yet to say what is "decent" about that. Meanwhile you said you don't care if he scapegoats gay people, but there's a difference between rejecting liberal idpol, and being indifferent to the reactionary act of scapegoating people on the basis of their identity alone. He's not even going exclusively after bourgeois gay people, he's just claiming that all gay people are bourgeois. that is just as heinous as claiming all people of a certain race or religion are bourgeois. It objectively is idpol, and if you do not reject it, then that means you accept certain forms of idpol, namely the reactionary, discriminatory and scapegoating forms of it. Marxism is also materialist, and not religious, so you "not giving a shit" that a self described "commuist" party is dragging the communism through the mud and confusing people about what communism is seems fishy to me. You say you don't care because "there is no REAL communism in the west" but you simultaneously defend ACP revisionism and landlordism as "decent." That is suspicious!
>Because Communist parties have always been built on the back of class traitor bourgiousie. PrePost too long. Click here to view the full text.