>>2581680>It’s really not.Well it seems to be, i didn't bring in any personal arguments, it was you who brought up ego and whatever else. Unless you're saying it's my tone that brings in the ego, but I would say that's more of a you issue.
>The things that are supposed to prove I implied Marx and Engels cannot stand on their own and requires lenin.It makes sense you don't understand. Im simply saying that it is Lenin and the Bolsheviks that popularized and made Marxism historically relevant, in actual history. They were only able to do this because Marxism is correct, independently of them. Hope that cleared up the situation.
>Oh it’s not baseless in the slightest. You can go check right now even, and you’ll get that response, I guarantee it. There is no projection here, you literally just said something 4channer tier. And even by itself, it is such an empty response, you’re lucky I even bothered to address it this seriously.Idk I haven't been on 4chan in years, from what I remember they'd mostly just talk about how Marxism is a jewish thing, idk where this idea of yours comes from that 4channers are Leninists, or that they would say that the pontification of "real" or "actual" socialism is idealism, or how this 4chan comparison is relevant and not just more cope
<Not muh "real" socialism>What the fuck am I going to do with this?Reflect on how your arguments are basic and dumb?
>Oh no sweetheart, that’s not itBut you did say that, which implied that you don't believe it was real socialism (that's what actual socialism means)
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.