>>29123i lived through the 2000s
software was more shitty due to limitations, but the design philosophy was vastly better.
AIM is a shitty program by today's standards, but for communication it was indeed better. conversations felt more intentional. Connections to friends felt stronger. If you wanted to talk to someone you had to actually talk to them, you couldnt just post in a group chat hoping any old random person replies, you had to actually seek out and do what you want, rather than floundering in a metaphorical town square waiting for someone to notice you
skype was filled with ads and ran like shit, but it forced everyone to talk in the same space, which made conversations and communities feel more connected. groups weren't immediately split into several sub groups due to an abundance of hyper-specific channels, so people shared interests more often and formed closer friendships.
social media often came in the form of much smaller communities that shared more interests with little care for inflating their user counts arbitrarily
so like, no, i dont wanna go back to the shitty tech we had 20 years ago, but I do very strongly thing if we went back to the design philosophies we held 20 years ago then our tech would be vastly better, and i think if we even went back to those old shitty programs then we would be happier, depending on the software. the design philosophy was so much better that i think the use cases trump the archaic tech used to create them