Manga prominently featuring female characters and perspectives. I recently read some Tomoko Yamashitas works, and would appreciate if anyone has recommendations for more. Can also serve as a yuri thread, since old one is full.
>>20323I thought babby's first yuri was
>>20308 This Anime I remember watching Strawberry Panic years ago.
>>20308you're retarded.
>>20322yuri it's not porn.It can't be porn, but not necessarily.
>>21756Seems stale? What did you like about it?
>>22058Much appreciated, thank you.
>>22088 >pics <Weird looks and appearances<smudge texture<Yang's weird-ass small face <that wack-ass penis placementAt least post GOOD RWBY futa FFS
admittedly there's not a lot of good futa on futa RWBY tbhBut yes, correct.
>>21897>>22088>>22091>judging based on participants rather than actual quality of the workcringe af, especially as none of you have posted anything particularly good
In particular, the last picture confuses me… WTF is that huge thing on the red girl's penis? Is that a sounding toy? Is it a huge pimple?
>>22094>judging based on participants rather than actual quality of the workWTF does that mean?
>none of you have posted anything particularly good As compared to yourself… who posted nothing at all.
>WTF is that huge thing on the red girl's penis<this nibba isn't paying attention to the details of the pic<doesn't know Seraziel LMAO
>>22096>WTF does that mean?That saying futa>yuri is stupid because the variation between works/ artists is way greater than the variation between them. It's like saying jazz is better than rock (stupid) instead of saying miles davis is better than the clash.
>As compared to yourself… who posted nothing at all. Why on earth would you assume that I've posted nothing? I posted my manga recs.
>isn't paying attention to the details of the picAre you saying that that's supposed to resemble an animal penis? I do not believe that a single animal in the world has a healthy penis that looks like that.
>expects me to know every reasonably popular futa artistno. In any case, from what I've seen of them, I'm not impressed.
>>22098It's the genre of pornography that's visual enough for men to stomach it, but disproportionately less focused on visceral arousal, and more on companionship, romance, etc. It thus attracts people who tend to be less aggressive, but more pretentious (me). Perfect combo for autist-posting.
Sometimes I think I should just shitpost like I'm supposed to, but usually the idea disgusts me. And then I think of how funny is it to imagine the person recoiling and cringing at my autist-posts and I think "doesn't that make me the true shitposter?" and then I continue.
>>22099I am not trans
>>22097…are you genuinely autistic? Seriously how long have you been off meds to be this invested in a shitpost about a porn genre, I'm both concerned yet amused.
>It's like saying jazz is better than rockLOL not only is that false equivalency but the reasoning of "futa > yuri" went over your head entirely even though it's been a long running joke regarding lesbians in /h/ and /d/.
>Why on earth would you assume that I've posted nothing? 1) It may be a surprise to you but this is an ANONYMOUS short-rib cooking forum, I can't see your IP or know your post history (nor do I want to).
2) I was referring to your post, replying to 3 people having a laugh and posting some relevant pics, complaining about 'quality' of posted pics while posting no image yourself. As you have done again.
As a side note you can read the posts and see they're about futa, if you don't like it as you seem to imply, then why click the spoiler?
>Are you saying that that's supposed to resemble an animal penis If you're trying to bait me into posting zoophilia you'll find me lacking that content on my hard-drive nor would I post it. If you're not baiting then you're either sheltered (weird considering you're posting in a glorified hentai thread) or just stupid. Also as a veterinarian and biology major, most animal penises are tubes of flesh and many look grotesque to us; if you've ever had the displeasure of seeing an unneutered male pig harassing a sow, you'll know what I'm talking about.
TL;DR: It's a canine penis, because of Ruby's wolf theme in the pic, Seraziel is known for them and it's a popular non-human choice in porn today.
>expects me to know every reasonably popular futa artist <proceeds to state they've seen their stuff. <somehow knows they're relatively popularDon't pretend this is a case of deductive reasoning either, I know you will.
>In any case, from what I've seen of them, I'm not impressedAny particular reason? They have good shading, good color gradients, texturing, anatomical proportions are good, characters have personality in his images etc. Hell I'm not actually a fan of most of their content, but I'm not going to be disingenous and call it poor or middling.
>>22108>are you genuinely autisticNo, genuinely lonely af though. I've taken autistic tests and actually score lower than the average non-autistic person.
>even though it's been a long running joke regarding lesbians in /h/ and /d/.Can you generally assume that every person on this board knows references from /h/ and /d/? Genuinely curious. In any case I haven't been on those in years.
>this is an ANONYMOUSHence why I was wondering why you thought I hadn't posted anything. But I'm not really a single-image hentai connoisseur. So my favorite futa artist is Yassy. But idk if they have any really striking single pages. I like pic related more than any of the other posted pics. So if you wanted something to insult my taste with, you have your fuel I guess.
>if you don't like it as you seem to implyI didn't try to. They're fine, I just thought trying to prove that futa>yuri with pics that imo were mid was a problem… But they're still mid. I don't hate mid.
>TL;DR: It's a canine penisI literally looked up what those look like and they don't really look like that, but w/e. It's a bit poorly drawn there I suppose. The artist draws them more accurately in most of their other works so w/e.
>Don't pretend this is a case of deductive reasoning either, I know you will. No, I just looked them up in response to your post lol. How did you not figure that out?
>Any particular reason? Considering that you don't even like most of their stuff I'm not sure I need a particular reason. They seem fine, just struck me as rather generic. I like things more stylistic usually. I'd be impressed if my friend could draw that well, but by the standard of a professional they don't wow me. Maybe mid is too harsh? I feel like they're maybe a bit above average pixiv quality, but nothing special IDK what to call that if not mid.
>>22114>Can you generally assume that every person on this board knows references from /h/ and /d/Used to be that yes, most people posting here got the same jokes since regardless of political stances people here were more or less a product of the overarching imageboard cultures and subcultures. To be fair I haven't been on those boards in years either, I just recall it well enough I suppose.
>if you wanted something to insult my taste withI'm not insulting anyone, I was just taking the piss out of the other anon for laughs
>they don't really look like thatDepends on the canine. For some its a nearly shapeless pinkish-reddish mass, like someone pushed a herniated intestine into a test-tube, others look more like the illustrated versions
>How did you not figure that out Honestly I'm just fooling around, your candidly cool response is honestly a relief
>Considering that you don't even like most of their stuff I dislike it mostly because of personal pet-peeves, where a drawing will be good, but a single detail just bothers me and I can't unsee it… or other reasons.
>by the standard of a professional Professional by what definition? I don't think they went to art school, or something like that, so do you mean in regards to doing it for money?
>>22317I feel like the criticism of the male gaze separating object from subject fundamentally confuses the subject-object dichotomy. Like "seeing a person as a subject" is a type of seeing them as an object, it isn't possible to separate the two (it would only be possible to separate the two if we literally became them). Thus, the difference is lack of subjectification (and tacit involvement of the audience) not objectification per say.
Also if this is meant as a criticism of yuri manga, about 2/3 of yuri manga authors and 1/2 of the yuri audience is female by just about every poll I've seen (including polls on 4chan).
Despite all of that, good vid.
>>22339Nah, stale has a negative connotation (ya know, like stale bread). What I tried to convey was that the manga simply seems typical, but meant no more than that.
Very long way around means of asking OP to expand on their opinion.
>>22794Its supposed to be vague. Basically shoujo/josei, but also, would psychological manga such as
>>22788 count as josei?
>>22789(Spoiler warning for the anons who didn't read)
I've finished it… and it's about newly appearing desires haunting our main character which makes her to 'hire prostitutes'.
Eh, she does not care about anything ,even abstract, magical or special accumulated on the idea of love and she is fine with commodity exchange to buy seggs.
Thank you for the recommendation, it was an interesting at first glance, but somehow it became gloomy- I'd be more pleased if the main character's feelings gets subgujed by a newly realized intense affection-obsession towards the prostitute which she hired and maybe they'd both get in a long journey together more than a mere relation of commodity exchange.
So, this was one of the mangas that made me feel apathetic and consumed. All the things are tiresome and I can't find anything to cling into.. this girl found something in sex… just pathetic, temptating slave-morality stuff, blehh…
>>22796Quite a lot of women make stuff for shounen/seinen mags.
>Its supposed to be vague.So just vibes? Just make a thread about the specific manga you like at this point.
>>22798It's always been a useless descriptor, not unlike "JRPG" and "WRPG" in video games.
>>22803Unlike in the west manga has a lot of women authors so this thread could get anything posted.
Pic related: Bocchi the Rock is made by a girl, has all-girl cast, published in a seinen mag with a lot of other seinen with similar characteristics to it.
>>22802>they'd both get in a long journey together more than a mere relation of commodity exchangeThat would be very silly. She is a prostitute, what "journey together" could she have with her client? And the girl doesnt really desire love, as much as merely her own feeling of self-worth.
>>22803I dont care who its made by, or even for, but as
>>22805 suggested, pretty much just vibes. Deals with female characters in serious-ish manner. Drama, romance, psychological, that kind of stuff. For example watamote is too cartoony, while Bocchi (from little I have seen so I might be completely off the mark) seems like standard moe-blob anime, and Brides Story is historical adventure, neither being really about women. I dont know, they just lack the emotional element.
Oh, is this the shoujo thread (mods might find it productive to change the title or content of thread's O.P. to be something like "Shoujo/josei General Thread"?)?!!
>recommendation(There are already easily found lists of many currently mainstream or currently popular ones so these are more likely to be personal preference biased.)Classic (relatively) works, from Watase Yuu, Ikeda Riyoko, and Ichijo Yukari for instances, are likely to be safe bets‐
And CLAMP's works are also
, although the fujo content sometimes goes…bit far sometimes (LOL), popular ones probably, and several of their portfolio have gotten adapted into anime if that's more preferred!
Morimoto Kozueko is also one who has some fun series, at least that I've enjoyed.
And
Akatsuki no Yona is another one potentially worth your try, which hasn't finished yet and has also had its manga been turned into anime (beware of the spoilers though).
For josei manga recommendations I am not anywhere as versed and acquainted as some others might be, so apologies there…not many suggestions to give there.
>Full Metal Alchemist: BrotherhoodOne very very worthwhile series, that is excellently paced quite consistently, it is to go check out, even though technically the source material was not published in a shoujo magazine originally AFAIK. The author herself additionally was born in an agricultural region, later to go to the city, and has another series, about a youth who moves to the countryside from the city, called
Gin no Saji that looks also like good stuff.
>>22794The audience demographic that the magazine claims to target is certainly, as people say, large part of what determines the categorization of the works published into shounen/shoujo/seinen/josei/and so on and so forth, despite the presence of much crossover actually of the magazines' readerships and authorships, but there is also the element of art-style and there is sort of aesthetic similarity and aesthetic inclinations; plus at least for the classics there are probably more emphasis on certain topics and such, like "ningen kankei" ("peoples' relationships") in classic shoujo and how shounen traditionally often utilized more diverse environments, to not even mix in the question of "adult content", adult themes, and such for seinen and josei. The former 2 additionally compared to the latter 2 could perhaps have more "normative" elements, as society has its expectations that popular media consumed by youth audiences should both not harm the youth or promote criminal behavior. The comics in the American core of the West had content codes back in the day too, and the publishers were bound to them, were they not?
But anyhow… Maybe the original poster or someone could refine the question?
>>20309>bait implying pedoshit>"culture shaming">totally not kink shaming>"pls don't kink shame me owo"gay
>>20308Bait
There's other yuri with adults, it ranges from creator to creator when it comes to pedoshit. It's no different then any other animu genre
>>23613This, although i did drop a few yuri manga for having underage shit
Unique IPs: 28