>>2573758>I do not, nookay, so why should i talk to you if you dont believe in democracy (rule of the people) on a supposedly left-wing board? you dont appear to believe in anything anyway.
>It still doesn't negate the fact that organized labour prevents the reduction of wages.is it possible to raise the minimum wage to $1,000,000 an hour? if not, why not?
>Not reallyokay, so again, you are forcing the ultimatum that one must either unconditionally support mass immigration or they are hitler.
>Where am I being deceptive?does marx say that mass immigration lowers the economic and moral condition of the native working class? yes or no?
>is it?you should know since you said marx was wrong. more lowly deception.
>What is exactly pathetic about what I said? because youre a coward who both feigns ignorance but also have an implicit dogma. is mass immigration good or bad? i say bad, because its caused by imperialism and has a bad effect on national labour, inciting reactionary sentiments and chauvinism, which cannot be overcome since the two boxes available is either a blind support for capital or hitlerism. i am the one attempting to break the dichotomy by showing the irrationality of both. why would i hate an immigrant for doing what is in their self-interest? equally, why would i support millions of people being forced to lower the standard of living because they are profitable to a few capitalists? common sense cannot abide by these terms, so i dont accept them. lets be honest, the "debate" is retarded because no one wants to listen to each other. im trying to gauge the signals from the right-wing communists on this board to set the terms, and its all over the place, cos no one wants to appear irrational, but thats what theyre being. i have only suggested that regulation ought to be permitted, and im sidelined as hitler, so help me out here. grow a spine; split the party.