[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / wiki / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru / zine ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
Required: 2 + 2 =

Join our Matrix Chat <=> IRC: #leftypol on Rizon
leftypol archives

| Catalog | Home
|

 No.742065[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

This thread is for feedback related to administration and management. For technical issues use >>>/tech/6724
Dispute bans using the ban appeal form or >>>/meta/
Search the catalog before starting a new thread to avoid duplicates: https://www.leftypol.org/leftypol/catalog.html
An FAQ including formatting and style guide and simplified rules can be found here: https://leftypol.org/faq.html & https://leftypol.org/rules.html

Old welcome topic saved at: >>>/leftypol_archive/498099

Read This Before Posting:
If this is your first visit, lurk for a while before posting. /leftypol/ is an imageboard for non-sectarian leftist political discussion. The staff aims to allow everything within these bounds. To that end there are some critical rules (for /leftypol/):
* No Spam
* No New Threads for Topics with an existing General thread (e.g. USA politics, COVID-19, online personalities, etc.)
* No Reactionary or Identity Politics
* No Explicit Images including Porn without spoiler warning
Low quality threads are subject to be anchored or locked at volunteers discretion.
More detailed rules, and rules governing staff can be found in the /leftypol/ Constituion PDF (attached)
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
336 posts and 49 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.1786757

>>1785282
The who
The what

 No.1796181

File: 1710591136640-0.png (915.41 KB, 1080x915, 108078_original.png)

File: 1710591136640-1.png (968.33 KB, 755x1280, 108458_original.png)

File: 1710591136640-2.png (1.34 MB, 1080x801, 108651_original.png)

File: 1710591136640-3.png (787.5 KB, 800x599, 108871_original.png)

https://tov-anton.livejournal.com/15642.html (russian)

Red Khmers' brochure "democratic Cambodia moves forward"

Immediately after the seizure of political power, the working class assumed technical power. A new generation of workers and working women is being born, consisting of young people, fighters of the Revolutionary Army, people from the peasant poor and the middle classes. They are endowed with a deep love for the people, the Motherland and the Revolution, and a high spirit of collectivism. They are armed with a revolutionary position of independence, sovereignty and independence, tempered over five years of the people's national liberation war. At the current stage of the revolution, they put their collectivism, their perseverance, their enthusiasm and their creative spirit in the service of national defense and creation.

While the communes of agricultural production are mobilizing all their efforts to solve the water problem, to modernize and develop agriculture, workers' collective trade unions are concentrating their efforts on repairing damaged factories, restoring factories completely destroyed by the war and increasing industrial production. This production is put at the service of modernizing agriculture, improving the living conditions of the workers and peasants, and strengthening national independence and sovereignty.

Under the neocolonial regime, before liberation, factories were equipped with imported equipment, and spare parts and raw materials depended on foreigners. The machines were rarely operated by citizens. Now a new generation of workers in Democratic Kampuchea has fully taken over the operation of all factories, which from now on supplied spare parts, as well as raw materials produced in the country. At the same time, under the slogan "Do everything possible to quickly increase the quantity and quality of products while spending less", workers' unions have built new factories, restored and improved existing equipment and introduced new production methods that increase productivity while reducing cost.



 No.1574396[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

Leftypedia lived - Leftypedia lives - Leftypedia will live!

Greetings, comrades. Leftypedia, the radical encyclopedia, should be back in a usable state. We have more moderators, which will help with spam from now on, and images are slowly being repopulated for your viewing pleasure. The new domain has been up and running for a while at https://wiki.leftypol.org, and we've imported the vast majority of content that was on the old site while adding a lot of new stuff. I hope that Anons can come back and fill in any content that was lost.

For those unaware, Leftypedia is an original /leftypol/ project dedicated to combating the disinformation of mainstream media and academic sources, as well as discussing leftist history, theory, and practice from a multi-sectarian viewpoint. We welcome additions from different leftist perspectives provided that they are properly sourced and well argued. In addition, we maintain a separate space, tentatively titled "Essays", for more subjective or polemic work.

The original thread is here: >>>/edu/3780
You can find Leftypedia at: https://wiki.leftypol.org
Help for new editors: https://wiki.leftypol.org/wiki/Leftypedia:Community_portal
143 posts and 18 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.1791631

So if the only source I can find for a data point is audio, like a 45 min lecture, is it possible to upload it to a specific page after converting to ogg or whatever?

 No.1791905

>>1791631
Yep, should work! OGG, MP3, probably others too. See if it works for ya:
https://wiki.leftypol.org/wiki/Special:Upload
I will add that YouTube embeds are also a newly restored feature that, I'm told, should be easy to use.



File: 1695067374087.jpg (100.6 KB, 1071x703, Benito_Reading.jpg)

 No.1601511[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

Glasses edition.

The Purpose of This Thread
I've seen about a dozen threads asking about Fascists: "Why are they like this?" "What is Fascism?" "Is Fascism Far Right?" "Is the modern KPRF Fascist?" "Why do laymen Nazis hate America?" "How did Hitler organize the Nazis?" "What does /leftypol/ think of <insert random Fascist here>"

These repetitive threads get a lot of attention and people end up retreading the same few questions, so I figured I'd make a general for all questions and inquiries into Fascism. Consider it a study group for a niche subject. Whether it be out of genuine curiosity or means of countering Fascist ideology, I'm hoping people can point to this thread instead of starting new ones or bumping a dozen different old ones.

Links and Fascist Literature
>Biblioteca Fascista
https://bibliotecafascista.blogspot.com/
<Collection of translated articles from Italian Fascists, useful as a historical source.

>Fascism: One Hundred Questions Asked and Answered

https://ia804600.us.archive.org/11/items/fascism-100-questions-asked-answeredoswald-mosley/Oswald%20Mosley%20-%20Fascism%20100%20Qs%20and%2010%20Points.pdf
<Pamphlet written by Oswald Mosley. It was famous enough that Fascist parties in other countries imitated it. He outlines in detail the British interpretation of the Fascist Political and Economic system.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
563 posts and 205 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.1797509

>>1601573
>I think it was CPUSA who said something akin to, the ludicrous obvious bullshitting of neo-nazis makes them obvious, but the actual classical fascists (as few and far between as they are) would make a much more powerful threat.
this post?

 No.1797678

>>1796647
>I strongly suspect that part of this too is because these right-wing communists would be alt-right guys but can't because many of them are not white, but alienated diaspora kids from socially conservative families, and they suffer from ressentiment toward white people (and the alt-right types who excluded them), and they're also too online and being bamboozled by right-wing propaganda (of which there's a lot of money sloshing around in promoting), and white liberals are an easy target to beat up on as way to let out that mix of frustration and envy, and because the white liberals are politically correct and can't just be, like, we're going to deport your ass. But they sometimes cross the wires wrong like Sameera Khan singling out a white southern girl who likes to go hunting and fishing for her ire, I don't know if you saw that (but I don't think she considers herself a communist). In other words, they're a bundle of contradictions.
That is a hot take. White liberals get beat up on because their racism is passive aggressive most of the time and is not blatant like conservatives. They are our "allies" but in reality they do not have much of a high opinion of us and would stab us in the back if we do not check them. I could be incorrent but didn't you come from a liberal background because the tone from your post gives that impression. The arrogance to assume that we are "envious" of white people reflect yourself more than whatever patsoc image you have.

 No.1798148

Thought this was an interesting read from the Fascio Substack

https://fascio.substack.com/p/the-fascist-and-bolshevik-overlap

The Fascist and Bolshevik Overlap
>Communism and Fascism, typically seen as polar opposites on the ideological spectrum, reveal unexpected similarities when examining Italian Fascism and Soviet Communism. Both regimes faced significant challenges, and their diplomatic interactions, particularly the economic and non-aggression pacts between Italy and the Soviet Union in the early 1930s, highlight a strategic partnership that transcended ideological divides. This collaboration, motivated by diplomatic isolation and the pursuit of strategic advantages, suggests that ideological adherence can be secondary to political and economic interests. The recognition of practical parallels between Stalinism and Fascism, coupled with ᴉuᴉlossnW's admiration for Soviet methods, breaks conventional categorizations. The mutual influence and acknowledgment between these regimes challenge the simplistic binary of left versus right, pointing to a nuanced interplay of ideas that could bridge ideological gaps for pragmatic purposes.

[…]

>Upon assuming the role of editor for the socialist publication Avanti! in December 1912, ᴉuᴉlossnW brought on board a diverse group of contributors, including anarchists and staunch Marxists like Angelica Balabanoff, who served as his deputy editor. The editorial team, including Paolo Orano and syndicalists such as Sergio Panunzio, significantly influenced the paper's socialist orientation. ᴉuᴉlossnW didn't stop there; he went on to launch and oversee Utopia from November 1913 until the end of 1914. This periodical became a gathering place for influential young socialists and syndicalist thinkers, playing a crucial role in shaping ᴉuᴉlossnW's ideological journey. In the years leading up to World War I, a number of syndicalists, Panunzio and Ottavio Dinale among them, viewed warfare as a means of societal progression. These figures, along with ᴉuᴉlossnW, advocated for Italy's military involvement in conflicts like the 1911 battle for Libya against the Ottomans and later in World War I.


>This period marked a significant shift as many socialists transiti
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

 No.1799074

>>1798148
>“Stalinism and Fascism, despite a deep difference in social foundations, are symmetrical phenomena. In many of their features they show a deadly similarity. A victorious revolutionary movement in Europe would immediately shake not only fascism, but Soviet Bonapartism.”
<— Leon Trotsky, The Revolution Betrayed: What Is the Soviet Union And Where Is It Going?
Trotskyists still promote this idea in their ranks. But to me this is the political contradiction within communism itself, with the right being stalinists and the left, anti-stalinists of all colours; trotskyists, anarchists and so on. Stalin's absorption into the contemporary russian national consciousness and lenin's total sidelining show this attitude too. Stalin is not a "communist", he is a nationalist, as per his legacy.
>"There is one difference [between communism and fascism]. You arrive at this conclusion through the concept of classes, and we come to it through the concept of the nation.”
<— Benito ᴉuᴉlossnW quoted in ᴉuᴉlossnW and The Legacy of Revolutionary Socialism by Domenico Settembrini
I would say this is extremely relevant too. But here we must be dialectical by positing *qualitative* distinction (as opposed to a quantitative one). The primacy of a political "idea" here matters more than its outcomes. But this to me also smashes the communist concept of a materialist politics, since the left understand well that its not right to give oneself to fascist concessions no matter how self-serving they may be. So politics has its principle in a higher meaning than self-sufficiency.

 No.1799076

>>1799074
Kerry Bolton, a national socialist has also written a book before praising stalin and his great purge as a protection of his nation against more """international""" actors like trotsky and co.



File: 1710700670405-0.png (1.15 MB, 943x1201, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1710700670405-1.png (886.63 KB, 853x1280, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1710700670405-2.png (1.87 MB, 1824x1139, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1710700670405-3.png (1.78 MB, 1147x1206, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1710700670405-4.mp4 (723.29 KB, 1280x720, dave-glados.mp4)

 No.1797117[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

369 posts and 87 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.1799046

>>1799044
pro: good, anti: bad

 No.1799048

>>1799044
Me when arguing with russian liberals

 No.1799049

>>1799044
In all seriousness, whether it's the 'cross and sickle' or 'neoliberal nazi stormtrooper', it's evidence that capitalism or liberalism are not dividing the world by democracy but in fact combining left and right by stimulating national antagonisms.

 No.1799052

>>1799044
brainworms

 No.1799075

File: 1710856685210-0.jpg (425.54 KB, 677x1280, 17108557978990.jpg)

File: 1710856685210-1.jpg (197.64 KB, 1280x767, 17108557978991.jpg)

File: 1710856685210-2.jpg (247.1 KB, 1000x667, 17108557979013.jpg)

Ukraine is a country of crybullying forever 13 year olds



 No.1650427[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

This thread is for the discussion of cybersocialism, the planning of the socialist economy by computerized means, including discussions of related topics and creators. Drama belongs in /isg/

Reading
Towards a New Socialism by Paul Cockshott and Allin Cottrell: http://ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu/~cottrell/socialism_book/
Brain of the Firm by Stafford Beer
Cybernetic Revolutionaries by Eden Medina
Cybernetics: Or the Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine and The Human Use of Human Beings (1st edition) by Norbert Wiener
Economic cybernetics by Nikolay Veduta
People's Republic of Walmart by Leigh Phillips and Michal Rozworski
Red Plenty by Francis Spufford
Economics in kind, Total socialisation and A system of socialisation by Otto Neurath (Incommensurability, Ecology, and Planning: Neurath in the Socialist Calculation Debate by Thomas Uebel provides a summary)

Active writers/creators
Sorted by last name
>Paul Cockshott
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
466 posts and 67 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.1796783

>>1796233
>machines are not subjects. it is rather the bourgeoisie that act through the machinery, which thus seems to have a will of its own
Actually the machine represents dead labour materialised in fixed capital. The machine is *undead*, such is marx's apt vampire analogy. So the movement of the machine is the self-movement of labour as a social substance - this is also part of why machines cant create Value, because they *are* Value itself, in transposition (the same way all products of society are).

 No.1797003

>>1796779
>it's the workers that control machines
do they? if the workers decide to start using the machines for their own purpose rather than the machines' owners' purpose, what happens then? sure the workers "control" the machines in the most base sense. but as far as the relations of production are concerned, it is the bourgeoisie that controls the workers, and the machines are a mere appendage of the bourgeoisie/capital
it may be tempting to for example believe that a thermostat controls the temperature of a room, but it doesn't. I control the thermostat, and therefore I control the temperature of the room
>>1796783
I am well aware that machines are dead labour

 No.1799060

Anyone read Fully Automated Luxury Communism by Aaron Bastani? could be a useful read.

 No.1799061

>>1799060
>could be a useful read
How so. The thread is about how to do economic planning. If productivity of making X is high enough, there is no need to carefully plan how to use X responsibly. If productivity of making just about anything is high enough, there is no point to economic planning anymore. From what I heard about Bastani's book, it just postulates such a scenario will happen, without any basis.

 No.1799072

>>1799061
I've not heard that before.
It's a reading suggestion, and am looking for others opinions, thanks.



File: 1707148606810.png (291.47 KB, 485x436, 1623078444647.png)

 No.1751299[Reply]

>For Reagan not only saw communists as parricides, but also as extremely active sexually-completely in contrast to the actual sexual code in most communist countries. For instance, when he ran for Governor of California, one of the central themes of his campaign was “the mess at Berkeley,” a place where, he said, they held “sexual orgies so vile I can-not describe them to you,” promising if elected to “investigate the charges of communism and blatant sexual misbehavior on the Berkeley campus.” A good part of the reason why he was elected was that, as one biographer put it, “hidden away in the hearts of parents was the fear that their own children might one day go away to college, grow beards and march against authority.”… Reagan promised these voters that his first targets as Governor would be the students at Berkeley, “advocates of sexual orgies, drug usage, and filthy speech,” who wanted only to “disrupt the academic community” and who therefore must be brought under control immediately. The situation at Berkeley, he told a woman’s club in April of 1966, was now so bad that their “morality gap is so great that we can no longer ignore it.” He had proof, he said, that the Alameda County District Attorney had just investigated a student dance which had turned into “an orgy,” where they had displayed on a giant screen “pictures of men and women, nude, in sensuous poses, provocative, fondling.” Since Reagan had waved a piece of paper in the air during the speech, saying that he had the report of the DA’s investigation “in his hand,” curious reporters later asked the DA for a copy, only to be told that “my office made no investigations of the college dance.” - Lloyd deMause, "REAGAN’S AMERICA"

You can even see this sort of mentality in people like Ben Shapiro who conflate communism, socialism, and "the left" with rebellion against all authority and goodness for the sake of mindless pleasure. Not to mention the endless obsession with LGBTQ+, qanon pedophile theories, porn, abortion, etc.

What is the actual materialist explanation for the right wing obsession with sex? Does porky get some sort of benefit from everyone being a heterosexual monogamous who goes to church once a week? if not why the backlash? is it just to ensure a constant supply of new workers?
31 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.1798945

>>1751299
>Does porky get some sort of benefit from everyone being a heterosexual monogamous
more children = more reserve labor

>who goes to church once a week?

The church serves as a substitute for welfare and offers a way for people to socialize in an environment that's otherwise heavily regulated. Part of it is also the enduring influence that religion had before the colonial era, particularly in places like Europe where the Catholic Church was effectively in charge or the United States where settlers were organized by Protestant sects.

>why the backlash [against sex]?

As stupid as it is, lots of people just hate sex. They aren't asexual, which is a perfectly legitimate reason to dislike sex; rather, they're heterosexual men and women who have been taught to hate sex. Places like the United States have abysmal sex ed, where young adults are told to shut up and repress anything they feel rather than sit down and talk about it or engage with it in a healthy way; this leads to revulsion as they grow older, and repeat the cycle down the line.

For conservatives in particular, being anti-sex is a great way to control people. They can tap into the sexual repression I mentioned above and claim moral depravity if someone has sex, which is very effective fuel for outrage culture and offers an easy answer to problems in society.

 No.1798946

File: 1710835357132.png (455.24 KB, 647x815, ClipboardImage.png)

>>1752191
>Sex belongs solely to humans; it is alien to the Divine.
are you telling me that when I die I don't get to have sex with demon girls

 No.1799023

File: 1710841548777.png (216.28 KB, 1789x433, 1708955468090.png)

>>1751299
Here you go, anon.

 No.1799070

>>1752191
This is only true in monotheism whose priesthood is usually made up of eunuchs and people who are generally disgusted by their bodies (philosophers), like paul who says that even to have a wife is sinful and implies that procreation is actually the "original sin" that mankind is bound in (an ode to the early christian gnostics).
Pagan religion is incomparable, even though all human cultures generally attempt to guard the concept of sexual modesty (which freud explicates in "totem and taboo" is the first act of restriction that enters man properly into civilisation by disbanding the sexual monopoly of "the primal father [kronos] by arranging marriages thereafter for the sake of peacekeeping).

 No.1799071

File: 1710854009929.jpg (48.09 KB, 540x656, 255.jpg)

>What is the actual materialist explanation for the right wing obsession with sex?
Jouissance. Taboo creates the "surplus enjoyment" of denial, politically with the public-private distinction, which leftists erode this by publicising sexual identity and relations.
Ive already made the point before too about the jouissance of homophobia arising from a constitutive homoeroticism, by emptying the signifier of activity from its anunciation (but by formalising relations you disperse what you [didnt] have by refraction - like how you fall into a relationship, you dont one day say that youre bf and gf, thats anti-social). Youre allowed to be "gay" by not being gay, thats why there are no publicly gay athletes or soldiers, because homoeroticism barrs the autonomy of this identity through enjoying it's coded placation.
Think for example too of the whole "trap" phenomenon. The womanly image sustains an "excess" through her male sex, which is the "enjoyment" of her condition, and this is also why MtF transhumanists who get their cocks cut off lose all of their appeal, because they are caught within the constitution of a contradiction which gives meaning to their character.
So the conservative enjoyment is in this pre-political relation of the informal sexual excess, where leftists usually want to bring this into formality, thus creating political autonomy but losing the qualitative excess.
This is the same divide political between femboys and transhumanists. One is allowed to have this discursive excess of being a boy while appearing as a girl, while the other has identified with the cause of their subjectivity and so lost their mystique.



File: 1608680964250.png (23.67 KB, 973x819, PRC.png)

 No.211384[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

493 posts and 90 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.1798588

>>1798088
This "wargame" was literally a gigantic ad, paid for by the manufacturers of missiles like JASM and LRASM (which are given abilities like anti-ship capability that they lack in real life). Not coincidentally, the conclusion they end with is "buy our new missiles". The requirement to end the scenario in that way is the original sin from which the rest of its mistakes flow. A fine example of capitalism corroding cognition once again.

 No.1798811

>>1798588
IRL DLC

 No.1798886

>>1798293
If you're not aware that CHAIRMAN XI is sending Chinese spy balloons to airstrike innocent unsuspecting Grindr users on US soil you're just a homophobic bigot. Vote blue more.

 No.1799063

It would be better that americans ban tiktok instead of using it to get sensitive information from users.

 No.1799069

>>1799063
You know damn well they want to have Zukerburg to control Tiktok so that way that fucker can sell off that information to the NSA. But if the US does Ban Tiktok well that is one less source we can try and get the truth out from the propaganda.



File: 1651015581675.png (447.04 KB, 400x649, spectacle.png)

 No.941093[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

A thread focused on discussing the parasocial relationships cultivated by the Almighty Algorithm to generate profit off of our atomization and society's hyper-normalization of petty internet drama.
Brace through the hyperreal lacanian void together with the Leftypol Twitter account: https://twitter.com/leftypol_org

Reminder That None of This Is Real!
ɢʀᴀʙ ᴀ ᴘᴀɪʀ ᴏꜰ sᴘᴇᴄᴛᴀᴄʟᴇs

—————————————————–

CORE THEORY
>The Society of the Spectacle (1967) by Guy Debord
📖 • https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/debord/society.htm
📺 • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0blWjssVoUQ

<The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction (1936) by Walter Benjamin

📖 • https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/benjamin.htm
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
494 posts and 118 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.1798977

>>1798812
Succinct and precise

 No.1798993

File: 1710838385684-0.png (134.67 KB, 1856x569, 3420.png)

File: 1710838385684-1.png (154.09 KB, 1849x206, 3421.png)

>>1798960
You got psyop'd hard.

 No.1799059

File: 1710845259309.jpg (84.57 KB, 960x720, 1710844222898281.jpg)

why did Roza Shanina do this bros?

 No.1799067

File: 1710850282260.png (20.66 KB, 409x217, sdgsfd.png)

The thermonuclear trvthnvke that saved mankind

 No.1799073

>>1799059
It's based when we do it unironically get fucked.



File: 1710785185567-0.png (248.52 KB, 636x335, protest.PNG)

File: 1710785185567-1.png (1.8 MB, 1133x629, WTO protests.PNG)

 No.1798029[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

Under a popular front for issues such as drug decriminalization / legalization, opposing corporate interests, opposing bad government policies, antifascist demonstrations and many other single-issue politics - is marching alongside liberals viable?

A prime example of such a case would be the 1999 Seattle WTO protests. And the point of it is often not to endorse liberal reformism or even more pointless voting - but to be used as a means of spreading propaganda and solidarity among the working class. More recent examples would be the 2023 French pension reform protests, the Framers' protests in all of Europe, the 2021 Brazilian protests and thousands upon thousands more.

A leftcom Bordigist for example would oppose such activities as antifascism in general, because of these features of influencing the broader masses (including liberals) which are dubbed as class-collaboration and denounced.

It ultimately also becomes a debate of big-tent organizing and secular puritanism.

I also made this thread to mention the upcoming protest in Bulgaria - Sofia called 'Use is not Under the influence of' (Протест - "Употреба" не е "въздействие") which seeks to protest against the unjust laws that have come through the infamous american so called War on Drugs. The bulgarian people have been getting arrested and facing prison time for up to 8 years for possesing one joint. The protest against such laws however is mostly driven by liberals. Although I have heard that some Anarchists from the organizations of FAB (Federation of Anarchists in Bulgaria) & The Bulgarian Prisoners' Association will also likely be attending. The anarchist faction does not attend hoping to change things through voting or reforms, but rather seeks to spread awareness about the sort of police brutality that is enacted onto victimless crimes.

Is all of it worth it? Has it yielded any results, historically speaking?
97 posts and 10 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.1798825

>>1798029
Love u

 No.1798850

Lmao, i guarantee the moment most blatant rightoids fash ghouls will add "put whatever shit you want that makes your brain short circuit" into their program - all leftism of those dopamine button monkeys will disappear.

 No.1798852

woa i did not think bringing up that hakim bey was a pedophile rapist would make this happen. anyway OP, communists should always enter coalitions with clear short term and long term strategic goals in mind, and while maintaining the independence of the organization in question. its the flipside of the issue where communists orgs try to absorb movements by disguising their aims/infiltrating the leadership, but it has the same effect of fucking up clarity and discipline. its fine to enter into coalitions with any number and type of interest groups so long as it does not compromise the independence and integrity of the communist org in question. in the context of the US, that means its fine for a communist gun club to hold joint events with an NRA chapter if the latter is willing. in most cases the latter wont be willing because just short of all NRA chapters are also deeply anticommunist, and most are generally reactionary. if an NRA chapter was somehow willing to do joint events, but the leadership and/or many members were vocally and/or materially supporting reactionary causes, it would endanger the integrity of the communist gun club to work with them. if however a single chapter of the NRA was for the most part genuinely a single issue group, it wouldnt only be fine but absolutely should be done, with transparency and good faith.

the same goes for liberals, who will much more often have orgs and events in which coalitions with liberals are favorable. abortion rights, drug decriminalization, housing reform, etc., are all great examples. but as soon as these compromise the independence and integrity of the communists involved, they need to be avoided. its funny though, in most cases where this happen the communists join up with liberals thinking that theyre infiltrating or evangelizing, but then unsurprisingly once they become invested & friendly its the entryists that get converted to liberalism. "communists do not disguise their aims" isnt an ethical statement, its a pragmatic one

 No.1799065

Oh whoopsie
Cleaned the thread

 No.1799066

>>1798672
>doing psychonalaysis on annonymous posters online
Well funny story about that



File: 1710788389826.png (369.45 KB, 583x434, 1575738465051.png)

 No.1798120[Reply]

Been seeing leftoids trying to rally against expropriations on social media. Why would communists rally to defend a property-owning section of society from being expropriated? Communism is the movement of the entirely propertyless mass of proletarians, it's not their job to aid property owners from attempting to preserve or retrieve their property.
9 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.1798288


 No.1798998

>>1798120
Sauce?

 No.1799029

<on social media
And by that I assume twitter / reddit / some other coreweb site. Sounds like a you problem.

 No.1799051

>>1798161
Not sure what this is even about but
that's a bingo

 No.1799054

Tiktok
expropriation
Came here specifically to tell us how he doesn't care
Yeah you're a simpleton OP
get better



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / wiki / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru / zine ]
Previous [ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 / 30 / 31 / 32 / 33 / 34 / 35 / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home