/games/ - Games

I have this game! Unfortunately I'm terrible at RTS games in general, so I don't play it very often. With that being said I would like to learn how to be a better tactician, that way I'll be able to pulverize NATO legions in-game one day.

Also as a sidenote I'm not sure if I prefer WARNO because of its great sound effects and environments or it's predecessor (Wargame Red Dragon) because it features naval units.

>>36839
I have it, I got through a few missions on the campaign a few months ago, don't know if they've added more yet. The missions aren't that bad because you have limited units and types you to control. Then when you play the regular custom battle stuff the learning curve is so steep because you have to know every unit pretty much and how to design your army. I've only played that with bots so far and it was still super hard.

>>36841
Also they're in the middle of balancing all kinds of stuff. One of the campaign missions was literally impossible because of a re-balance issue that nerfed the special forces. I confirmed the mission was literally impossible on /r/warno

>>36839
I'm tentatively interested but I was never good enough at Wargame to compete online, and apparently WARNO has even worse monetisation anyway

>>36843
>WARNO has even worse monetisation anyway
Yeah, they anounced a shitton of DLC when the game got out of Early Access. I'm afraid Eugen Systems is going to take the path of Paradox.

Well, does anyone want to play?

>>36904
Is there private multiplayer on pirate version?

>>36906
There are already pirate versions? As for if multiplayer is available for it, no idea.

I had the idea that since you can play multiplayer with several players on the same team we could build a clan that exclusively fights for the Soviet side.

>>36909
I mean I'm just assuming you can pirate it.

>>36910
That sounds cool in theory but I bet we would get demolished by the no lifer poltard players

>>36839
Luv me some BRRRguska

So, I did the whole tutorial and lost many of the first battles lol. What I noticed is visibility is crucial. Lost most of my units because the enemy saw me first while I couldn‘t see the enemy. Additionally, you need to keep track of all the diverse units, which I often lost sight of. Zerg rushing type of play style doesn‘t work at all lol, which is good.

I have mixed feelings about it. On the one hand the core gameplay is definitely the best out of all of these games thus far (referring here to Wargame and Steel Division), but the more grounded realistic approach (e.g. sticking to units and nations present in Germany in 1989) takes away a lot of the fun. Part of what gave Red Dragon such replayability was the huge diversity of units, nations, and accompanying playstyles, even if they were laughably unrealistic. Yeah, no shit the DPRK would never face down Sweden in a war, but fuck if it wasn't fun to simulate such a conflict. Tbh I haven't played any NATO decks yet, but honestly thus far all the Pact battlegroups feel pretty similar in a way they did not in Red Dragon.

Anyone plays SURM? Few mod working on my cracked version (btw check https://catalogue.smods.ru/game/warno for mods for cracked)

Also, there's a fix to play red dragon online, if anyone wants to play