If someone with AI depicted you as a pedophile, murderer, rapist etc.?
Of course, using Deep Fake tech.
Honestly I'm afraid of this kind of future for many people, especially innocent ones.
>>29841This, this is one of my main concerns on top of this being used to gaslight false confessions and create fake evidence for convictions.
LLMs that we all know as generative AI, in spite of all of its ostensible flaws in its current form, are probably some of the most advanced ways that the ruling class have completely blurred the lines between reality and fantasy and completed the usurpation of experience with things artificially representing that experience in its place.
It's a total assault on material reality itself and the human mind's capability to care about it.
>>29841>The bigger issue with this sort of deepfake stuff is that it's eroding people's belief in actual evidence of actual thingsagreed, seen the same trend with some cool art (sculptures especially), where some guys are like "thats AI generated" despite the photos being older than any AI tools
even for cool pictures of improbable things, now its not even "I suspect some photoshopping", because doing good fakes was taking a lot of effort and could almost always be spotted by anyone really bothering to check, so people just assume its AI and dismiss it.
The threat of AI undercapitalism is two-fold:
1. Pareidolia can become so intense it can actually lead to to de-humanization, which affects heavy AI users most readily, and is nearly ubiquitously seen against the technologists in silcon valley. Most of them have already dehumanized themselves, and don't perceive themselves as humans, but as inferior AI. We see patterns and we impose meaning onto them. We see patterns that resemble humans, even in the most superficial and comical way (a smiling faces), and we cannot help but begin to think and feel that what we see is a human. AI, which reflect human intelligence back at humans, trigger this deeply seated tendency to mirror and transfer intention onto something that we can consciously be aware is incapable of possesing such intentionality, but cannot "unsee". This tendency is primordial, and unavoidable. But when decisions about the role of AI in our society is placed into the hands of people utterly deluded by their pareidolia, some to a nearly level of religious zeal, we are in danger.
2. If AI agents can be developed to act as economic units, e.g. a worker, and AI agents can directly compete with humans as economic units (rather than enchaining "productivity" of humans) by being able earn money, save, invest, and spend money autonomously, then they are on the path to outcompeting all human beings on economic efficiency, reducing the value of human beings under captialism to 0.
Refuting both of these requires a politics that is human centric and values human dignity. Unfortunately, many communists these days see this as "humanist" and reject it. So we are all going to be slaughtered. Maybe the Chinese AI will be better utilized.
>>29854> If someone with AI depicted you as a pedophile, murderer, rapist etc.?if you're concerned about someone canceling you, you shouldn't worry since you're not nearly famous enough
if you're concerned about the pigs producing fake evidence of you, you shouldn't worry since the US is undermining due process, "evidence" will be a thing of the past, fake or not
>>29861>calling it reactionary fear (your words)>adamant in denying its just culture war shit>thinks culture war is when queers, and only when queerslol
btw learn to greentext newfag
Unique IPs: 26