restrictions for thee but not for me

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Options	⚽R^SL]O/e{Z' jMIND2H0u*q⚫xCp)5♚♼,}\|U%(⚉ATE9ihw[4_.k`!Y37Ft8d<#☖m-a?Gs=☧;\ 6BX⛶70361
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1704800102933.jpg (658.78 KB, 1080x2400, 1704796627439298.jpg)

Anonymous 2024-01-09 (Tue) 11:35:03 No.22972

restrictions for thee but not for me

Anonymous 2024-01-09 (Tue) 13:43:51 No.22973

>>22972
the best solution would be these companies are sued into nonexistence but everyone still gets to use the tools for free

Anonymous 2024-01-09 (Tue) 16:11:05 No.22974

lol get fucked retard

Anonymous 2024-01-09 (Tue) 20:57:07 No.22975

File: 1704833827176.png (44.72 KB, 1097x244, ClipboardImage.png)

Anonymous 2024-01-10 (Wed) 11:39:41 No.22977

>>22972
Why is it leftists seem to be becoming pro-copyright now?

Anonymous 2024-01-10 (Wed) 11:42:51 No.22978

>>22977
true leftists are only in favor of copyleft and public domain

Anonymous 2024-01-10 (Wed) 21:53:20 No.22979

>>22977
class struggle.
copyright for proles/artisans=good
copyright for capitalists=bad
to say otherwise would be like one of those people who says burgling some wageslave's house is leftist praxis because property should be abolished

Anonymous 2024-01-11 (Thu) 07:52:16 No.22980

>>22977
the hbomberguy video probably

Anonymous 2024-01-11 (Thu) 07:55:07 No.22981

>>22977
I'm pro-OpenAI-getting-fucked.

Anonymous 2024-01-11 (Thu) 08:14:54 No.22982

>>22979
>copyright for proles/artisans=good
1. Artisans are capitalists.
2. Proletarians cannot own private intellectual property. If they do, then they become bourgeoisie.
>to say otherwise would be like one of those people who says burgling some wageslave's house is leftist praxis because property should be abolished
The proletariat's ultimate goal is to abolish private property, ie., capital.

Unique IPs: 7