No.31479
>>31478your first mistake was reading the dialogues in the bing bing wahoo. if you want a story, read actual fiction. or better yet, don't be a pretentious imbecile and accept entertainment for what it is: entertainment
No.31480
>>31479I don’t think the game devs wanted the game to be purely read as entertainment otherwise they wouldn’t have gone through with half the risks they took with this title. I like this game, I like its gameplay and its story because it reminds me of far cry 2, a game I can look at as an example of games as art.
No.31483
>>31480the only risk is not selling enough copies, moron
>I don’t think the game devs wantedand christians want you to read the bible as a factual account of events. it doesn't matter
No.31491
>>31483this is the kind of retard that brings up "death of the author" literally
No.31493
Seeing all his favorite soldiers eat it must be driving Druckmann insane. I wonder how that's gonna affect Last of Us 3.
No.31498
>>31491never heard of it, had to read the first wikipedia paragraph. of course the pretentious video-games player reads art critics
No.31500
>>31493Didn’t he say that Idf soldiers getting attacked by palestinian civvies is what motivated him to make tlou 2. I imagine he might turn either full psycho after what’s happening or turn into an apologetic lib, like he is rightnow, but less pro idf.
No.31512
>>31509i couldve just called you /v/ermin cancer if the word channer triggers you so much
No.31520
>>31483>the only risk is not selling enough copies, moronThat's the risk of all media have under capitalism, moron.
>>31479>read actual fiction<accept entertainment for what it is: entertainmentWhy read "actual fiction" then?
Seems to be as shallow as video games.