/edu/ - Education

bump

Either you mean Klaus Mann or Hannah Arendt.

>>23380
I love your ramblings, Nazi-chan

>>23380
I don't get what you're implying with the last two sentences,especially considering the ones before

>>12147
>>23380
>>23389
Here's the thing: I don't think Hitler was a mastermind creating any sort of complex theories. I feel people forget he was a homeless guy radicalized by street pamphlets. To me, he was a low-class man who had good oratory ability, but he wasn't particularly intelligent. He would believe most of what he read in his specific choice of media and magazines, yet he spoke very well. The thing is, if it hadn't been Hitler or the Nazis, it would have been some other Fascist force taking power in Germany, a party with enough pro-worker rhetoric for the lower classes but didn't alienate them with anti-nationalism, but who didn't alienate the old nobility and military either

>>23391
this, not to mention bro was fucking geeked most of the time

>>23392
Okay, plenty of guys are like this, and specific conditions led to Hitler being in charge. While I think he was always going to be a nationalist and a radical of some sort, he could have been a regional level Communist nationalist if the conditions were there. That said, I'm not from the West, so I've never really viewed him as Satan incarnate or anything.

>>23394
>Communist nationalist
The shit I have to read here, lmao.

You can tell how cooked the average braindead moron here is when they believe Nazi Germany or any other country depends on their "leaders" choosing the "correct" or "wrong" policy.

>>23391
The nazis were elected by the middle classes (just like any politician), what are you fucking smoking?

>>23391
The thing about hitler and Nazism broadly speaking is that it is socialism of phenomena and not the noumena like marxism is, he saw the Jews which embodied capitalism but are not capitalism itself, just like his racialism, seeing the backwardness of other cultures as a manifestation not of capitalist imperialism but of the people themselves. Nazism is socialism but of the vulgar kind that fails to abstract from the concrete.

>>23398
lower middle classes of Shopkeepers, clerks, small business owners were abstetoyl a strong voter base for Nazis, but they would not have made it anywhere without support of rural, workers and the old aristocracy

>>23402
Again, my point is that there are dozens of quotes from Hitler that an average person on the Internet who supports Communism might find appealing or agree with, but that’s due to the nature of populist, authoritarian, militaristic, and nationalistic state


>"The Third Reich will always retain the right to control property owners. If you say that the bourgeoisie is tearing its hair over the question of private property, that does not affect me in the least. Does the bourgeoisie expect some consideration from me?… Today's bourgeoisie is rotten to the core; it has no ideals any more; all it wants to do is earn money and so it does me what damage it can"

>"National Socialism derived from each of the two camps the pure idea that characterizes it, national resolution from bourgeois tradition; vital, creative socialism from the teaching of Marxism."

>"All the more so after the war, the German National Socialist state, which pursued this goal from the beginning, will tirelessly work for the realization of a program that will ultimately lead to a complete elimination of class differences and to the creation of a true socialist community."

>"Capitalism as a whole will now be destroyed, the whole people will now be free. We are not fighting Jewish or Christian capitalism, we are fighting very capitalism: we are making the people completely free.' … It is only the international Stock Exchange and loan- capital, the so-called 'supra-state capital,' which has profited from the collapse of our economic life, the capital which receives its character from the single supra-state nation which is itself national to the core, which fancies itself to be above all other nations, which places itself above other nations and which already rules over them."

>"In those countries, it is actually capital that rules; that is, nothing more than a clique of a few hundred men who possess untold wealth and, as a consequence of the peculiar structure of their national life, are more or less independent and free. They say: 'Here we have liberty.' By this they mean, above all, an uncontrolled economy, and by an uncontrolled economy, the freedom not only to acquire capital but to make absolutely free use of it. That means freedom from national control or control by the people both in the acquisition of capital and in its employment. This is really what they mean when they speak of liberty. These capitalists create their own press and then speak of the 'freedom of the press.' In reality, every one of the newspapers has a master, and in every case this master is the capitalist, the owner. This master, not the editor, is the one who directs the policy of the paper. If the editor tries to write other than what suits the master, he is ousted the next day. This press, which is the absolutely submissive and characterless slave of the owners, molds public opinion"

>"What Marxism, Leninism, and Stalinism failed to accomplish, we shall be in a position to achieve.”

>“But we National Socialists wish precisely to attract all socialists, even the Communists; we wish to win them over from their international camp to the national one.”

>"What Marxism, Leninism, and Stalinism failed to accomplish, we shall be in a position to achieve.”

>"I have learnt a great deal from Marxism, as I do not hesitate to admit… I don't mean their tiresome social doctrine or the materialist conception of history, or their absurd marginal utility theories and so on. But I have learnt from their methods. The difference between them and myself is that I have really put into practice what these peddlers and pen-pushers have timidly begun. The whole of National Socialism is based on it"

>>23410
Okay, so I'm not European, and I'm not fond of mass migrations to countries because I know they destabilize nations. However, my position on the Jewish question is this: it's almost impossible to pretend they aren't vastly overrepresented in various fields, intelligentsia, entertainment and politics. That doesn't mean they deserve genocide, but I follow the Gumilev school of thought that the Jews should be 'remade' by being placed in a province where they do manual labor for generations and even intermingle with the locals to create a new Jewish race without