No.4697
Uhhh, maybe if you narrowed down what you are looking for…
Obviously you can get most models and brands of pistol for under that price. Rifle a little more challenging.
No.4698
>>4696why do you need guns, anon?
No.4699
>>4698To shoot people and or animals.
No.4700
>>4699>To shoot people just tase them or pepper them
>animalsgrow food and some affection, anon
No.4701
>>4697Yeah $600 is a bit low, how about a rifle for under 1k. Something light, fast and easy to maneuver.
No.4702
What are you looking to hunt?
>birbs in flight, small game
Shotgun
>stationary birds
Low power rifle, either .22 or .222 or both or a combination gun
>big game
.308, 6.5x55 or similar
No.4703
>>4696guns are for pussys
>>4700this, get therapy
No.4704
>>4702to add to this, if you want cheap guns, get a bolt-action rifle and a break action shotgun. this covers a lot and both are cheap. where I live break action shotguns go for $50, bolt-action rifles $150
>>4703there's nothing wrong with killing
No.4705
oh and of course a 10/22 for plinking. they're $500 here used, but that usually gets you a whole bunch of accessories
No.4706
>>4700>>4698>>4700>>4703>anti guns fags are all glowingNo surprise there.
No.4707
>>4706people who need guns are compensating, chins dont need them why do you?
No.4709
>>4701Some kind of AR probably. Good because there are so many options to build your own part by part. Downside is a lot of research to do.
No.4710
>>4707You take it on the chin I give it on the chin. We are not the same.
No.4712
>>4707>chins dont need them why do you?For larping or comiting illegal action
Both reasons are
BASED as fuck
No.4713
>>4712Forgot to turn the flag back on
No.4714
>>4708>>4709>>4710gun chinlets aching as i type this
>>4712the only honest and respectable answer. high honors anon
No.4715
Oy Yea
No.4716
>>4696If it's for legal home defense, which I'm assuming because it's a moss 88, then that shit is usually a larp and will never get used so you might as well just get the cheapest break action shotgun you can find for that 1/1,000,000 scenario in your head. The reason for a shotgun is not because of the "spread" in that short amount of distance, but rather you have more control over the size of the pellets which helps against overpenetration. The median amount of shots used in self-defense scenarios was 2 and that was mostly with handgun shootings, which you'd likely panic dump. The break action is also nice because of the extremely low chance for a malfunction or user error because you definitely can fail to fully rack the slide, easily if you don't have extensive practice with it. It's like how a revolver is more reliable than a regular pistol.
An 88 isn't a bad choice though. It'd get the job done. I'd only recommend going north of the 88 if you're an enthusiast and you just like guns.
No.4718
>>4717How about not be a retard that gets into deathmatches in the first place.
No.4721
>>4709Do you know any good places to start researching?
No.4723
>>4719If you don't act like some thug and/or hang around obviously dangerous people then you're almost certainly never going to need to fight for your life, how many times do you think the average person has to do that?
No.4724
>>4723I absolutely agree that prevention is the best defense. At the same time what does it matter if someone has a gun or not? We all have knives but we don't stab people. Many of us have cars but don't commit vehicular homocide. Antiguns is just liberal hysteria.
No.4725
>>4724Guns make it much easier to kill people though. Obviously it's possible without them but much harder and usually more visceral and brutal. Maybe if society was more healthy it wouldn't be needed to get rid of guns but as things are I think it's crazy to allow people to fuck around with them.
No.4726
>>4725All i want is that the people i dislike (Right winger in general, school shooters, FBI, US soldiers, mentally unhinged people, ultraconservatives neoliberals) don't have guns, while the people i like (Posadistas), have guns. It will make things much easier
No.4730
>>4725exactly
>>4724>>4724>Antiguns is just liberal hysteria.no gun faggots are obnoxious asf just like 420 culture
>>4718this
>>4717this is 90% of gun faggots
No.4731
>>4730counterpoint: the gun is good
No.4732
>>4731guns are for pussys who eventually kill themselves. 80% of suicides use guns. try again
No.4733
>>4732Do antigun fags even hear themselves?
>real men don't use vehicles, not even public transit, they use their legsThat's how stupid you sound
No.4734
>>4733Hmmm… has 5hat parallel ever been drawn? Antigens faggots and luddites? Yes that is exactly what it is.
>Heh you are using an image board? Real men send letters on the pony express! No.4735
>>4734>>4733stop pretending to be 2 different anons
>>4733>Do antigun fags even hear themselves?heavy projection,gun faggots really are homos in their obsession with phallic objects
No.4736
>>4735Lol we're trying to go the full spectrum of liberal pop psychology ITT are we?
>projection>immediately starts talking about penises where it is not relevantKek. The ironing.
No.4738
What about woombic/vaginic(what is the hole equivalent of phallic?) guns?
No.4739
>>4737atleast your honest
>>4736>>4736> liberal pop psychology ITT<denying legit psychological coping mechanismsmarxist and freud would slap and rape the shit out of you. sounds hot
No.4740
>>4739Are you trying to win an award for how much of your personal sexual pathology you can put in every post?
No.4743
>>4740No he is just actually mentally disabled
No.4748
>>4746>99% of spree shooters can shoot easy.spree shooters are true proles
>>4747>we should ban carswe should make forts and castles out old cars and enforce neo-medevalism with socialist characteristics
No.4757
>>4738engulfing/trapping weapons like net throwers and traps
No.4760
Paranoid schizoid thread, meds.
Just tell the guy what fucking spicy metal to buy
No.4761
>>4760The recent generation of Taurus handguns is more reliable than the previous generations that gave them their bad reputation.
No.4762
>>4760>Just tell the guy what fucking spicy metal to buynickel
No.4764
>>4761Their revolvers were always decent. FBI statistics show you don't need a double stack pistol unless it's an occupational risk factor, so capacity isn't really a concern. Also consider the fact that defensive firearms (I assume OP wants it for that reason) will never be used in your life, so the reliability of the revolver is much better since you'll probably get tired of maintaining it after a year or two.
No.4770
>>4767…That's not what this scene was about, at all.
No.4771
https://palmettostatearmory.com/daily-deals-new.htmlJust get some ar 15 on sale. You can even find some well reviewed ones for under your 600 price tag. Be careful with the rules with the "pistol" ones.
No.4772
Why ever suggest a handgun to anyone for any purpose? We have hundreds of years of war data showing handguns cause 0.00001% casualties (except for suicides) because they are hard to shoot accurately.
No.4776
>>4772Handguns look cool, are easy to hide, and are great for 90% of situations you'd find yourself in. I can't imagine why you wouldn't have one?
Unique IPs: 18