No.14821
>>14795Honestly inceldom is a preferable alternative to this sad as shit fucking stuff holy
No.14826
>>14821I don't think they're mutually exclusive.
No.14829
Wow. Eceleb has an OPINION. Tell me why I should value his? What are his qualifications? I bet you quote the old testament out of context too OP. Fucking a
No.14832
Of course the guy who made a fortune on selling pez dispensers and shitty figurines would have no problem with consumerism infiltrating religion.
Also, "rock" legend is too generous
No.14834
>>14829id think gene simmons is a plain old celeb rather than e-celeb
>>14832>consumerism infiltrating religionoh no that sucks for religion
anyway,
No.14838
>>14834If he stays stupid shit on twitter in order to stay relevant enough to be featured in news articles on trashy sites that OP thinks so interested we needed knowing, he's very much the embodiment of an eceleb.
No.14839
>>14838while i dont think this merited a thread he didnt say anything stupid
No.14850
>>14839he said something on twitter, hence an eceleb
>>14848>news article about a stupid has-been's tweets attempting to stay relevantThis is like asking George Takkei what he thinks about abortion. An eceleb.
No.14851
>>14850not what e-celeb means but ok
No.14852
>>14850he's not famous thanks to the internet, fuckwit.
No.14858
>>14851>>14852>an internet celeb that is famous due to things he saying on twitter>not an ecelebThe ONLY reason this eceleb is being talked about on this board is because he said something on twitter and you read a news article on it. Go back to ANN. Talk about anime, not some retards uneducated ramblings just because other news sites do.
No.14860
>>14858if you change the definition of e-celeb accepted by everyone, sure ok
No.14862
idk why you keep bumping a thread that pisses you off so much either
No.14864
>>14860I think neither it important, nor mutually exclusive. That's like claiming an eceleb can't have a real life presence. My point isn't to argue about concrete meaning of words. The meaning of my initial message wasn't muddled by using colorful language. Not everything is literal.
>>14862>eitherWho are you speaking for?
No.16934
>>16929This is who open-source and free software is superior to propeterity products. if only there was a open-source version of that software.
No.17019
>>14858>an internet celeb that is famous due to things he saying on twitterThat's not why he's famous though, young one. That's irrelevant though, I still agree with your first post. Just don't die on this hill before you google who Gene Simmons actually is.
No.17020
>>16934I read about this hologram thing (imagine using this for practicing another language!) and immediately noped out when I saw that it required a network connection. There is also a neat thing out developed as a companion for old people which kinda looks like a lamp, but again it needs a network connection. They are ALL like that.
It's not just that things like these turn into bricks when the company goes under or decides to do something else, but like Alexa it constantly sends information from the sounds inside your house to an outside party. This shit is so common it is infuriating. I wouldn't mind closed source for an assistant/toy if it made a robust impression and worked offline.
No.17023
But what does Ja Rule have to say?
No.17028
>>17022You will be replaced.
Unique IPs: 18