[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / wiki / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru / zine ]

/draw/ - Original Art

"The strength of art is greater than that of a nuclear bomb" - Kim Jong-Un
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Join our Matrix Chat <=> IRC: #leftypol on Rizon


 No.1216

Edit Thread
Post, request and make image and drawing edits and colorations. Instructions and templates also welcome.

Requestfags:
>Spoiler NSFW content
>Be specific as possible so you get your request right the first time, that means really pour over your pic and think about it
>Don't complain too much about the final product, after all you're getting your request for free whereas most artists not only charge money, but would also be too moralfag to edit another artist's work
>Try and find the highest resolution of the pic as you can, because not only are you getting better quality, you're also helping make more accurate edits
>Post your request with names/authors/copyrights, references and links in one post. Cite the image source
Editfags:
>You should probably use Photoshop, and make special use of the 'spot healing brush' tool when it comes to removal requests.
>ALWAYS save as .png ; everytime you save as .jpg/.jpeg the final product LOSES quality and data. Stop this shit, please. Doesn't matter if the original pic you're editing was in .jpg/.jpeg format, you save as .png because it's lossless
>If you have to make a transparent crop/edit whatever of a specific character/object on a layer, always save the individual layers seperately for upload before saving the whole thing together for the final product to be uploaded. This accomplishes multiple things: 1. it allows different backgrounds and such to be edited in for later and 2. It allows either you, another editfag, or the requester to go back and change something if you didn't quite do the request right the first time. No one wants to layer-via-cut the main character and merge it with the background only for the requester to ask that you go back and do it again because it wasn't the background they wanted, because then you have to cut the lines YET AGAIN and that would be tedious; don't forget to upload the layers as seperate files when you're done
>Upload your delivery/edit onto the booru(s) https://colordump.booru.org https://4edit.booru.org/index.php?page=post&s=list

>How to do a color edit

- Open your preferred image editor.
- Apply "multiply mode" on layer 1 (the original picture).
- Apply colors on layer 2 (below layer 1).
>How to remove colors:
- Open in GIMP, add alpha channel,
- Select by color and delete.
can also use Paint Tool SAI2

https://codegesse.tumblr.com/post/88385184105
Lefty Templates: https://lefty.booru.org/index.php?page=post&s=list&tags=template
Elzi Templates: https://e-hentai.org/g/1503365/43b7716a64/

>*Beginner's guide to color editing with GIMP:

https://desuarchive.org/trash/thread/25775373/#25846796
https://desuarchive.org/trash/thread/25775373/#25846844
https://desuarchive.org/trash/thread/25775373/#25846951

 No.1219


 No.1221

File: 1635383750401.png (1.39 MB, 1280x720, ClipboardImage.png)

Anyone got the original template for this meme?

 No.1223

Another way to remove color:
>open image
>add new layer below for color
>set blend mode for original image layer to multiply
>adjust the shading of the original image using color options
>>brightness/contrast
>>levels
>>curves
You can also just alter colors by adding a new layer for the changes and setting that layer's blend mode to any of the color-altering options like "hue" or "color"

 No.1224

>>1223
Thanks m8, glad to see more advise!

 No.1225

File: 1635613964919.jpg (4.21 MB, 5000x3760, fix faces.jpg)

Can someone fix the mouths and make them lower?

 No.1226

File: 1635626312863.png (761.3 KB, 1280x720, 1635614496551.png)


 No.1227

File: 1635627011469.jpg (6.58 MB, 5000x3760, mouth fix.jpg)


 No.1228

>>1227
thanks anon, the level 8 animu face bothered me too much.

 No.1229

>>1228
Is there a reason all posts are Egoist and Stirner memes are in the bottom right corner? is this a Samhein themed thing?

 No.1230

>>1229
I think they set the default flag to the anarcho-individualism one. Today is Halloween so I guess it's just a theme for today. It's been an imageboard tradition for a long time to do stuff like this. A bit surprised they didn't set the site to play the Ghostbusters theme in the background but that would be really obnoxious.

 No.1231

>>1229
yep
>>1230
>A bit surprised they didn't set the site to play the Ghostbusters theme in the background but that would be really obnoxious.
this kek

 No.1455

File: 1636507068427.png (574.05 KB, 1366x768, ClipboardImage.png)

R/ing a Hammer and Sickle on pic related's flag
>YOU'RE FIGHTING SO YOU CAN WATCH TV AS EVERYONE AROUND YOU REACHES FOR THE STARS!

 No.1458

File: 1636514900898.gif (Spoiler Image, 380.45 KB, 359x450, 95f37a8c696c73cba744d5a81f….gif)


 No.1459

>>1458
Indeed, cat booba kek

 No.1462

File: 1636557924707.png (1.45 MB, 1197x664, ClipboardImage.png)

Sa this on /siberia/ and keked

 No.1589

a template for memes

 No.1590

>>1455
>>1458
>>1459
Anyone drawing large breasts on Nicole Watterson should be shot.

 No.1592

File: 1637193844225.png (79.03 KB, 853x1280, ClipboardImage.png)

>>1590
cope

 No.1598

>>1590
This. People's bodies should be represented more or less accurately within the limits of stylization.

 No.1599

Requesting Red Stars on the side/front of the train and an CCCP on the wings of Astrotrain in pic related. I want it to go with the whole commie theme Astrotrain already has (SVD rifle, ushanka, soviet side-plated train, Buran shuttle etc.)
>CCCP letters: https://ih0.redbubble.net/image.596876974.4097/stf,small,600x600.jpg
>Buran: https://airandspace.si.edu/exhibitions/space-race/online/sec500img/547l3p3.jpg
>Locomotive: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/b1/1f/01/b11f01bda1647020fca68af4f8288303.jpg

 No.1600

File: 1637205725689-0.png (209.43 KB, 576x990, girls have boobs.png)

File: 1637205725689-1.png (532.55 KB, 862x1051, ClipboardImage.png)

>>1598
see pics related, big breasts isn't bad (and the pic in question isn't even that busty).

 No.1601

>>1600
Big or small isn't bad. Portraying someone flat as busty or busty as flat is equally disrespectful.

 No.1602

File: 1637207046305.jpg (712.45 KB, 1992x1996, astrotrain.jpg)

How's this?

 No.1603


 No.1604

>>1602
Based and pretty good

 No.1605

>>1601
>Nicole Gumball is being disrespected for having a bust
She's literally 2D geometric shapes, technically you should be more angry that her arms aren't noodles.

 No.1606

>>1605
>making big boobies small is bad and makes women/girls feel bad
>making small boobies big is good because it makes my pp hard

 No.1608

>>1606
1) This is derailing the thread, stop
2) Nice strawman - it's a fictional character that has no breasts or genitals to speak of, that's up to the artist, (not to mention the anime parody had her have boobs) - piss off.

 No.1653

>>1605
>>1608
Her husband has a bigger bust. It's an intentional design choice symbolic of her character, and a refreshing change from the animator hornyposting of the 90s.
The anime parody did stylize and add breasts, and they weren't fucking watermelons like that manyakis hack. Other female characters in that episode, like her rival, were stylized with larger chests. It is possible to stylize in less abstract form while retaining character traits beyond hair color and clothing.

>this is derailing

>*continues derail*
ok pavlov-dog

 No.1654

this seems relatively settled but don't make giant parades out of stylistic choices or interpretations of characters unless its a dedicated thread to that kind of artistic critique or whatever

 No.1996

File: 1643511668202-1.jpg (75.08 KB, 990x960, It's so Big map.jpg)

File: 1643511668202-2.jpg (64.69 KB, 955x960, It's so Big H&S.jpg)

File: 1643511668202-3.jpg (172.94 KB, 1910x1920, It's so Big template s2.jpg)

Another meme template to use (pic 1-3 are lo res demo), pic 4 is the bigger res

 No.2150

File: 1646356692819-0.png (17.14 KB, 661x623, lev punch template.png)

File: 1646356692819-1.png (24.46 KB, 661x623, oekaki.png)

Lev Punch Template for anons like pic 2

 No.2237

Can someone edit this to be more SFW and edit out the pussy beherit shit

 No.2275

File: 1648099060965.png (1.13 MB, 1280x953, Tail Wave.png)

>>2237
A coloration based on the original palette would be nice example https://archive.ph/z11QD

 No.2280

File: 1648135887811-0.jpg (449.91 KB, 1190x1200, blank.jpg)

File: 1648135887811-1.jpg (617.93 KB, 1190x1200, Ea5vSbYXsAAxOBR.jpg)


 No.2281

>>2280
more

 No.2316

File: 1648606303374-0.png (351.72 KB, 463x597, Makhnodunk.png)

File: 1648606303374-1.png (383.18 KB, 463x597, Makhnodunk2.png)


 No.2321

=DO IT==

 No.2336


 No.2338

>>2336
the pic /r

 No.3204

File: 1675572237397.png (561.05 KB, 1366x768, 1636507068427.png)

>>1455
10 seconds in Paint

 No.3220

File: 1676898687189.png (477.22 KB, 1366x768, tabby.png)

>>3204
12 seconds in Paint

 No.3221

>>3220
>flat nicole
based

 No.3223

>>3220
>Boob removal
Gay

 No.3244

>>3204
>>3220
very cool
>>3221
>>3223
the dichotomy of man

 No.3391


 No.3506

File: 1686688057604.png (569.64 KB, 1920x1080, NOW KISS CC Ruby.png)

Make them kiss (just move the Cat and Ruby closer, for laughs).

 No.3513

File: 1687412572090.png (3.73 MB, 2706x1756, ClipboardImage.png)

Found this edit of a El Lobo art it was funny.

 No.3516


 No.3554

>>3513
Shit that goes hard

 No.3581

>>1600
You know what, I don't get it.

I am aware people have big boobs, and that's normal. The issue is big boobs are sexualised. I agree with the tumblr post that big boobs aren't inheently sexual, but they are sexualised. That's what happens when you draw not just big boobs, but also cleavage shots, or tight clothes. When people draw big boobs no one has the intent to make it nonsexual.

Also Vivian James is wrong because I know if I used the argument that if the artist intends to draw a character stylistically like a woman they could draw her with more realistic body proportions she'd get hissy about censorship because her entire ideology is about keeping softcore porn in videogames, even games that don't even sell the game as porn.

 No.3590

File: 1689029862094.png (192.29 KB, 640x384, heavy life boobs.png)

>>3581
>The issue is big boobs are sexualised
That is the point yes. Women have boobs and bigger ones are often a sign of 'more' sexual attractiveness, it's literally the reason human females evolved to have breasts that aren't saggy and shrunk when not pregnant, unlike other primates or animals. The material development of society and civilization directly impacted this by providing conditions in which maintaining large breasts outside of pregnancy was feasible. Besides, large breasts are symbolical of femininity for a reason - they're directly related to fertility and the ability to bear and nurse children, a trait of the female sex. This material reality directly influenced societal dialectics through history of nearly every civilization in essence.
>if the artist intends to draw a character stylistically like a woman they could draw her with more realistic body proportions she'd get hissy about censorship
Rubbish, there's been plenty of realistically proportioned women illustrated that people are just fine with, it's the pseudo-moralistic outcry by woke radlibs that are just trying to find something to bitch about as being 'sexist'.
>When people draw big boobs no one has the intent to make it nonsexual
As I said, large breasts are inherently sexual, because they belong to and imply an adult woman with all the implications that has. That being said, unless boobs are the focus, that doesn't make a large-breasted woman only about sex. The old-school Lara Croft was sexy, but her primary appeal wasn't in her boobs, otherwise characters/franchises like Indiana Jones, or Uncharted wouldn't have been just as popular.
>what happens when you draw not just big boobs, but also cleavage shots, or tight clothes.
And? There's nothing wrong with that. Bitching about an illustration being sexy is stupid and is just a convoluted version of slut-shaming, implying that being developed and feminine is somehow bad for women.

 No.3591

>>3581
>When people draw big boobs no one has the intent to make it nonsexual.
Not even when drawing an IRL woman who is actually built like that? Does her real body (not even nipples or something, just the general shape of it) need to be censored to appease prudes who have deemed her body more sexual than someone else's? Not saying you would agree with this but there are people who genuinely do and use the same arguments to justify it.

Women with large breasts get treated differently over it, from the amount of respect people are willing to give them to the ability to find clothes that fit but won't also be deemed slutty.

 No.3592

>>3590
>Bitching about an illustration being sexy is stupid and is just a convoluted version of slut-shaming

No? It's not slut shaming, it's against the male gaze. Video game women aren't this independent woman who wants to be viewed as a woman it's coomerbait.

>there's been plenty of realistically proportioned women illustrated that people are just fine with, it's the pseudo-moralistic outcry by woke radlibs that are just trying to find something to bitch about as being 'sexist'.


I know this is wrong because your refutation is nothing more than a false bandwagon and word salad.

And of course you argue big boobs are inherently sexual, which feels like it proves my point? Drawing women with smaller boobs isn't censorship of sexual expression, it's just a critique of the male gaze. If you can't see a woman with bog boobs without sexualizing her, you admit your view and categorization of women is made by the media produced, so we should desexualize how women are portrayed in video games!

 No.3595

>>3592
>reddit spacing
>"le male gaze"
Yeah ok liberal, thanks for revealing your colors
>Video game women aren't this independent woman who wants to be viewed as a woman it's coomerbait.
What the hell is this inane nonsense supposed to mean? Learn to use commas FFS.
"Videogame women" you say, as if
A) They're not programs on a computer
B) As if all women in games are the same

>I know this is wrong because it hurts my Feels

FTFY
>your refutation is nothing more than a false bandwagon and word salad.
No honey, that's you. Every termin I've used is specific to a definition. The term "false bandwagon" doesn't exist, nor does it make sense. As for salad, that's you being an ignoramus, intentionally or not.
>of course you argue big boobs are inherently sexual
They are, it's literally part of how they developed as sexual characteristics of women over prehistory & history
>it proves my point
No it doesn't, your point is a misinterpretation of the post's opinion on boobs being sexual because you're taking it out of context of the entire post.
>Drawing women with smaller boobs isn't censorship of sexual expression
Correct, it is not, but attacking women illustrated with big honkers, is censorship of such expression, browbeating anyone of any sex doing so.
>just a critique of the male gaze.
No liberal, it's not a critique, just the brainworms of Western ideological babble.
>If you can't see a woman with bog boobs without sexualizing her
If a man sees a woman that is stacked and appreciates it, that isn't "muh male gaze" or "muh media influence" that is a person appreciating her being sexy - women and people in general LIKE being appreciated physically, because we have egos and like to know that we've got something going for us. It's the reason make up exists and why people try to be /fit/ because natural selective processes involve physical traits of attractiveness as being part of finding a partner. Appreciation of the physical is not negative, and this castrated way of thinking that having sexual thoughts about a big breasted women is bad, is exactly the problem that tumblr post is talking about - some janked up, thirdwave feminist idea that "Being womanly and sexy is bad because men like that", since clearly liking someone's looks in a normal manner is now heinous! Ridiculous. The irony is that it's also reactionary, since this bitching about sexualization and big boobs is something that was the role of hyper-conservatives in the past.
>you admit your view and categorization of women is made by the media produced
Nope, My appreciation of women began with the women around me, long before I was exposed to outside sexualizations of women in media. I was raised to respect women and to recognize and appreciate their beauty and differences from men, and appreciating a woman's melon's is perfectly fine. Your nonsense seems to imply that by liking tits there's nothing else to a woman that people see. Sorry but if a woman's a bitch, I don't care about her rack very much, the same thing in reverse, I'm not going to be mad that a girl that is kind to me may not have big tits, since, as a civilized human I'm not ruled by physical attraction as the only reason to like or love someone.

TL;DR: Big boobs isn't bad, liking them isn't bad and shaming women for having them, or people for liking and illustrating them is nothing more than pearl-clutching nonsense.

PS. If you think people like big tits and only that about female characters, then you wouldn't see the One Piece fans bitching about Nami having huge ones after timeskip and how all the women in Post-TS One Piece all look like the same generic big tit girl. Clearly big boobs aren't lacking so what else could their "male gaze" be looking for?

 No.3596

>>3595
>TL;DR: Big boobs isn't bad, liking them isn't bad and shaming women for having them, or people for liking and illustrating them is nothing more than pearl-clutching nonsense.
NTA but shaming women for having big boobs (and/or other specific features) is really really fucking common and it is a lot more than pearl-clutching nonsense (in a bad way).

 No.3597

>>3596
By pearl-clutching nonsense I mean the motivations behind it (a mix of jealousy, self-loathing, libideology-poisoning and other selfish reasons). The actions taken in shaming such women are absolutely worse, I agree.

 No.3598

>>3597
There's also a lot of misogyny and predatory inclinations (ask any woman and they start dealing with this type of shit as teenagers).

 No.3599

>>3595
Thanks for removing yourself from the gene pool!

 No.3600

>>3598
>There's also a lot of misogyny and predatory inclinations
True to an extent
>ask any woman and they start dealing with this type of shit as teenagers
Yeah no. While both happen, "all women experience muh sex pests and misogyny" is not true, especially in most developed countries. I've been to Europe, Russia and the USA and have relatives and friends, male and female in China and the rest of the former USSR, as well as other locations. I've neither seen nor heard from almost any of the women that they all get such treatment. This also happens to men and boys as well, it's just not considered socially appropriate for men to complain about harassment for men - for example I got harassed by a man who wanted to pay me for sex, my Uncle was once driving with someone to New York on the Highway and the guy just started Jerking it while steering and my Uncle couldn't do anything because losing control would have resulted in a car crash - this is not indicative of all or even most men and frankly outside of shady areas you don't see this with all women either, even if it happens more with them.

>>3599
If your delusions make you sleep better at night, who am I to deny you?

 No.3601

>>3600
>"all women experience muh sex pests and misogyny" is not true, especially in most developed countries
You're confusing the notion that all women deal with this and the notion that all men are responsible for it. There are too many weirdos out there that very few people of any gender don't experience it. We weren't talking about men being sexualized so nobody brought that up but yeah it happens to us too.

 No.3602

>>3595
Oh man you replied to like, a few sentences with a goddamn paragraph I know damn well you don't have an argument and are just mad.

Sorry, but the breast reduction surgery will continue

 No.3603

File: 1689130203129.png (2.88 MB, 1500x1500, ClipboardImage.png)

>>3601
>There are too many weirdos out there that very few people of any gender don't experience it.
Don't disagree with that at all, just pointing out that it's more of a "there's always assholes" problem rather than just a sexism problem.

>>3602
>Translation: I CAN'T READ SO I DISMISS YOUR ARGUMENT!
Ok /pol/ thanks for stopping by, go back now.
>the breast reduction surgery will continue
<We'll force this attitude!
Ok, fascist.

 No.3604

>>3603
Thank you for calling me a fascist, I needed extra confirmation to know I'm right and you're just chimping out while making shitty excuses for "freedom of expression" and "diverse body types"

 No.3605

>>3604
>Get called out for pushing /pol/ rhetoric
<Get Mad
<Project your aping out by accusing the other person of chimping out
<proceed to use more /pol/ rhetoric in the process
LMAO.

 No.3612

>>3605
I wanna know what school of debate you went to where calling someone mad and saying they are "using /pol/ rhetoric" without elaborating beyond a vague sense of freedom of expression meant you won the argument

Like oh I'm sorry you can't handle the concept of the male gaze. I know goddamn well even if I was mad that I'm right. I don't want to- or need to argue dissecting your points because your whole rhetoric is just replying with ad hominem and tu quoque.

I'm sorry you have to hear this but big booby women in video games aren't inherently a diverse body type. There actually would be more body type diversity if there were less big tiddy women in video games, and that's what Vivian James and you missed.

 No.3613

File: 1689468733239.png (4.07 MB, 1638x2048, ClipboardImage.png)

>>3612
>saying they are "using /pol/ rhetoric" without elaborating
1) You're the one that replied with what amounts to "I can't read", a typical /pol/ rhetoric to /leftypol/ posts that aren't 3 sentences or less.
2) You propagate some arrogant nonsense about 'le breast reductions' implying a support for shaming large breasts and encouraging what is essentially bodily mutilation, and then when I point this out, you claim I'm supporting "diverse body-types" also a /pol/ criticism.
3) Finally your gaslighting with a strawman of my argument about "hurr you're supporting muh freedom of expression"

>Like oh I'm sorry

Go back
>can't handle the concept of the male gaze
Nope, I just don't buy into radical liberal, intersectional idpol delusions
>I know goddamn well even if I was mad that I'm right
SO you admit you're assblasted then? Also only a fool 'knows' themselves to know "the truth"
>I don't want to- or need to argue dissecting your points
There's that /pol/ deflection again.
>your whole rhetoric is just replying with ad hominem and tu quoque.
Patently untrue, but then you have demonstrated no reading comprehension and instead just spam buzzphrases that are vaguely relevant to the topic, without understanding them or utilizing them correctly.
>I'm sorry you
I'm sorry your mother isn't making sure you don't post on sites for people above the age of 15 since clearly you have no idea how to speak like an adult.
>big booby women in video games aren't inherently a diverse body type
You haven't shifted the goalposts, you've just thrown them into space.
1) Yes they are, as they are a type of body type among MANY different body types for female characters in games or other media
2) Diverse body types is not the issue of contention, the issue is "muh sexualization" which is also a disingenuous cherry-picked argument basing itself solely on toxic bourg-feminist ideology
>here actually would be more body type diversity if there were less big tiddy women in video games
<You can't have big boob women in games because that means that somehow that stops other women with other body types from being in them
Never played Overwatch in my life but I can name about 5 female characters with radically different body types and appearances, big-breasted characters haven't stopped any others from existing, you're just mad.
>that's what Vivian James and you missed.
No honey, that's your schizophrenia and ideological brainworms, take your meds

TL;DR: Hello, Ms. Kettle? Ms. Pot called and told me to tell you, you're black too!

 No.3628

>>3613
hubba hubba hubba hubba hubba hubba

 No.3945

women with cleavage will not be allowed under the regime unless it's for porn. Women should dress however they want but to push for women to be as attention grabbing and scantily clothed as possible goes against much of how normal women dress in society and promotes bourgeois ideas of sex work.
>>3613
Any rhetoric to call my argument puritan or reactionary is not materialist, neither logical nor dialectical. The women will be realistic, the clothing WILL be traditional, the fanservice WILL be banned, you WILL SEETHE

 No.3969

File: 1697494692375.png (Spoiler Image, 6.29 MB, 3000x3000, 1692656899390.png)

Reposting for an anon

Can someone edit the text out?

 No.3971

File: 1697512102176.png (Spoiler Image, 5.7 MB, 3000x3000, 1692656899390.png)

>>3969
Here you go babes xoxo

 No.3973

>>3945
you will never breed a woman

 No.3976

>>3973
NTA but you realize it's a satirical shitpost right?

>>3971
LOL

 No.3992

File: 1698076641270.png (749.24 KB, 926x910, cut nagatoro.png)

Can someone cut it to just be Nagatoro on a transparent background? thanks

 No.3993

File: 1698076989831.png (468.92 KB, 926x910, 1698076641270.png)


 No.3994

>>3993
Damn that was fast, did you use Gimp?

 No.3995

>>3994
Yes, I used the path tool.

 No.4073

File: 1702574968142.png (Spoiler Image, 6.37 MB, 3000x3000, fixed.png)

>>3969
I took a little more time on this one I think you'll like it ;)

 No.4075

>>4073
You forgot the part around Weiss's hair.

 No.4081

>>4075
It adds to the flavor. I don't expect you to get it.

 No.4085

File: 1702596875937.jpg (71.38 KB, 891x500, curious kek.jpg)


 No.4152

File: 1705446066790.jpeg (74.48 KB, 1004x965, 1702424433627.jpeg)


 No.4161

File: 1705473803807.png (630.11 KB, 405x720, ClipboardImage.png)

>>3220
>>3204
>>1590
I come with a canon scene from Gumball… Nicole is indeed busty


Unique IPs: 30

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / wiki / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru / zine ]