[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / wiki / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru / zine ]

/AKM/ - Guns, weapons and the art of war.

"War can only be abolished through war, and in order to get rid of the gun it is necessary to take up the gun." - Chairman Mao
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
Required: 2 + 2 =

Join our Matrix Chat <=> IRC: #leftypol on Rizon

| Catalog | Home
|

File: 1685048727614-0.png (306.59 KB, 602x371, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1685048727614-2.pdf (198.45 KB, 206x255, F-35 mishap rate.pdf)

 No.3151[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

Thread for hating on the F-35 "Lightning II" stealth turkey a.k.a the most expensive military project in history to date.

The USAF declared it ready for service in 2016
As of that date the following problems I can list just off the top of my head
- Vulnerable to lightning; it's practically a lightning rod https://archive.is/QSIii
- 0 redundancies in the cyber or mechanical aggregates; any malfunction
- RADAR glitches means it literally ahs to be turned off and on again https://archive.ph/EEd9y
- Ejection seat is banned for anyone 136 pounds or below and anyone not above 150 pounds has significant injury risk, it literally can break your neck.
- F-35 helmets glow too brightly for air-to-air refueling https://archive.is/pKE0Y
- F-35 helmets are so heavy at nearly 5 kilograms so that maneuvers cause them to bang their heads on the inside of the cockpit https://archive.ph/WsRxA https://archive.ph/dE1gP
(keep in mind these helmets are 400,000 dollars each).
- The oxygen system is unreliable (something that the F-22 shares) https://archive.ph/kGGKq

The Plane was supposed to be ready by 2010-12 having been projected in the early 2000s
the list of problems in its past and that are remaining in various levels of urgency number over 800.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
99 posts and 43 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.4104

>>4099
the good old "we downgraded our own planes to let the enemy detect them" /k/ope, never not funny

 No.4105

>>4103
Syrian AD is non existent besides S-300 which is incorporated into Russian AD network and does not operate on its own. Every side of the conflict (Israel , US, Russia, Turkey) operates within their own area of operation and any strikes conducted outside of it done with some degree of a coordination between them when appropriate. US and Russia talk. They talk a lot and exchange information on positions of their forces and information on upcoming strikes to avoid the incenses. Same with Israel and Russia. Russia knows before hand when and what Israel is about to strike and Israel knows what areas are of limits for them. There's no direct confrontation between each side and Syria itself is not an actor.

 No.4106

>>4105
>Syrian AD is non existent besides S-300
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
S-200 units have been operating there again for years, Pantsir-S short-range systems, SA-3s and numerous other older Soviet air defense systems are operating other than the S-300. Was the F-117 that got shot down by the Serbs also using Lunburg lenses for some fucking reason? GTFO of here with this denial /k/ope.
>is incorporated into Russian AD network and does not operate on its own
Uh yes it is a seperate network, because otherwise that's an attack on Russian forces without provocation, which is a declaration of war, retard.
>Every side of the conflict (Israel , US, Russia, Turkey) operates within their own area of operation
<This tired nonsense again
Yeah except that Turkey, Israel and the USA regularly violate these agreements and the no-fly zone and attack Syrian government forces that are literally fighting ISIS with air-strikes, which is why Syria responds in turn.
>Russia knows before hand when and what Israel is about to strike
Ah like it did September 17, 2018? And that's Russia's military, not Syria's.
>There's no direct confrontation between each side
>Syria itself is not an actor.
This is a literal contradiction, either its the Russians shooting down Israeli jets and so on and so there IS direct confrontation, OR Syria is an independent actor. Take your pick.

 No.4107

>>4106
I know how things are done there and you don't

 No.4624

File: 1710719323585.pdf (1.42 MB, 197x255, gao-12-437.pdf)

>any malfunction
LOL accidentally deleted the full sentence
"Any malfunction or system failure would result in a catastrophic loss of the plane and possibly the pilot because of the lack in back-up systems.

>the most expensive military project in history to date.

Just to put more source and meaning to this. Back in June of 2012, the Government Accountability Office released a report called “Joint Strike Fighter: DOD Actions Needed to Further Enhance Restructuring and Address Affordability Risks,” in which it stated that the program might cost over $1 trillion to operate by the time it was finished, and at the time of the publication (pdf related) the expenditure on the program was $331.9 billion. Over a decade later and not only is the F-35 at roughly 50% capability, but it's expenditures exceeded the estimates, hitting 1.7 Trillion dollars and the number is rising. That's almost double the expected cost. By comparison the Gerald R. Ford Class Aircraft Carrier, which was developed and put into production in less than half the time period it took to create the F-35 has barely exceeded 40 Billion dollars. How is it that an AIRCRAFT CARRIER PROGRAM is LESS EXPENSIVE than THE STRIKE-FIGHTERS they're supposed to CARRY!? It's a Military-Industrial scam of epic proportions.
https://fee.org/articles/the-f-35-program-failed-to-deliver-working-jets-but-succeeded-in-transferring-hundreds-of-billions-to-contractors/



File: 1710534496881-0.jpeg (81.56 KB, 668x566, F9ptTGuasAACqwJ.jpeg)

File: 1710534496881-1.jpeg (35.42 KB, 946x683, F9ptTtHagAA-wXA.jpeg)

 No.4606[Reply]

https://archive.is/z20SZ
>The F-22 Raptor, the United States’ fifth-generation stealth aircraft designed for breaching enemy air defenses, encountered a formidable adversary in the form of the Korean-made FA-50 fighter jet.
>The most recent encounter of these two aircraft in a combative setting took place in the skies over Luzon, where the FA-50 belonging to the Philippine Air Force [PAF] closely contested the American war jet and even alleged to have achieved a successful “kill” against the F-22. A noticeable surge in defense collaboration occurred between the Philippines and the United States in the year 2023.
>The Philippines, a nation of islands situated in the South China Sea, witnessed the arrival of numerous cutting-edge fighter jets for the first time. The Korean-made FA-50 was reported to have defeated the U.S. Air Force’s F-22 Raptor during the 2023 iteration of the ‘Cope Thunder’ exercise between the U.S. and the Philippines, an event making a comeback after a hiatus of 33 years.
>In a recent journal entry, the Philippine Air Force [PAF] disclosed an unexpected achievement. Notably, the radio was alive with the confident proclamation of a Filipino fighter pilot during an aerial combat exercise with the F-22 Raptor, “Fox 2! Killed one Raptor on the right turn!”
>The journal entry elaborates, “This incident marked a momentous development in military history. The Philippine’s Lead-in Fighter Aircraft triumphed over a 5th generation fighter jet in a simulated court of air combat, which took place in the airspace over Luzon, within the context of the Cope Thunder Exercise.”
2 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.4610

Yeah I heard about this. Though to be fair that training jet isn't exactly a slouch either.

 No.4615

The magic word is "dogfight".
The F-22 is a fifth gen jet designed for long range and beyond visual range attacks using missiles.
In a regualr combat scenario, the F-22 can fire missiles at the FA-50, before even getting detected by radar.
Fifth gen jets regularly lose gun dogfights to fourth gen jets because stealth design and general considerations for BVR engagements reduce the ability to turn fight while being subsonic.
And this is totally irrelevant for combat as the last two decades have seen virtually zero dogfights in jet to jet engagements. The future of jet fighting is slinging missiles at each other over more than 100 km range.

 No.4619

File: 1710692806994.png (616.09 KB, 710x400, ClipboardImage.png)

>>4615
This is retarded. Dogfights absolutely still happen and is both proven in previous wars -from Vietnam to Lebanon - and in modern simulations of a US air-battle with Chinese and Russian air forces
>the last two decades have seen virtually zero dogfights in jet to jet engagements.
The last 2 decades have barely HAD any jet to jet engagements because most air-force activities have been ground attack against under-armed guerillas and terrorists or civilians. However dogfights do occur.
- In Syria an F/A-18 shot down a Su-22
- In India a MiG-21 modernization shot down a Pakistani F-16 and more than one skirmish of this kind has occurred between them.
- During the late 90s Yugoslav and Serbian wars dogfights happened quite often, with MiG-29s and MiG-21s engaging F-16s, Panavia Tornados and other aircraft in close-range combat.
- Russian fighter jets, primarily the Su-35, have shot down drones with auto-cannon fire over Ukraine

Dogfighting was declared dead in the 1960s and Vietnam disproved that, which is why all fighter-jets today still mount autocannons. Dogfights would continue into every conflict of every war after. The first Gulf War had an F-15 engage two MiG-29s and there were a few more close range engagements in that war.

The idea that BVR will end dogfighting is retarded because counter-measures against such missiles will improve with the missiles and never guarantee a hit. This was proven in Iraq when F-15s with AIM-120s failed to shoot down MiG-25s because they simply avoided, out-maneuvered and out speeded the missiles, with the F-15s likewise avoiding the R-40s fired back at them. DFRM and other countermeasures mean Active RADAR seekers are vulnerable to spoofing, Semi-Active missiles force the firing aircraft to reveal its position by actively using RADAR and IR-guidance is primarily used for close range engagements and is vulnerable to flares and decoys.

Finally the F-22 was built specifically to outperform the F-15 Eagle, including in maneuverability and IS more maneuverable than it, so no the excuse of "stealth design and general considerations for BVR engagements reduce the ability to turn fight while being subsonic." is absolutely untrue.

 No.4620

>>4619
Most of what you listed from the last two decades weren't dogfights and all of them are irrelevant border skirmishes.
Dogfights are just beyond irrelevant in real wars like Ukraine, as ground based air defence utterly denies enemy jets ever meeting within visual range. And yes, the F-22 and F-35 regularly lose mock gun fights against F-16 because it is not the role they were designed for.

 No.4622

File: 1710704679136.png (250.37 KB, 640x743, ClipboardImage.png)

>>4620
Yes those were dogfights - close range shoot-outs within visual range, the same applies to Cope Thunder and other previous F-22 involved exercises.
>ground based air defence utterly denies enemy jets ever meeting within visual range
And yet they have, because air-defense is not perfect and counter-measures exist. The primary reason we don't see many air-air battles in Ukraine is because the Ukrainian air-force is operating older units, in much smaller numbers and most of them were destroyed on the ground, along with bases that were close to Russia. In turn the VKS doesn't push deep into Ukrainian territory because there is no need for long range aerial operations against a nearly non existent air-force and the primary target are ground-based, not aerial.
>the F-22 and F-35 regularly lose mock gun fights against F-16 because it is not the role they were designed for.
Excuses. The F-22 is extremely maneuverable as a design and has thrust-vectoring. Both it and the F-35 are supposed to outperform the F-16 and F-15 in aerodynamic capabilities as well as BVR and stealth. The F-22 achieved this, being more maneuverable than any of its 4th Generation predecessors, the F-35 failed and this is part of the reason the F-35 is criticized as a replacement to the F-16 and F-18. The F-22's main problem aside from technical issues is the lack of an IR targeting system and its prohibitive expensive and complicated production per unit, which is why the program never reached 200 planes. And just because the F-22 is supermaneuverable, and superior to its predecessors does not mean other air-craft are incapable of shooting it down in WVR and BVR combat.

TL;DR: Any turning aircraft bleeds off energy. Some more than others. The F-16 is one of the best fighters for holding energy through transonic turns, better at that even than an F-15C but not nearly as good as F-22 with its thrust vectoring.
Dog-fighting may be a reduced quality, but it absolutely still exists and the F-22 was absolutely designed with being superior to the F-16's, F-18's and F-15's capabilities in mind.



File: 1710529402498.jpg (79.16 KB, 467x300, mao.jpg)

 No.4603[Reply]

How do you take it from a prepper LARP to a legitimate strategy and contingency plan? From what I understand, plenty of revolutionaries have had to do this through history to survive. It seems like a very important skill to have in the event that you need to evade fash or rapidly declining material conditions during the fall of capitalism.

Realistically, how do you accomplish this? Even in an extremely generous situation where you have your own land in the middle of nowhere, and have the money to buy supplies (clothing, repair equipment, tools) once in a while, it seems nigh-impossible in the modern era. Not only do you have to survive mother nature and construct and maintain reliable shetler and storage, you also have to somehow secure methods of maintaining gun supplies, food, clothing, information, etc. Most of this seems to demand either a lot of money or a lot of crime (which has its own issues with making the local proles hostile to you)

I'm interested in resources and methods of training survival skills (without getting myself killed like a retard).

 No.4604

Dont eat strange mushroms

 No.4605

>>4603
>plenty of revolutionaries have had to do this through history to survive
they always had support from local communities. You most importantly need a support system

 No.4611

See https://100r.co/site/off_the_grid.html
It's the comprehensive guide that everyone seems to forget.

 No.4612

Build a bunker to survive WW3 nuclear shit. It can't be that hard

 No.4613

LARP preppers, which dominate SEO on the subject because their conception of prepping is largely based in consumption rather than sustainability, have main character syndrome and want to Minecraft Steve their way to survival while mowing down all the poors for any excuse they can get.

Real prepping would require a cooperative of some sort, and involve permaculture farming.



 No.1076[Reply]

Today, the United States is among a number of nations working to develop and field advanced directed energy weapons, or lasers, for a number of military applications.

Near the end of the Cold War, the Soviet Union began experimenting with the idea of fielding a laser-equipped tank that could blind the targeting systems of inbound ballistic missiles or vehicles. Ultimately, two prototypes of the laser-armed 1К17 Сжатие, translated to “Compression,” were built, though they weren’t complete until the Soviet Union fell and was replaced by the new government of the Russian Federation.

Today, the United States is among a number of nations working to develop and field advanced directed energy weapons, or lasers, for a number of military applications. The U.S. Air Force recently announced its intentions to begin fielding lasers on their fighter platforms as soon as 2025, and the U.S. Navy began testing its latest laser, the MK 2 MOD 0, aboard the USS Portland in May of this year. But decades before these programs came to light, the Soviet Union was already exploring the idea of using lasers as a means of missile defense.

The Soviet strategy wasn’t to use these lasers to destroy incoming missiles like the applications in development today intend to. Instead, the Soviet laser tank aimed to blind or burn out the electro-optical sensors missiles used to find their targets. Once blinded or damaged, a missile would miss its intended target, whether that was the 1K17 or other nearby assets. Other planned applications included using the laser apparatus to blind heavy vehicles like tanks, making it impossible for them to aim and fire accurately.
29 posts and 19 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.4594

File: 1710182288834.png (1.36 MB, 1500x1000, ClipboardImage.png)

Laser weapon news; successful tests of the British Dragon Fire system and a similar US system for anti-air/anti-personnel capability is being tested in the Middle East. The systems resembles the Soviet/Russian Пересвет (Peresvet) laser system which was revealed only in 2018.

https://topwar.ru/237416-britanija-uspeshno-ispytala-lazernoe-oruzhie-dragon-fire-s-shassi-bronemashiny-wolfhound.html

https://topwar.ru/237543-armija-ssha-provodit-ispytanija-zenitnyh-lazernyh-ustanovok-na-blizhnem-vostoke.html

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Категория:Лазерное_оружие_СССР?useskin=vector

 No.4595

File: 1710182371440.png (178.97 KB, 232x300, ClipboardImage.png)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZM-87?useskin=vector

Also this thread is sleeping on the ZM-87, we need more information on this system

 No.4596

File: 1710182542231-0.png (400.48 KB, 381x602, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1710182542231-1.png (684.86 KB, 800x600, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1710182542231-2.png (375.25 KB, 590x403, ClipboardImage.png)

Soviet LASER pistol for astronauts. It's only powerful enough to overload cameras but it looks cool. It actually has single use battery cartridges like bullets in the magazine. The idea was for the astronauts on space stations to shoot this out the window at approaching ships.

 No.4597

File: 1710182867702.png (79.91 KB, 364x282, ClipboardImage.png)

>>4596
There was a laser revolver version of this too. It reminds me of the laser pistol from the original Alien (1979) film.

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Лазерный_пистолет?useskin=vector

https://en.topwar.ru/38339-sdelano-v-sssr-lazernyy-pistolet-kosmonavta.html

 No.4602

>>4597
The laser pistol actually looks cool. The revolver has to be the ugliest looking firearm I've ever seen.



 No.3080[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

Navy thread
Thread for all naval, maritime, ship, submarine & water craft discussion, seas, oceans, lakes, rivers & other bodies of water. Soviet & American shipping alike is welcome, as are civilian vessels. Video & images encouraged. Ekranoplanes & other marine aircraft also count.

Russian / USSR Naval sites: https://flot.com/
https://war-book.ru/nashe-vremya/flot-ww3/
https://вооружение.рф/armaments/sredstva-voenno-morskogo-flota/

US / Western Navy sites (consume with copious amounts of table salt): https://www.naval-technology.com/
https://www.navysite.de/index.htm
https://www.navyrecognition.com/

P.S. Be civil on this Polynesian raft-roping forum.
119 posts and 48 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.4501

>No results found for "Novocherkassk maxar"
What the actual fucking niguyghur

 No.4592

File: 1710172375778.png (529.17 KB, 587x400, ClipboardImage.png)

With the extension of the Lancet's Range and Accuracy recently, the Russians are striking the few small ships the Ukrainians still have, right in port.
https://topwar.ru/238044-kadry-porazhenija-dvuh-ukrainskih-katerov-rossijskimi-dronami-kamikadze-lancet-pojavilis-v-seti.html

They looked to be Project 1176 Akula-class landing ship https://roe.ru/esp/catalog/marina-de-guerra/buques-de-superficie-buques-y-barcos/akula/

 No.4599

File: 1710186667367.png (1.09 MB, 1278x720, ClipboardImage.png)

>>4501
LOL I meant to greentext something else in >>4498 but accidentally copied my initial search result. I found photos after opening Google Images.
https://archive.is/oZAtS

 No.4600

File: 1710187129379.mp4 (31.55 MB, 848x464, Kunikov fight.mp4)

The Kunikov's sinking is confirmed, and I was correct that no "ammo cook-off" occurred. The Kunikov is one of the older modifications of its class, lacking CIWS or machine-gun mounts, so the crew fought back with personal firearms as seen in the video recently released. The Kunikov was hit during night-time hours and was sank as it attempted to limp its way to port. The entire Crew compliment was evacuated by helicopter with no KIA casualties and only a few injuries.

 No.4601

File: 1710187729274.png (1.29 MB, 1600x860, ClipboardImage.png)

>>4600
Another ship was sank last week, Sergei Kotov a Project 22160 patrol ship named after a Soviet Admiral and war veteran. It sank trying to limp to port after being hit by multiple drones in a large drone swarm, many of which it destroyed. It's close position the Kerch strait and bridge has led some to theorize it was hit while defending the bridge, which is a credible reason*. The ship previously defeated 3 drone attacks prior to this.

*Reasons for credence
1) Ukraine has attacked the bridge and damaged it before, with the Truck Bomb
2) Russia has used marine drones to blow up Ukrainian bridges early on in the conflict
3) The recent leaked talks of the Bundeswehr using Taurus missiles to hit the bridge not long after this sinking, and the repeated attempts with Storm Shadow cruise missiles in recent times

https://southfront.press/patrol-ship-sergey-kotov-of-russian-black-sea-fleet-lost-last-battle-against-ukrainian-unmanned-boats/



 No.1376[Reply]

Since tank warfare is a hot topic right now I'll drop some good tank vids.

First vid is a long one covering American tanker school.
61 posts and 38 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.4556

>>4554
Head of Rostech, Sergei Chemezov.
They say it's better than any other tank, but the cost doesn't justify it over buying more T-90 instead.

I think another huge factor is that this tank, and western MBTs, were designed to fight each other head on, which is an absolute unicorn event in wars like this and doesn't justify basing the whole design around it. The majority of tank losses goes around driving on a mine, suicide drone into the engine, ATGM to the side. Thick line of sight frontal armor is just not doing much against threats from all sides.

 No.4557

>>4556
That's not what Rostech stated
>"Армата", она, в общем-то, дороговата. По своему функционалу, она, конечно, намного превосходит существующие танки, но слишком дорогая, поэтому ее сейчас армия вряд ли будет использовать. Проще им купить те же Т-90-е
The Armata is accepted into service but it isn't being used because they're prioritizing the T-90. The T-14 actually has good protection against the threats you're talking about. The Crew Capsule is very well protected. However, as stated its far too costly an investment for a tank that will still be damaged or disabled in combat inevitably, as any AFV does, meaning that its not cost effective. The earlier T-95 and other Future MBT projects of the USSR were more balanced in that regard compared to the T14.

 No.4558

I refuse to believe they don't field existing modern tanks for such idiotic reasons. The 70th brigade used fucking T-55 and T-62 base models at Robotyne.

 No.4564

>>4556
>>4557
Existing Armatas go into service, there won't be any orders for new ones in the near future, but for the T-90 instead.
This doesn't end the Armata, but extends on the many delays it suffers since 2016.
Given that modernized older models are going to refill the losses during the war, it's now even more unlikely that the Armata will ever be used in significant numbers.

 No.4591

File: 1710172121480.png (833.3 KB, 807x400, ClipboardImage.png)

Video of yet another Marder-1 destroyed by a Lancet drone - https://topwar.ru/236826-opublikovany-kadry-unichtozhenija-lancetom-ocherednoj-nemeckoj-bmp-marder-vsu.html

It's notable because the Marder-1 is over double the weight of a BMP 1 or 2 (14-15 tons), especially the up-armored variants which are around 32 tons, yet are taken down by drones just as easily, if not more so, yet Westerners love to talk shit about Soviet tech. I doubt the Puma will do better.



File: 1655978812413.png (70.83 KB, 474x182, ClipboardImage.png)

 No.2188[Reply]

Weapons are often the subject of criminal law and of surveillance. There are many people in situations where it is within their, or our, interest to be armed, but being caught with a weapon would be incriminating.

Three of the solutions of this are:
>hiding the existence of the weapon (generally ineffective if they are aware you may possess weapons, could be effective if no-one is doing a thorough search)
>hiding the purpose of weapon (obfuscation: think of a walking cane with a weapon concealed within. Probably ineffective if they know what they are looking for or are doing a thorough search)
>plausible deniability: having a believable excuse for possessing the weapon, or its components, at least if not in extreme amounts ("I have ammonium nitrate to fertilize my plants", "I have potassium nitrate as stump remover and sugar as a cooking ingredient", "I have petroleum in plastic cans from when fuel prices skyrocketed", "I am legally allowed to own airsoft rifles for recreational purposes", "Vodka isn't illegal and nor are old rags I need when painting.")

What are some plausibly deniable weapons? For the sake of slow board, it's fine to list highly-available typical protest weapons like Molotov cocktails (alcohol/petroleum are usually legal and unsuspicious when disassembled), laser beams and power-tools like nail guns, but I'm curious to see what the most useful weapons are that are completely unsuspicious when disassembled.

Example scenario: pigs know you are an organized radical anti-capitalist and find an excuse to do a general search, hoping to find drugs or unregistered guns or something. What, in it's disassembled form if necessary, could evade their suspicion?
13 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.2440

>>2428
These are literally my costudents

t. I was there too a few times. years ago.

 No.2449

>>2437
very interesting idea
>>2392
it's extremely easy to make a good suppressor by cnc milling a cylinder of aluminum and stuffing the holes with steel wool for baffles. There is also 3d printed suppressors now but I still need to research them before I can comment. They are probably the best option today, in fact the new line of rifles the American military is rolling out right now all come equipped with a 3d printed suppressor.

For an extemely low tech solution you can simply use a plastic (PET) water bottle from the recycling as a suppressor. In fact that is what the chechen seperatists used to great effect during the first battle of Grozyny. A plastic PET bottle taped to the barrel of a bolt action .22 rifle firing subsonic ammunition will be completely silent aside from noise made from crunching the bottle etc. You could even stick one to the end of a .22 pistol and if it doesn't cycle the action then no one in the room with you will hear it fire. Just the sound of a body hitting the floor if you don't catch it.

 No.2599


 No.2609

Dump massive buckets of HRT into the water supply of the Pentagon covertly.

 No.4590

File: 1710171602327.png (16.06 MB, 4096x2730, ClipboardImage.png)

https://topwar.ru/236854-tureckaja-kompanija-razrabotala-nazemnyj-bespilotnik-so-zvukovoj-pushkoj.html
Turkey has developed the AVAZ, a drone-mounted sound-cannon which can at minimum burst ear-drums and cause Nausea, and its dB can hit 184, rupturing the liver and other organs.

On the topic of Sound Guns - https://armystandard.ru/news/20216151111-7AjCF.html



File: 1709430218447.jpg (1.28 MB, 1500x1051, womp.jpg)

 No.4531[Reply]

What it says on the tin - I've seen a couple threads about preparing for a Guerrilla war or whatever, but not much about defending yourself and others at a demonstration or during a riot, which is obviously a much more common situation to find yourself in. I specifically had defending from riot police in mind, but anything would be interesting/useful.
13 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.4582

>>4578
What the fuck do you think being posted, I'm talking about being realistic and not living in childish LARPism that at best is a waste of time and worst will get young niave Idiots arrested.

 No.4583

>>4582
>not living in childish LARPism
its all a larp until it isnt, fed

 No.4584

>>4583
you won't be like Moa, you will end up like the weather underground, a joke that even the police didn't take seriously.

 No.4585

File: 1709905239663.png (603.75 KB, 454x633, 0.png)

>>4584
>you won't be like Moa
your probably right we'll be better

 No.4589

Related to this, around the time of 9/11 and the Iraq and Afghan war the US Army were taking anyone and everyone. It actually became a problem because it’s believed they let in a lot of white nationalist gang associated or perspective members and norteno gang members from California. They came back trained better the cops. There is video of it. I think the guy had an AK



File: 1637919879845.jpg (92.02 KB, 740x1110, 740full-glowie.jpg)

 No.132[Reply]

Please dump all your guerilla warfare/ resistance/weapon manuals/psyop tactics PDFs you have. Im finally making a collection. If therers already a collection somewhere on the site point me to it. It can be CIA stay behind shit, homemade weapons shiut, vietnam shit,guerilla warfare from brazil whatever is practically useful and can be printed and disseminated among people in a revolutionary situation. things that give you some rudimentary education
79 posts and 50 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.4509

>>1146
its not about knowledge its about intent. anyone who is into this shit is assumed to be a danger to current order.

 No.4511

does anyone have the 09A pdfs?

 No.4572

>>4511
Seconding

 No.4574

>>4572
>>4511
Here's the last thread about them, if anyone wants to shift through it to find any guides and pdfs
https://leftypol.org/leftypol/res/645630.html#750333

 No.4588

File: 1709954748702.jpeg (136.32 KB, 1200x801, IMG_9846.jpeg)




File: 1709854930999.jpeg (86.13 KB, 1194x833, IMG_9828.jpeg)

 No.4579[Reply]

So thoughtful

 No.4580

>>4579
Probably either a false flag operation to sow fear in the country or it's genuinely some rogue Ukrainian terror cell

 No.4581

>>4580

time for american terror



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / wiki / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru / zine ]
Previous [ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 ]
| Catalog | Home