"Spook," spectre" or "phantasm?" Mine is "spook" because it's pretty specific and unique to dialectical egoism. And you can also play with it by adding prefixes and postfixes (i.e. spooked, despooked, unspooked, spooky, reverse-spooked, anti-spook, spookprejudiced). I also like to say "sacred idea" or "ghost in the mind" sometimes.
>>3402Caring about how naming spooks is a spook.
I like calling people imbeciles.
>>3406Well, I mean, Stirner did use the dialectical method. That's why I said "dialectical." But Stirner used that to pwn Hegel epic style so I don't see why that's a problem. You can also call it Stirnerian egoism, nihilist egoism or whatever the fuck. Rational egoism works too, I think. Though there are other "egoisms" that are called "rational." Like Rand's brand of egoism.
>>3407>I like calling people imbeciles.Based.
my favourite word is dick sauce
phantasmagoric