>>3592>reddit spacing>"le male gaze"
Yeah ok liberal, thanks for revealing your colors>Video game women aren't this independent woman who wants to be viewed as a woman it's coomerbait.
What the hell is this inane nonsense supposed to mean? Learn to use commas FFS.
"Videogame women" you say, as if
A) They're not programs on a computer
B) As if all women in games are the same
>I know this is wrong because it hurts my Feels
FTFY>your refutation is nothing more than a false bandwagon and word salad.
No honey, that's you. Every termin I've used is specific to a definition. The term "false bandwagon" doesn't exist, nor does it make sense. As for salad, that's you being an ignoramus, intentionally or not. >of course you argue big boobs are inherently sexual
They are, it's literally part of how they developed as sexual characteristics of women over prehistory & history>it proves my point
No it doesn't, your point is a misinterpretation of the post's opinion on boobs being sexual because you're taking it out of context of the entire post. >Drawing women with smaller boobs isn't censorship of sexual expression
Correct, it is not, but attacking women illustrated with big honkers, is censorship of such expression, browbeating anyone of any sex doing so. >just a critique of the male gaze.
No liberal, it's not a critique, just the brainworms of Western ideological babble. >If you can't see a woman with bog boobs without sexualizing her
If a man sees a woman that is stacked and appreciates it, that isn't "muh male gaze" or "muh media influence" that is a person appreciating her being sexy - women and people in general LIKE being appreciated physically, because we have egos and like to know that we've got something going for us. It's the reason make up exists and why people try to be /fit/ because natural selective processes involve physical traits of attractiveness as being part of finding a partner. Appreciation of the physical is not negative, and this castrated way of thinking that having sexual thoughts about a big breasted women is bad, is exactly the problem that tumblr post is talking about - some janked up, thirdwave feminist idea that "Being womanly and sexy is bad because men like that", since clearly liking someone's looks in a normal manner is now heinous! Ridiculous. The irony is that it's also reactionary, since this bitching about sexualization and big boobs is something that was the role of hyper-conservatives in the past. >you admit your view and categorization of women is made by the media produced
Nope, My appreciation of women began with the women around me, long before I was exposed to outside sexualizations of women in media. I was raised to respect women and to recognize and appreciate their beauty and differences from men, and appreciating a woman's melon's is perfectly fine. Your nonsense seems to imply that by liking tits there's nothing else to a woman that people see. Sorry but if a woman's a bitch, I don't care about her rack very much, the same thing in reverse, I'm not going to be mad that a girl that is kind to me may not have big tits, since, as a civilized human I'm not ruled by physical attraction as the only reason to like or love someone.
TL;DR: Big boobs isn't bad, liking them isn't bad and shaming women for having them, or people for liking and illustrating them is nothing more than pearl-clutching nonsense.
PS. If you think people like big tits and only that about female characters, then you wouldn't see the One Piece fans bitching about Nami having huge ones after timeskip and how all the women in Post-TS One Piece all look like the same generic big tit girl. Clearly big boobs aren't lacking so what else could their "male gaze" be looking for?