Edit Thread Post, request and make image and drawing edits and colorations. Instructions and templates also welcome.
Requestfags:
>Spoiler NSFW content >Be specific as possible so you get your request right the first time, that means really pour over your pic and think about it>Don't complain too much about the final product, after all you're getting your request for free whereas most artists not only charge money, but would also be too moralfag to edit another artist's work >Try and find the highest resolution of the pic as you can, because not only are you getting better quality, you're also helping make more accurate edits >Post your request with names/authors/copyrights, references and links in one post. Cite the image sourceEditfags:
>You should probably use Photoshop, and make special use of the 'spot healing brush' tool when it comes to removal requests. >ALWAYS save as .png ; everytime you save as .jpg/.jpeg the final product LOSES quality and data. Stop this shit, please. Doesn't matter if the original pic you're editing was in .jpg/.jpeg format, you save as .png because it's lossless>If you have to make a transparent crop/edit whatever of a specific character/object on a layer, always save the individual layers seperately for upload before saving the whole thing together for the final product to be uploaded. This accomplishes multiple things: 1. it allows different backgrounds and such to be edited in for later and 2. It allows either you, another editfag, or the requester to go back and change something if you didn't quite do the request right the first time. No one wants to layer-via-cut the main character and merge it with the background only for the requester to ask that you go back and do it again because it wasn't the background they wanted, because then you have to cut the lines YET AGAIN and that would be tedious; don't forget to upload the layers as seperate files when you're done >Upload your delivery/edit onto the booru(s) https://colordump.booru.org https://4edit.booru.org/index.php?page=post&s=list
>How to do a color edit- Open your preferred image editor.
- Apply "multiply mode" on layer 1 (the original picture).
- Apply colors on layer 2 (below layer 1).
>How to remove colors: - Open in GIMP, add alpha channel,
- Select by color and delete.
can also use Paint Tool SAI2
https://codegesse.tumblr.com/post/88385184105 Lefty Templates:
https://lefty.booru.org/index.php?page=post&s=list&tags=template Elzi Templates:
https://e-hentai.org/g/1503365/43b7716a64/
>*Beginner's guide to color editing with GIMP: https://desuarchive.org/trash/thread/25775373/#25846796 https://desuarchive.org/trash/thread/25775373/#25846844 https://desuarchive.org/trash/thread/25775373/#25846951 >>1229yep
>>1230>A bit surprised they didn't set the site to play the Ghostbusters theme in the background but that would be really obnoxious.this kek
>>16061) This is derailing the thread, stop
2) Nice strawman - it's a fictional character that has no breasts or genitals to speak of, that's up to the artist, (not to mention the anime parody had her have boobs) - piss off.
>>1605>>1608Her husband has a bigger bust. It's an intentional design choice symbolic of her character, and a refreshing change from the animator hornyposting of the 90s.
The anime parody
did stylize and add breasts, and they weren't fucking watermelons like that manyakis hack. Other female characters in that episode, like her rival, were stylized with larger chests.
It is possible to stylize in less abstract form while retaining character traits beyond hair color and clothing.
>this is derailing>*continues derail*ok pavlov-dog
>>3204>>3220very cool
>>3221>>3223the dichotomy of man
>>1600You know what, I don't get it.
I am aware people have big boobs, and that's normal. The issue is big boobs are sexualised. I agree with the tumblr post that big boobs aren't inheently sexual, but they are sexualised. That's what happens when you draw not just big boobs, but also cleavage shots, or tight clothes. When people draw big boobs no one has the intent to make it nonsexual.
Also Vivian James is wrong because I know if I used the argument that if the artist intends to draw a character stylistically like a woman they could draw her with more realistic body proportions she'd get hissy about censorship because her entire ideology is about keeping softcore porn in videogames, even games that don't even sell the game as porn.
>>3581>The issue is big boobs are sexualised That is the point yes. Women have boobs and bigger ones are often a sign of 'more' sexual attractiveness, it's literally the reason human females evolved to have breasts that aren't saggy and shrunk when not pregnant, unlike other primates or animals. The material development of society and civilization directly impacted this by providing conditions in which maintaining large breasts outside of pregnancy was feasible. Besides, large breasts are symbolical of femininity for a reason - they're directly related to fertility and the ability to bear and nurse children, a trait of the female sex. This material reality directly influenced societal dialectics through history of nearly every civilization in essence.
>if the artist intends to draw a character stylistically like a woman they could draw her with more realistic body proportions she'd get hissy about censorshipRubbish, there's been plenty of realistically proportioned women illustrated that people are just fine with, it's the pseudo-moralistic outcry by woke radlibs that are just trying to find something to bitch about as being 'sexist'.
>When people draw big boobs no one has the intent to make it nonsexual As I said, large breasts are inherently sexual, because they belong to and imply an adult woman with all the implications that has. That being said, unless boobs are the focus, that doesn't make a large-breasted woman only about sex. The old-school Lara Croft was sexy, but her primary appeal wasn't in her boobs, otherwise characters/franchises like Indiana Jones, or Uncharted wouldn't have been just as popular.
>what happens when you draw not just big boobs, but also cleavage shots, or tight clothes. And? There's nothing wrong with that. Bitching about an illustration being sexy is stupid and is just a convoluted version of slut-shaming, implying that being developed and feminine is somehow bad for women.
>>3581>When people draw big boobs no one has the intent to make it nonsexual.Not even when drawing an IRL woman who is actually built like that? Does her real body (not even nipples or something, just the general shape of it) need to be censored to appease prudes who have deemed her body more sexual than someone else's? Not saying you would agree with this but there are people who genuinely do and use the same arguments to justify it.
Women with large breasts get treated differently over it, from the amount of respect people are willing to give them to the ability to find clothes that fit but won't also be deemed slutty.
>>3590>Bitching about an illustration being sexy is stupid and is just a convoluted version of slut-shamingNo? It's not slut shaming, it's against the male gaze. Video game women aren't this independent woman who wants to be viewed as a woman it's coomerbait.
>there's been plenty of realistically proportioned women illustrated that people are just fine with, it's the pseudo-moralistic outcry by woke radlibs that are just trying to find something to bitch about as being 'sexist'.I know this is wrong because your refutation is nothing more than a false bandwagon and word salad.
And of course you argue big boobs are inherently sexual, which feels like it proves my point? Drawing women with smaller boobs isn't censorship of sexual expression, it's just a critique of the male gaze. If you can't see a woman with bog boobs without sexualizing her, you admit your view and categorization of women is made by the media produced, so we should desexualize how women are portrayed in video games!
>>3592>reddit spacing>"le male gaze"Yeah ok liberal, thanks for revealing your colors
>Video game women aren't this independent woman who wants to be viewed as a woman it's coomerbait. What the hell is this inane nonsense supposed to mean? Learn to use commas FFS.
"Videogame women" you say, as if
A) They're not programs on a computer
B) As if all women in games are the same
>I know this is wrong because it hurts my FeelsFTFY
>your refutation is nothing more than a false bandwagon and word salad. No honey, that's you. Every termin I've used is specific to a definition. The term "false bandwagon" doesn't exist, nor does it make sense. As for salad, that's you being an ignoramus, intentionally or not.
>of course you argue big boobs are inherently sexual They are, it's literally part of how they developed as sexual characteristics of women over prehistory & history
>it proves my point No it doesn't, your point is a misinterpretation of the post's opinion on boobs being sexual because you're taking it out of context of the entire post.
>Drawing women with smaller boobs isn't censorship of sexual expression Correct, it is not, but attacking women illustrated with big honkers, is censorship of such expression, browbeating anyone of any sex doing so.
>just a critique of the male gaze.No liberal, it's not a critique, just the brainworms of Western ideological babble.
>If you can't see a woman with bog boobs without sexualizing her If a man sees a woman that is stacked and appreciates it, that isn't "muh male gaze" or "muh media influence" that is a person appreciating her being sexy - women and people in general LIKE being appreciated physically, because we have egos and like to know that we've got something going for us. It's the reason make up exists and why people try to be /fit/ because natural selective processes involve physical traits of attractiveness as being part of finding a partner. Appreciation of the physical is not negative, and this castrated way of thinking that having sexual thoughts about a big breasted women is bad, is exactly the problem that tumblr post is talking about - some janked up, thirdwave feminist idea that "Being womanly and sexy is bad because men like that", since clearly liking someone's looks in a normal manner is now heinous! Ridiculous. The irony is that it's also reactionary, since this bitching about sexualization and big boobs is something that was the role of hyper-conservatives in the past.
>you admit your view and categorization of women is made by the media produced Nope, My appreciation of women began with the women around me, long before I was exposed to outside sexualizations of women in media. I was raised to respect women and to recognize and appreciate their beauty and differences from men, and appreciating a woman's melon's is perfectly fine. Your nonsense seems to imply that by liking tits there's nothing else to a woman that people see. Sorry but if a woman's a bitch, I don't care about her rack very much, the same thing in reverse, I'm not going to be mad that a girl that is kind to me may not have big tits, since, as a civilized human I'm not ruled by physical attraction as the only reason to like or love someone.
TL;DR: Big boobs isn't bad, liking them isn't bad and shaming women for having them, or people for liking and illustrating them is nothing more than pearl-clutching nonsense.
PS. If you think people like big tits and only that about female characters, then you wouldn't see the One Piece fans bitching about Nami having huge ones after timeskip and how all the women in Post-TS One Piece all look like the same generic big tit girl. Clearly big boobs aren't lacking so what else could their "male gaze" be looking for?
>>3598 >There's also a lot of misogyny and predatory inclinations True to an extent
>ask any woman and they start dealing with this type of shit as teenagers Yeah no. While both happen, "all women experience muh sex pests and misogyny" is not true, especially in most developed countries. I've been to Europe, Russia and the USA and have relatives and friends, male and female in China and the rest of the former USSR, as well as other locations. I've neither seen nor heard from almost any of the women that they all get such treatment. This also happens to men and boys as well, it's just not considered socially appropriate for men to complain about harassment for men - for example I got harassed by a man who wanted to pay me for sex, my Uncle was once driving with someone to New York on the Highway and the guy just started Jerking it while steering and my Uncle couldn't do anything because losing control would have resulted in a car crash - this is not indicative of all or even most men and frankly outside of shady areas you don't see this with all women either, even if it happens more with them.
>>3599 If your delusions make you sleep better at night, who am I to deny you?
>>3595Oh man you replied to like, a few sentences with a goddamn paragraph I know damn well you don't have an argument and are just mad.
Sorry, but the breast reduction surgery will continue
>>3601>There are too many weirdos out there that very few people of any gender don't experience it. Don't disagree with that at all, just pointing out that it's more of a "there's always assholes" problem rather than just a sexism problem.
>>3602 >Translation: I CAN'T READ SO I DISMISS YOUR ARGUMENT!Ok /pol/ thanks for stopping by, go back now.
>the breast reduction surgery will continue <We'll force this attitude!Ok, fascist.
>>3605I wanna know what school of debate you went to where calling someone mad and saying they are "using /pol/ rhetoric" without elaborating beyond a vague sense of freedom of expression meant you won the argument
Like oh I'm sorry you can't handle the concept of the male gaze. I know goddamn well even if I was mad that I'm right. I don't want to- or need to argue dissecting your points because your whole rhetoric is just replying with ad hominem and tu quoque.
I'm sorry you have to hear this but big booby women in video games aren't inherently a diverse body type. There actually would be more body type diversity if there were less big tiddy women in video games, and that's what Vivian James and you missed.
>>3612>saying they are "using /pol/ rhetoric" without elaborating 1) You're the one that replied with what amounts to "I can't read", a typical /pol/ rhetoric to /leftypol/ posts that aren't 3 sentences or less.
2) You propagate some arrogant nonsense about 'le breast reductions' implying a support for shaming large breasts and encouraging what is essentially bodily mutilation, and then when I point this out, you claim I'm supporting "diverse body-types" also a /pol/ criticism.
3) Finally your gaslighting with a strawman of my argument about "hurr you're supporting muh freedom of expression"
>Like oh I'm sorryGo back
>can't handle the concept of the male gaze Nope, I just don't buy into radical liberal, intersectional idpol delusions
>I know goddamn well even if I was mad that I'm right SO you admit you're assblasted then? Also only a fool 'knows' themselves to know "the truth"
>I don't want to- or need to argue dissecting your points There's that /pol/ deflection again.
>your whole rhetoric is just replying with ad hominem and tu quoque.Patently untrue, but then you have demonstrated no reading comprehension and instead just spam buzzphrases that are vaguely relevant to the topic, without understanding them or utilizing them correctly.
>I'm sorry youI'm sorry your mother isn't making sure you don't post on sites for people above the age of 15 since clearly you have no idea how to speak like an adult.
>big booby women in video games aren't inherently a diverse body type You haven't shifted the goalposts, you've just thrown them into space.
1) Yes they are, as they are a type of body type among MANY different body types for female characters in games or other media
2) Diverse body types is not the issue of contention, the issue is "muh sexualization" which is also a disingenuous cherry-picked argument basing itself solely on toxic bourg-feminist ideology
>here actually would be more body type diversity if there were less big tiddy women in video games <You can't have big boob women in games because that means that somehow that stops other women with other body types from being in themNever played Overwatch in my life but I can name about 5 female characters with radically different body types and appearances, big-breasted characters haven't stopped any others from existing, you're just mad.
>that's what Vivian James and you missed. No honey, that's your schizophrenia and ideological brainworms, take your meds
TL;DR: Hello, Ms. Kettle? Ms. Pot called and told me to tell you, you're black too!
women with cleavage will not be allowed under the regime unless it's for porn. Women should dress however they want but to push for women to be as attention grabbing and scantily clothed as possible goes against much of how normal women dress in society and promotes bourgeois ideas of sex work.
>>3613Any rhetoric to call my argument puritan or reactionary is not materialist, neither logical nor dialectical. The women will be realistic, the clothing WILL be traditional, the fanservice WILL be banned, you WILL SEETHE
>>3973NTA but you realize it's a satirical shitpost right?
>>3971LOL
>>4579I'll probably use it for some concepts I was working on, but honestly I just liked how well illustrated the jaws were and the implication behind them.
>>4578 >an unironic fulfilment of the request<it's well doneDamn, nice work even if wasn't my request.
Unique IPs: 32