< 2011: DARPA announced that the team "All Your Shreds Are Belong to U.S." won DARPA's Shredder Challenge and $50k. The team used computer-vision algorithms to suggest fragment pairings to human assemblers for verification, piecing togeth

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Options
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Verification
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1701583043764.jpg (124.09 KB, 660x1083, shred.jpg)

Anonymous 03-12-23 05:57:24 No.22681

< 2011: DARPA announced that the team "All Your Shreds Are Belong to U.S." won DARPA's Shredder Challenge and $50k. The team used computer-vision algorithms to suggest fragment pairings to human assemblers for verification, piecing together documents shredded into over 10k pieces.

Anonymous 03-12-23 12:19:03 No.22683

don't shred, burn

Anonymous 03-12-23 12:23:48 No.22684

>>22683
this, how are people so stupid?
>hurr im gonna rip the paper into 34563 recoverable puzzle pieces instead of turning it into dust

Anonymous 03-12-23 12:26:39 No.22685

File: 1701606398479.jpg (457.75 KB, 2000x3000, rVevFipuesBNcgRO2Yf1I8qg6B….jpg)

>>22683
>>22684
Well businesses tend to shred. I doubt spy shit isn't burnt. Remember that Russian consulate burning stuff?

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/black-smoke-chimney-russian-consulate-san-francisco/

Anonymous 03-12-23 12:30:51 No.22686

>>22685
>Well businesses tend to shred
why though? is this some glowie shit where intelligence agencies tricked people into believing shredding works so they can recover information? why would you ever shred instead of burn

Anonymous 03-12-23 13:06:00 No.22687

>>22686
Shredding is done on-site where fires are often impractical. Wikipedia suggests US intelligence among other methods dissolved shredded documents into pulp, which seems reasonable.

Anonymous 03-12-23 13:25:04 No.22688

>>22686
They don't usually have adversaries that are desperate enough to put them together. You always have to consider the threat model they are working with.

Anonymous 03-12-23 19:58:59 No.22692

>>22681
ok but this doesn't eliminate the problem of having to exhume a bunch of wet shit-covered shreds from a landfill before reassembling them.

Anonymous 03-12-23 21:26:13 No.22693

>>22683
Shred and then burn.
Or shred and then compost.

The latter is probably the best method, but it requires paper that isn't chemically treated in a way that would prevent it.

Anonymous 03-12-23 21:51:51 No.22694

>>22693
shred, burn and then snort the ashes

Anonymous 07-12-23 06:26:12 No.22744

should be used for archeology. will probably be used for spying on political dissidents

Unique IPs: 6