how do you cope with the fact that the revolution has died long before we came along and that there is utterly no hope for any kind of worker's paradise
[Spoiler]the answer is crime[/Spoiler]
>>3820*thank you my friend*
>>3821communism is acknowledged, yes, but for some reason I can't bring myself to believe that there will ever be enough movement; enough rallying; enough publishing; enough power to ever defeat capital
>>3826>it's not like living in the USSR or maoist China was any less of a nightmare after their respective revolutions.🤡
Is this the power of western education?
>>3830honey the nato hat balistic missiles all over the place so what the fuck is a wall gonna do?
the reality is that before putting up the wall the easts governemnt had a real problem in trained workforce and craftsmen leaving for the west and they put up the wall to mstop that
>>4187Private property is a spook
Abstractions don't hinder me
>>4199>they dont know they are talking to a gigachad aristocrat individualist ayy lmao
No, to be serious for a second, obviously private property and it's implications are a social reality. Even if the terms we use to describe these systems often become spooky abstractions, private property, class hierarchy and nations are without a question part of the concrete experience of existence. This doesn't change no matter wether or not you are a conscious egoist. Obviously I work a shitty wage job and have to pay rent every month, it's a necessity for me to fulfill my other desires (although there are plenty conscious egoists who squad buildings and dont have need a job to realise their desires). But if I was reigned by the spook of property, I would live an even worse existence because I would venerate the same idea that restricted me. Since property would be holy to me, I couldn't just take without payment or permission, I couldn't scrounge stuff off my job, I would be even more poor. I couldnt look to other non-regulated income opportunities if I worshipped the law or proletarian morality. And sure, those are small victories, but I can only reach in this world as far as my arms go, and who sais I would have to grasp more?
Cause that's the spook on the other side, on your side. Because reading this you've probably asked yourself how this is gonna abolish private property or classes. The answer is simple: it's not. The cause of abolishing capitalism is as much my cause as the veneration of capitalism. Yes, class hierarchies and property laws inhibit my intercourse with the world, but basing my affair on the anarchist or marxist struggle would reduce me all the same - aside from the fact that even you social anarchists still have to go to work and pay rent, you just have to do it while seething and grinding your teeth even more. Private property is a spook, but I'm not moved by spooks, neither to their preservation nor their abolition. To Me it's already abolished, and what it means to others isn't My affair.
So what do I tell my landlord and boss? I greet them nicely when we meet and rob them when they are gone.
>>4200>what it means to others isn't My affairOk so you don't give a fuck.
So, how do you "appropriate the world" concretely, besides stealing shit?
>>4201I consume it. Every aspect of it I like, In indulge in as far as my desire goes. I don't stop at the limits imposed by morality, tradition or social norms. I take the world as what it is to me, and unlike the social anarchist, I can take it without having to worry about sanctifying it through anarchism.
Of course if ppl at large got rid of their spooks, capitalist property and the state would be lost, but generating that consciousness within them isn't my cause. I can also take the people of the world as they are to me and don't have to scoff about others not following the true believe, not being the right kind of marxist/anarchist.
>>4202>I consume it. Every aspect of it I like, In indulge in as far as my desire goes.So you're just another Hedonist.
>I don't stop at the limits imposed by morality, tradition or social norms.Maybe but you are still limited by the material conditions of your daily life.
>>4203Nah, a hedonist can only satisfy his bodily desires, he's not satisfying his whole being.
>Maybe but you are still limited by the material conditions of your daily life.Sure, as I admitted earlier. Unless you move to the woods and break with civilisation, that will always be the case. But I can't really say I'd prefer that, I rather like my small life of working 25h a week, living in a small flat and reading theory. It's comfy.
>>4265Wow, crazy insight anon!
What kind of board do you think your on? Post-leftism basically came into existence when Bookchin cried about "lifestylism" in the 90's.
Unique IPs: 28