Political Ideology Catgirls

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Options
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

Political Ideology Catgirls Anonymous 2021-12-09 (Thu) 01:14:50 No.1728

anyone remember this? it was cute

Anonymous 2021-12-09 (Thu) 01:26:14 No.1729

What happened to the artist?

Anonymous 2021-12-09 (Thu) 01:55:35 No.1730

>>1729
i guess they moved on

Anonymous 2021-12-09 (Thu) 06:23:12 No.1732

File: 1639030992546-0.png (4.25 KB, 226x223, download (70).png)

File: 1639030992547-1.jpg (55.09 KB, 646x422, 9251c1e23f9bcfe6195095eb9f….jpg)

>>1728
>>When is there going to be a red army faction catgirl?

Anonymous 2021-12-10 (Fri) 00:22:18 No.1742

>>1729
I think she had IRL matters to deal with, and after already getting harassed by reddit over making catgirl art, I can't blame her.

Anonymous 2021-12-10 (Fri) 01:19:48 No.1743

File: 1639099187951.png (294.8 KB, 1920x1080, ClipboardImage.png)

>>1742
Man, fucking reddit faggotry.

Anonymous 2021-12-10 (Fri) 02:18:06 No.1744

>>1743
Imageboards do the exact same thing all the fucking time too.

Anonymous 2022-02-15 (Tue) 20:49:41 No.2065

Sanrizuka Struggle catgirl tho

Anonymous 2022-02-15 (Tue) 20:55:35 No.2066

File: 1644958535669.jpg (247.21 KB, 878x932, 20220214_091943.jpg)

Anonymous 2022-02-16 (Wed) 07:17:40 No.2067

File: 1644995859640-0.jpg (26.89 KB, 474x355, OIP (2).jpg)

File: 1644995859640-1.jpg (75.03 KB, 474x627, OIP (3).jpg)

>>2065
first we have Baader–Meinhof Group catgirl ok

Anonymous 2022-02-16 (Wed) 08:04:38 No.2069

>>1743
Has anyone still got the video version of this?

Anonymous 2022-02-17 (Thu) 01:43:28 No.2077

File: 1645062208467.webm (1.98 MB, 854x480, you're golden.webm)

>>2069

DUDE 2022-02-17 (Thu) 03:25:04 No.2078

File: 1645068304134.jpeg (71.86 KB, 477x504, bbbd8c85a37755ec76cb70c39….jpeg)

>>1728
one dude on /get/ asked me to draw her eating an apple

DUDE 2022-02-17 (Thu) 03:25:20 No.2079

File: 1645068319514-0.jpeg (65.13 KB, 712x1118, 1.jpeg)

File: 1645068319514-1.jpeg (63.25 KB, 864x843, 2.jpeg)

File: 1645068319514-2.jpg (52.25 KB, 544x867, 3.jpg)

File: 1645068319514-3.jpg (78.21 KB, 864x1536, 4.jpg)

File: 1645068319514-4.jpg (263.81 KB, 864x1536, 5.jpg)

>>2078

Anonymous 2022-02-17 (Thu) 03:25:49 No.2080

>>2077
>>1743
thinking that capitalism is "more realistic" isn't too sus, they could just be a confused prole that needs more conversation and convincing
meanwhile someone that thinks racism or patriarchy don't exist while claiming to be a "socialist" is probably actively reactionary and ignorant

Anonymous 2022-02-17 (Thu) 04:06:03 No.2082

>>2079
Give me that apple.

Anonymous 2022-02-17 (Thu) 04:28:16 No.2083

>>2080
>someone who doesn't believe in patriarchy is "probably actively reactionary"
>saying this even ironically
idpozzed rablib hands made this post

Anonymous 2022-02-17 (Thu) 04:34:09 No.2084

>>2083
Your kind all speak the same while thinking nobody is going to notice.

Anonymous 2022-02-17 (Thu) 04:38:13 No.2085

>>2084
are the probably actively reactionary people in the room with us right now

Anonymous 2022-02-17 (Thu) 08:09:05 No.2086

>>2085
yes, they're shitting on the floor very loudly too

Anonymous 2022-02-17 (Thu) 08:10:28 No.2087

>>2083
>>2085
you cant post exactly like a poltard and then get mad when getting called out tbh

Anonymous 2022-02-17 (Thu) 12:39:09 No.2088

File: 1645101549055.png (449.63 KB, 1322x968, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2087
Ah yes, /pol/tards which are famous for not indulging in idpol.

Anonymous 2022-02-18 (Fri) 00:42:25 No.2091

>>2088
Acknowledging that racism/patriarchy exist at all isn't the same as calling people "class reductionist".

Anonymous 2022-02-18 (Fri) 01:45:06 No.2092

>>2091
You're not reading the cap right - it's /pol/ that obsesses about race and sex, not leftypol, that's the point. /pol/ is calling leftypol reductionist for denying idpol.

Anonymous 2022-02-18 (Fri) 01:46:27 No.2093

>>2088
>>2092
The "anti-idpoler" with the best reading comprehension:

Anonymous 2022-02-18 (Fri) 01:55:32 No.2094

>>2091
The average person doesn't believe in the patriarchy. The average person is not "probably actively reactionary." They just don't give a shit about politics. This?
>someone that thinks racism or patriarchy don't exist while claiming to be a "socialist" is probably actively reactionary and ignorant
This is a twitter shitlib take.

Anonymous 2022-02-18 (Fri) 05:48:17 No.2095

>>2094
the "average person" (you probably don't include women in this definition but i will) stuck in an exploitative sexual relationship is very well aware of its existence

Anonymous 2022-02-18 (Fri) 05:50:43 No.2096

>>2094
Nobody was talking about the "average person" (who coincidentally agrees with you on this issue) in the whole thread.

Anonymous 2023-07-24 (Mon) 04:02:17 No.3643

>>2080
<An important part of /leftypol/’s unique character is our opposition to identity politics.
>muh class reductionism!1
Right back to wall with that class denialist absolutely reactionary social-reformative shit. Implying it is not the existence of economic class division that drives all consecutive division of society on more & more identities: races, genders & all the other beloved retarded spooks of yours.