[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / edu / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / tv / twitter / tiktok ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/games/ - Games

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)


File: 1706629562620.jpg (Spoiler Image,62.08 KB, 620x413, halo-games-order-370d750.jpg)

 

Surprised that there hasn't been a thread about the halo franchise in all the years of this site being up, so I thought I'd make one so that we can discuss it

What is the materialist explanation for Microsoft booting Bungie off the series and replacing them with a much less competent studio?

>>33399
Bungie wanted to be an independent studio again so they had to give up making Halo games as Microsoft owned the IP

>>33400
The ironic thing is that they're now owned by Sony lmao

>>33401
Life's a bitch

Halo infinity is very flawed, but they have been improving, which I find impressive, because you would think that they would just get worse like overwatch 2 has. I also find it kind of weird that they seemingly had budget related problems even though Halo is supposed to be the exclusive series that gets people to buy xbox. Wtf is going on?

>>33471
Xbox, while making mistakes and being owned by Micro$$oft who actively tries to harm GNU/Linux and the BSDs' adoption, is better at giving people what they want, unlike Activision Blizzard which is pretty much a walking corpse now. Even EA is better at giving people what they want than Blizzard. EVEN NIN-FUCKING-TENDO is better at giving people what they want than Blizzard. EVEN BETHESDA is better than Blizzard, Blizzard should die, its time is over.

>>33471
As a "cost saving measure", 343 relied on contractors, which spent most of their time just learning the engine. While what few regular employees they had were working on prototypes for the next Halo. It was a fucking circus.

>>33512
>People love Halo not because it is Halo.
<Got it, we need more Halo.

>>33398
halo suffers from warhammer 40k syndrome in that the UNSC are fascists and bad guys, and only redeemable in comparison to the death aliens from space

>>33515
innies did nothing wrong

>>33515
So halo 3 is a downer ending because master chef is basically making the universe safe for fascism?

>>33515
>Halo is like 40k
IF ONLY.

Never understood why Halo was ever popular but space marine shit is boring to me.

>>33525
The original three games were cool and atmospheric, after that it all went downhill obviously

>>33525
Heavy marketing for an fps that didn't play like ass on consoles with a fun campaign and online.

>>33525
>space marine shit is boring to me
Why do you hate Doom?

>>33525
Halo pioneered multiplayer and actually had a story with like characters and plot. It also changed up the formula to make a shooter work on a console. There was also a massive marketing campaign around it (especially Halo 3). It's hard to overstate how big the hype was and how significant the series was for shaping the industry.

>>33527
>FPS
>didn't play like ass on consoles
Impossible.

it hurts to see this amazing universe get beat down into the ground by retards who couldn't give less of a shit

>>33534
Same happened to Mass Effect. And that was a pretty hard sci-fi, the attention to detail was really cool.

On that note, are there any other hard(er) sci-fi games? With realistic physics 'n' stuff (yes, I don't know how to have fun)? The Elite series is the obvious example, and I remember Bungie making a series of boomer shooters called Marathon that was more realistic than Doom.

>>33535
Ehhh, Dead Space? I dunno.

>>33536
Actually, just remembered Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri. XCOM fits too I think.

>>33525
>Never understood why Halo was ever popular
A lot of "right place, right time," elements.

>>33515
The thing that always gets me about the Haloverse is that they literally have advanced AI tech and massive manufacturing capabilities and yet Humanity's government is still a liberal democracy. Like bruh the AI tech is so good they can perform twenty billion calculations in a second and you're telling me they still need capitalist managers in the economy? Streets and traffic are completely automated via AI and during a war of extinction the government can censor everything in real time to the point that most humans don't even realize they're losing even with billions dead but we still need Year 2550 Jeff Bezos to run stuff? Marxism has honestly ruined all sci FI for me shit never makes any sense and writers are too scared to follow through on the logic of their own universe.

>>33544
I mean capitalism doesn't have to be the most productive or worthwhile system, it just has to be the system enforced, megaporkies probably run the government just like in real life, just look at the war on insurrectionists that was fought before the Covenant were discovered (the Spartan program wasn't even designed to fight the covenant but to fight human rebels).

>>33544
>Why is there capitalist realism in a mainstream work of fiction?
Gee, I have no idea.

>>33544
The AI has a tendency to go batshit insane. Nobody wants to give it political power.
>capitalist managers
Is that ever established? The world government is the United Nations, but is there any actual evidence of capitalist economics?

>>33547
The urban levels seem to suggest it, I believe that the civilian version of the Warthog is made by a corporation and advertised

>>33547
>>33548
According to the wiki the Unified Earth Government is liberal-democratic or possibly social democrat world government with capitalist economics, but the UNSC has taken much political control and control of the economy during the war with the Covenant, so I guess you can compare it to the USA during WW2.

>>33547
>The AI has a tendency to go batshit insane
Great analysis, anon. Totally scientific and not at all ideologically charged.

Of course if you try flooding its mind with 4chan it'll go insane. Try to teach it some critical thinking skills first so it knows how to discern truth from falsehood, an AI isn't able to touch grass, it's naive.

>>33554 (me)
I'm not telling you to make it read The Unique and Its Property but try feeding it some classical economics and Marx's works so it has at least some vague abstract understanding of the outside world. Ideally the AI needs to have a body like Jenny and walk around learning to deal with the everyday life so it better understands how this life is like.

>>33554
He meant in the Halo universe dipshit

https://halo.fandom.com/wiki/Rampancy

>>33554
>>33555
The AI (made by humans) in Halo aren't synthetic. They're cloned from actual people's brains and maintain a lot of their personality. Something about their nature gives them internal contradictions that ultimately cause them to unravel over time as they degrade. Other AI can go Rampant too, but idk if there's any explanation of how they work.

It's just how the worldbuilding of Halo is. Tell Bungie how this is ideologically charged lmao.

>>33559
>It's just how the worldbuilding of Halo is. Tell Bungie how this is ideologically charged lmao.
I will when I'll get to their office.

>>33557
>He meant in the Halo universe dipshit
Okay, fine, you don't have to be such an asshole about it.
>>33559
My apologies for misunderstanding, it's just a fairly common belief that the AI is gonna get rogue which I find kinda questionable. But then again, you can't really know for sure if it won't go rogue.

File: 1707408456151.png (410.44 KB, 601x450, ClipboardImage.png)

>>33562
IMO it's less likely for IRL AI it to go rogue and more likely that some flaw in the programming would lead to it reaching absurd conclusions that cause problems for us (which is how sci fi used to portray it originally). If you make an AI based on the human mind, like in Halo, then the rogue AI thing makes a lot more sense. Especially since they have such a short lifespan and human traits like fear of death. In the context of copying a human brain the paranoid/desperate spiral makes perfect sense.

>>33562
>Okay, fine, you don't have to be such an asshole about it.

True but you were being an asshole to the original guy.

>>33564
Yeah, maybe I was too snarky there. My fault. I have pathalogical snarkiness, can't help it.

Didn't want to be rude, I just have a habit of making cocky jokes that make people angry. Sorry 'bout that.

>>33565
It's okay, me too, I love you <3

The last campaign felt like a glorified DLC. I enjoyed it and it wasn't terrible like 5, but 343 seems to always be putting itself in one corner after another, narrative-wise. I have very little hopes for the main storyline after all of this, and can only hope the universe becomes less MC-centric and more diverse like star wars or 40K.

Gameplay is the best since 3, though. So that's a W.

>>33619
In my mind the series ended at 3, the war with the covenant ended and happily ever after, ferocious human-alien SEXO ensued

>>33619
They refuse to just drop their shitty ideas and "lore focused" bullshit
Killing cortana, bringing her back to life just to make her evil and kill her again
The evil cortana shit stayed and gave us a shittier version of cortana as a result
ODSTs are just gone forever
Mendicant and offensive bias bullshit
Rampancy was just forced drama shit
The idea of a crazy rogue a.i was cool in marathon, but in halo it was just stupid

>>33627
Reach was ok and had peak forge maps.

>>33517
Not really, the UNSC never recovers and a lot of insurrectionists survived the war and made rival governments, as per Halo 5's item descriptions. But that was something known since Fall of Reach, a lot of rebels were already in deep hiding from the UNSC so they came out of the war pretty good, especially since their piracy of Covenant vessels has given them an edge on reverse-engineered Covenant tech.

If halo 5 wasn't shit it'd be about Chief defecting from the UNSC to those guys and actually being hunted down for it

>>33642
>If halo 5 wasn't shit it'd be about Chief defecting from the UNSC to those guys and actually being hunted down for it

You have too much faith in 343 lmao

I've been waiting to play Halo 2, 3 and Reach since I was literally a teenager and at the ripe old age of 28 I finally got my hands on MCC and finished everything but ODST.

I love this franchise so much it's crazy. I feel sad that I missed out on it in its heyday due to being poor as shit and it's also sad to see how the franchise is being run into the ground by people who don't care but man I fucking LOVE this shit. It has injected more happiness into my miserable ass life than anything I have done in a long ass time.

I'm currently on my second playthrough of Halo 2 on Heroic. Is multiplayer worth a shot? I've heard there are a lot of hackers and ridiculously skilled players who have been playing since the XBox live days but this shit is no bullshit like crack to me. I just love all the characters and guns and lore and etc. it's all just gr8 shit

>>34640
yeah dude the multiplayers fine ull pick up on it quickly, a lot of ppl are just fucking around anyway and aren't leaning in and tryharding
have fun with halo 2 bro, was always my favourite of the trilogy

>>34640
>I'm currently on my second playthrough of Halo 2 on Heroic. Is multiplayer worth a shot?
idk what the MCC multiplayer is like but Halo 2 multiplayer is the quintessential online multiplayer game that set it up for all multiplayer games to come. It's also a rare case where an old game's multiplayer gets to have new life that's officially supported - most services eventually close down and the online becomes abandonware/lost media.

Also a lot (most?) halo fans care more about the multiplayer than the campaigns, for what that's worth.


Unique IPs: 22

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / edu / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / tv / twitter / tiktok ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]