>I'm not talking about 19th century race science, I'm talking about genetics. All I say is that 19th century race science largely broadly got the main "races" or populations largely correct in terms of genetic groupings. I don't think anything else is relevant from 19th century race science at all.They didn't though, and it massively set us back in term of ancestral study.
>In how animals behave, think, instincts etc.This is relative to an even larger degree to their physical morphology and the behavior that results from how they must use it (How does a bat think?)
>The only reason subspecies category isn't used in humans is ideological reasons. Again, Why does one deer that has a white tail, yet in almost every other way the exact same deer on the other side of the valley a different "sub species" yet this doesn't relate to humans when dogs and wolves have a smaller genetic drift than between human ethnicities? It usually isn't. in fact, multiple animals aren't "subspecies" anymore because of the fact that they don't have enough genetic differentiation. Dogs and wolves are a bad comparison because of how generally applicable "dog" is, but in short, humans barely even compare in regards to Fst.
>No, this is how your westoid brain thinks because Westerners seemingly can only view history through their own lens. Dude, you're a westerner. You wouldn't link what you have if you weren't, and if you aren't its even more pathetic.
>My argument is actually more akin to the prime directive of Star Trek. Aboriginals, Polynesians, Native Americans etc should have been left alone and differences in how ethnicitiers actually adapated and viewed the world, could be taken in account when crafting policies designed to help people or improve social cohesion.They aren't alone though, they're within and operating through society. This "prime directive" shit is even more patronizing, it comes off as some kind of western liberal who thinks that X or Y is incapable for a given group, ignoring the centuries of oppression applied to them.
>Genes relating to exactly how we think >rs708913(a) found broadly in Europeans and Asians, not broadly found in Africans >rs2099744(a) found broadly in EuroPost too long. Click here to view the full text.