[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / edu / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / wiki / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru / zine ]

/tech/ - Technology

"Technology reveals the active relation of man to nature" - Karl Marx
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Join our Matrix Chat <=> IRC: #leftypol on Rizon


File: 1649872407646.png (2.33 MB, 1777x1000, proletariat-lisp.png)

 No.14416[View All]

Last one got full
51 posts and 20 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.16654

Has Stallman ever written about Project Cybersyn or cybernetics?

 No.16660

>>16654
https://www.stallman.org/articles/made-for-you.html
> Made for You
> Richard Stallman
> Ethical Technology
> Posted: Dec 28, 2012
> Esperanto translation https://www.stallman.org/articles/made-for-you.eo.html

""" Growing old, and having lost hope of finding love again, I read about the Lifemates Co-op and was intrigued. “Mr or Ms Right doesn’t exist in nature. If you want someone that was made for you, come to us.” I made an appointment to visit their office and talk with a salesperson…

"Good afternoon, Dr. Stallman," she welcomed me. "Are you looking for a mate?"

"I am, and your service sounds very promising. But I'm concerned about a few things." """

 No.16662

>>16650
>I think that was the first inkling I had of the forces that quietly control our lives."
the Archons use the fascist nuclear family to divide workers, divorce from abusive men is revolutionary action

 No.16668

>>16660
Can someone explain the appeal of having a romantic partner?
I know I sound like I come from Mars, but I'm completely serious.
What drives people to bend over backwards just to get someone to be with?
Stallman is an interesting case for me since I thought he was above this shit and would just remain the lonely computer wizard for the rest of his life.

 No.16671

>>16668
It's called a romantic partner and not a rational partner for a reason

 No.16674

>>16668
romance is what u make it

 No.16677

File: 1662926003232.png (14.05 KB, 480x480, 480px-Hurd-logo.svg.png)

>>16668
>Stallman is an interesting case for me since I thought he was above this shit and would just remain the lonely computer wizard for the rest of his life.
Stallman rarely had girlfriends but he did have them. He was never "the lonely computer wizard" to begin with in the sense of celibacy. For example:

https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/5768
""" Stallman lets his menu drop a little when I bring this up. "Well, most men seem to want sex and seem to have a rather contemptuous attitude towards women," he says. "Even women they're involved with. I can't understand it at all."

I mention a passage from the 1999 book Open Sources in which Stallman confesses to wanting to name the ill-fated GNU kernel after a girlfriend at the time. The girlfriend's name was Alix, a name that fit perfectly with the Unix developer convention of putting an "x" at the end of any new kernel name-e.g., "Linux." Because the woman was a Unix system administrator, Stallman says it would have been an even more touching tribute. Unfortunately, Stallman notes, the kernel project's eventual main developer renamed the kernel HURD.See Richard Stallman, "The GNU Operating System and the Free Software Movement," Open Sources (O'Reilly & Associates, Inc., 1999): 65. Although Stallman and the girlfriend later broke up, the story triggers an automatic question: for all the media imagery depicting him as a wild-eyed fanatic, is Richard Stallman really just a hopeless romantic, a wandering Quixote tilting at corporate windmills in an effort to impress some as-yet-unidentified Dulcinea?

"I wasn't really trying to be romantic," Stallman says, recalling the Alix story. "It was more of a teasing thing. I mean, it was romantic, but it was also teasing, you know? It would have been a delightful surprise."

[…]

When we got to Tech Square, I found Stallman in the middle of a conversation just as we knocked on the door.

"I hope you don't mind," he said, pulling the door open far enough so that Tracy and I could just barely hear Stallman's conversational counterpart. It was a youngish woman, mid-20s I'd say, named Sarah.

"I took the liberty of inviting somebody else to have dinner with us," Stallman said, matter-of-factly, giving me the same cat-like smile he gave me back in that Palo Alto restaurant.

[…]

On the way over to the restaurant, I learned the circumstances of Sarah and Richard's first meeting. Interestingly, the circumstances were very familiar. Working on her own fictional book, Sarah said she heard about Stallman and what an interesting character he was. She promptly decided to create a character in her book on Stallman and, in the interests of researching the character, set up an interview with Stallman. Things quickly went from there. The two had been dating since the beginning of 2001, she said.

"I really admired the way Richard built up an entire political movement to address an issue of profound personal concern," Sarah said, explaining her attraction to Stallman.

My wife immediately threw back the question: "What was the issue?"

"Crushing loneliness."

During dinner, I let the women do the talking and spent most of the time trying to detect clues as to whether the last 12 months had softened Stallman in any significant way. I didn't see anything to suggest they had. Although more flirtatious than I remembered-a flirtatiousness spoiled somewhat by the number of times Stallman's eyes seemed to fixate on my wife's chest-Stallman retained the same general level of prickliness. At one point, my wife uttered an emphatic "God forbid" only to receive a typical Stallman rebuke.

"I hate to break it to you, but there is no God," Stallman said.

Afterwards, when the dinner was complete and Sarah had departed, Stallman seemed to let his guard down a little. As we walked to a nearby bookstore, he admitted that the last 12 months had dramatically changed his outlook on life. "I thought I was going to be alone forever," he said. "I'm glad I was wrong." """

 No.16680

you mean he endlessly pestered women, fucked a few of his impressionable teenage groupies, and exaggerated his exploits to look like a cool bohemian instead of a gross creep?
wow such a chad

 No.16682

>>16680
what is this weirdly misogynistic cope

 No.16684

>>16682
It's not misogynistic, neither is it a cope. But you're a linux user, so I can't expect you to parse ordinary language correctly.

 No.16685

>>16684
It's GNU+Linux.

 No.16686

File: 1662975316916.png (1.11 MB, 1200x800, ClipboardImage.png)

>It's not misogynistic, neither is it a cope. But you're a linux user, so I can't expect you to parse ordinary language correctly.

 No.16687

>>16684
>linux
you mean GNU+linux

 No.16691

>>16677
>Stallman, the ToeJam™ connoisseur, actually managed to get laid

 No.16692

>>16685
>>16687
I call that POS OS whatever I want to. And I call you a drooling autist.

>>16686
How is the desktop market share going? Year of Lunix yet? And while we are at it, let's hear what Richard's female students and colleagues have to say about him.

 No.16693

File: 1662980283208.jpg (25.38 KB, 567x318, software-racism.jpg)

>>16684
can you translate this into bash-cript please
it sounded really horrible in ordinary-script

 No.16694

>>16693
stop dicking around with your toy software and tell me how it's either misogynistic or a cope

 No.16695

>>16692
>Year of Lunix
Looks like you're talking about GNU+Linux.

 No.16696

>>16695
looks like you're being a redditor

 No.16697

File: 1662982156319.png (22.2 KB, 92x108, BSD.png)

>>16684
>you're a linux user
are you referring to the gnu+linux operating system?

 No.16698

>>16695
>>16697
Good question, I personally enjoy a bit of void and I enjoy a bit of suse.

 No.16699

>>16697
I'm referring to a shit OS. BTW, BSD sucks too.

 No.16700

>>16684
>>16692
>Lunix
That's ambiguous, do you mean GNU+Linux?

 No.16701

>>16698
Your life is a void, and your masculinity is a bit sus. Why don't you enjoy some some bitches lmao.

 No.16702

>>16701
>bitches
Don't be a misogynist.

 No.16703

>>16702
that's just AAVE. Don't be a racist

 No.16704

>>16692
>Lunix
are you thinking of the linux kernel component of GNU+Linux?

 No.16705

>>16684
>a linux user
*a GNU+linux user

 No.16706

>>16704
they say things like kernel and korn shell because it's all just undigested shit from the 70s that has been constantly recycled.

 No.16708

>>16684
they're more likely a GNU+linux user

 No.16709

>>16708
Oh? So the extra branding means extra difficulty when understanding simple things. Gotcha.

 No.16710

>>16708
this

>>16684
>linux
it's GNU+Linux

 No.16711

File: 1662983605912.jpg (144.99 KB, 962x612, xixixixix.jpg)

>>16684
>>16692
>linux
it;s GNU+Linux

 No.16713

>>16710
>>16711
your posts aren't reddit. They are CRINGE+reddit

 No.16715

>>16694
I'm the anon that's "dicking around with my toy software" but i'm not the anon you were originally insulting.
I think that you are being labeled misogynistic because you were implying women can't be attracted to Stallman, because women are unable to appreciate his towering intellect.
You basically said women were to dumb to date a smart guy.

 No.16716

>>16715
i called that anon a weird misogynist because of the random mentions of "teenage groupies" and bohemianism mostly plucked out of their fantasy conservative mind palace as a passive aggressive response to the post before which they didn't bother directly replying to

 No.16717

>>16715
I think you are being the misogynist here by implying that "towering intellect" ought to count for more than basic decency or respect towards women- things RMS is lacking in.
>You basically said women were to dumb to date a smart guy.
lol, lmao even. Interpreting my post that way reveals more about you than it does about me.

>>16716
I am not a conservative or opposed to bohemian lifestyle choices in any way. If you read the post correctly, I'm saying that he uses it as a cover for creepy behavior and a cope for his social failures. You fanboys just keep reading things that aren't there.
>passive aggressive
No, I am actively aggressive against Stallman cultists.

 No.16718

>>16677
>At one point, my wife uttered an emphatic "God forbid" only to receive a typical Stallman rebuke.
>"I hate to break it to you, but there is no God," Stallman said.
What a chad

 No.16719

File: 1663013264384.jpg (22.41 KB, 346x284, LairdWilcox.jpg)

> And while we are at it, let's hear what Richard's female students and colleagues have to say about him.

https://stallmansupport.org/the-practice-of-ritual-defamation-laird-wilcox.html
The Practice of Ritual Defamation
日本語 https://stallmansupport.org/the-practice-of-ritual-defamation-laird-wilcox.ja.html
русский https://stallmansupport.org/the-practice-of-ritual-defamation-laird-wilcox.ru.html
Published on April 26, 2021. Last updated May 3, 2021.

Written in 1990, this short essay by Laird Wilcox[1] is pertinent today and specially applicable to the defamation of Richard Stallman. The modus operandi described by Wilcox matches seamlessly the procedure adopted by Stallman's attackers. We are reproducing it verbatim from the original[2] with permission from the author. A 5 minutes read worth one or two whole books on the subject.

Note on licensing: This article is an exception to the default CC-BY-SA license of this site. The author did not grant the public copying permission for this article.

The Practice of Ritual Defamation
How values, opinions and beliefs are controlled in democratic societies

by Laird Wilcox - 1990

Defamation is the destruction or attempted destruction of the reputation, status, character or standing in the community of a person or group of persons by unfair, wrongful, or malicious speech or publication. For the purposes of this essay, the central element is defamation in retaliation for the real or imagined attitudes, opinions or beliefs of the victim, with the intention of silencing or neutralizing his or her influence, and/or making an example of them so as to discourage similar independence and “insensitivity” or non-observance of taboos. It is different in nature and degree from simple criticism or disagreement in that it is aggressive, organized and skillfully applied, often by an organization or representative of a special interest group, and in that it consists of several characteristic elements. #aggressive

Ritual Defamation is not ritualistic because it follows any prescribed religious or mystical doctrine, nor is it embraced in any particular document or scripture. Rather, it is ritualistic because it follows a predictable, stereotyped pattern which embraces a number of elements, as in a ritual.

The elements of a Ritual Defamation are these:

① In a ritual defamation the victim must have violated a particular taboo in some way, usually by expressing or identifying with a forbidden attitude, opinion or belief. It is not necessary that he “do” anything about it or undertake any particular course of action, only that he engage in some form of communication or expression. #no-deed
② The method of attack in a ritual defamation is to assail the character of the victim, and never to offer more than a perfunctory challenge to the particular attitudes, opinions or beliefs expressed or implied. Character assassination is its primary tool. #character-assassination
③ An important rule in ritual defamation is to avoid engaging in any kind of debate over the truthfulness or reasonableness of what has been expressed, only condemn it. To debate opens the issue up for examination and discussion of its merits, and to consider the evidence that may support it, which is just what the ritual defamer is trying to avoid. The primary goal of a ritual defamation is censorship and repression. #no-debate
④ The victim is often somebody in the public eye—someone who is vulnerable to public opinion—although perhaps in a very modest way. It could be a schoolteacher, writer, businessman, minor official, or merely an outspoken citizen. Visibility enhances vulnerability to ritual defamation. #vulnerable
⑤ An attempt, often successful, is made to involve others in the defamation. In the case of a public official, other public officials will be urged to denounce the offender. In the case of a student, other students will be called upon, and so on. #mob
⑥ In order for a ritual defamation to be effective, the victim must be dehumanized to the extent that he becomes identical with the offending attitude, opinion or belief, and in a manner which distorts it to the point where it appears at its most extreme. For example, a victim who is defamed as a “subversive” will be identified with the worst images of subversion, such as espionage, terrorism or treason. A victim defamed as a “pervert” will be identified with the worst images of perversion, including child molestation and rape. A victim defamed as a “racist” or “anti-Semitic” will be identified with the worst images of racism or anti-Semitism, such as lynchings or gas chambers. #exaggeration
⑦ Also to be successful, a ritual defamation must bring pressure and humiliation on the victim from every quarter, including family and friends. If the victim has school children, they may be taunted and ridiculed as a consequence of adverse publicity. If they are employed, they may be fired from their job. If the victim belongs to clubs or associations, other members may be urged to expel them. #humiliation
Any explanation the victim may offer, including the claim of being misunderstood, is considered irrelevant. To claim truth as a defense for a politically incorrect value, opinion or belief is interpreted as defiance and only compounds the problem. Ritual defamation is often not necessarily an issue of being wrong or incorrect but rather of “insensitivity” and failing to observe social taboos. #insensitivity

An interesting aspect of ritual defamation as a practice is its universality. It is not specific to any value, opinion or belief or to any group or subculture. It may be used for or against any political, ethnic, national or religious group. It may, for example, by anti-Semites against Jews, or by Jews against anti-Semites; by rightists against leftists or by leftists against rightists, and so on.

The power of ritual defamation lies entirely in its capacity to intimidate and terrorize. It embraces some elements of primitive superstitious belief, as in a “curse” or “hex.” It plays into the subconscious fear most people have of being abandoned or rejected by the tribe or by society and being cut off from social and psychological support systems. #peer-pressure

The weakness of ritual defamation lies in its tendency toward overkill and in its obvious maliciousness. Occasionally a ritual defamation will fail because of poor planning and failure to correctly judge the vulnerability of the victim or because its viciousness inadvertently generates sympathy.

It’s important to recognize and identify the patterns of a ritual defamation. Like all propaganda and disinformation campaigns it is accomplished primarily through the manipulation of words and symbols. It is not used to persuade, but to punish. Although it may have cognitive elements, its thrust is primarily emotional. Ritual Defamation is used to hurt, to intimidate, to destroy, and to persecute, and to avoid the dialogue, debate and discussion upon which a free society depends. On those grounds it must be opposed no matter who tries to justify its use. #emotional

 No.16720

File: 1663015227840.jpg (11.49 KB, 640x334, tldr.jpg)


 No.16722

File: 1663065152212.jpg (1.17 MB, 2560x1920, p1000542.jpg)

https://www.stallman.org/archives/2022-jul-oct.html#12_September_2022_(Sewer_system_privatization_rejected)
> Private ownership of water and sewer systems should be illegal. No matter how much money the city or county gets for selling one, it will always lose in the long term.

https://www.stallman.org/archives/2022-jul-oct.html#12_September_2022_(Monitoring_employees_minute_by_minute)
> To prevent competitive advantage (or the belief that there is competitive advantage) from stampeding all businesses into intrusive monitoring of workers as if they were machines, we should legislate rules that limit monitoring. When a business argues that "We will be at a disadvantage if we don't do this to our workers, we will have two responses: (1) your competitors can't do this either, and (2) respect for human beings is more important than how much profit you make".

 No.16726

File: 1663078564064.png (30.99 KB, 300x168, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16677
>a flirtatiousness spoiled somewhat by the number of times Stallman's eyes seemed to fixate on my wife's chest
gigachad moment

 No.16817

File: 1663324118435.jpg (4.15 MB, 3648x2736, p1000278.jpg)

https://www.stallman.org/archives/2022-jul-oct.html#15_September_2022_(Military-industrial_complex_captured_US_Congress)
> Congress resists spending money on cancel all student debts, but it has poured the same amount of money into the failing F-35 without hesitating. Why the difference? One can guess that Congress values the military-industrial complex more than mere people.

https://www.stallman.org/archives/2022-jul-oct.html#15_September_2022_(Battle_between_humans_and_sulphur-crested_cockatoos)
> Could some hacker design a device that offers a button for cockatoos to open the bin door so they can eat, but closes the door slowly if it hears a nearby screech? After closing, it could keep the door closed for 30 seconds, responding to the button during that time with "No, no, no." They might learn to stop screeching in order to get at the food. When the 30-second closure period ends, the device could speak, "Hello, Cockie!"

 No.16898

https://www.stallman.org/archives/2022-jul-oct.html#19_September_2022_(New_Pun)
> John Deere puts locked-down nonfree software in its farm machines, arousing the right-to-repair movement among farmers. Nowadays it seems to be producing more de-tractors than tractors.

https://www.stallman.org/archives/2022-jul-oct.html#19_September_2022_(Whether_to_spend_federal_funds_on_ShotSpotter_microphone_system)
> In addition, ShotSpotter microphones listen to the conversation of people talking on the street. That is tyranny, and ought to be forbidden.

https://www.stallman.org/archives/2022-jul-oct.html#19_September_2022_(US_ranked_41_at_meeting_people's_basic_needs)
> I suppose the reasons for specific faults are complex, but it is clear that plutocracy is the fundamental reason the US does so badly with so much money.

 No.16900

File: 1663672005375.png (405.88 KB, 840x859, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16898
>Nowadays it seems to be producing more de-tractors than tractors.

 No.17422

Stallman is an anomaly
He’s heavily involved in STEM stuff, but he doesn’t seem to hold any Hitler Particles as far as current studies have explored

 No.17423

>>17422
why? all the STEM loads I come across are autistic libertarians who seem to get boners if people die from COVID as long as it doesnt touch their sacrosanct liberty.

 No.17424

>>17423
Yeah that’s what I’m saying

 No.17425

>>17422
The Soviets were also heavily involved in "STEM stuff", and they too didn't hold any "Hitler Particles" aside from POWs
>>17423
So you are saying the left needs to attract more "STEM loads" lords? to pull them away from the right ?

 No.21132

>>17422
it's because he hates suffering and has no tolerance for it.
STEM fags, the ones you talk about, are usually blind to suffering.


Unique IPs: 17

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / edu / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / wiki / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru / zine ]