/draw/ - Original Art

>gifs
lrn2webm

>I use mpv, kdenlive and imagemagick
Patrician.

>>1388
Not OP but I use ffmpeg. It's tedious as fuck but at least I don't have to download more programs.

>>1389
I just use ffmpeg too unless there's original editing needed.

>>1388
>lrn2webm
making sure shit can encode webm (and other formats) is my job. but webm will never dethrone GIF

>>1389
ffmpeg is not as good at encoding GIFs as imagemagick. maybe one day I'll get around to improving its encoder. which in practice means improving the paletteuse filter

>>1391
Your GIFs look glorious, ngl. My shit GIFs I made with ffmpeg can't compare

>>1391
>making sure shit can encode webm (and other formats) is my job
how to get a job like this

>>1393
get into broadcast backend stuff. learn to love 80+ year old quirks of the TV industry

>>1394
>learn to love 80+ year old quirks of the TV industry
heh, "interlacing"

(I've been involved in a cartoon archival project and all the formats and encoding quirks are a pain.)

>>1395
yeah interlacing is one of the pains. you have top field first vs bottom field first. sometimes video is interlaced but not marked as such in the metadata. also things like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-two_pull_down
another pain is pixel formats, especially when combined with interlacing. fun times if someone has converted 4:2:2 to 4:2:0 incorrectly. upshot is that this creates lots of billable hours
I heard there was a higher res release of MLaaTR recently but for some reason it's cropped to 16:9 >:(

>>1396
Oh that three-two pull down looks like a mess. Converting FPS in general is understandably horrible.
Cropping of new releases is a serious problem. There have been many times they've gotten excited for a new release just to find it's somehow worse than the previous ones, whether it be low-effort remastering, cropping/panning to 16:9, dropped frames, you name it. In rare cases they've actually found a source that does everything great except for a couple of messed up scenes, so they make a release from two sources.

As a side note, this may be of some interest: a recent Ed, Edd 'n' Eddy 2160p AI upscale.
https://www.reddit.com/r/ededdneddy/comments/n6whqz/ed_edd_n_eddy_definitive_edition/ or https://teddit.net/r/ededdneddy/comments/n6whqz/ed_edd_n_eddy_definitive_edition/
3rd party downscale to 1080p x265 torrent for easier download:
S1 https://www.1377x.to/torrent/4946434/Ed-Edd-n-Eddy-1999-Season-1-S01-1080p-AI4K-x265-HEVC-10bit-AC3-2-0-English-French-ImE-QxR/
S2 https://www.1377x.to/torrent/4966222/Ed-Edd-n-Eddy-1999-Season-2-S02-1080p-AI4K-x265-HEVC-10bit-AC3-2-0-English-French-ImE-QxR/

>>1397
>upscaling
but, this is reminding me to watch EE&E

got inspired, made this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKmDGWv9gRk
Can you do a gif of Tracy doing that jerk at 1:32?

>>1400
here you go anon. made two versions, one with fixed dither and one with no dither

>>1400
figured out how to use ffmpeg's bayer dithering with a custom palette. this one looks best IMO

>>1402
Isn't this sped up?

>>1403
it's just under 24 fps, so no. unless I fucked up in kdenlive

>>1403
it's probably faster than the other two because imagemagick only allows integers for -delay, and I used a delay of 5, meaning 50 ms -> 20 fps
ffmpeg is smarter and computes GIF frame delays from timestamps

>>1401
>>1402
Thanks this will make a great reaction picture.

A Nazi drew an artwork today.

Did you?

>>1407
I don't draw I just encood

I had a great idea for a reaction GIF earlier today and I can't remember what it was >:(