2600:1003:b13c- etc.
IP location changes over time.
>>1289495
Well it’s like I said in the OP too, I don’t agree with his take that the future is inevitably dark, that the main uses for technology are horrible and wicked, and that humans specifically enjoy sadism (though I’d say honestly the last one is probably true, I know I have sadistic urges, every ideology including ML and Maoism and even anarchism has committed sadistic acts that can’t be rationally justified, my gf and everyone I know has said sadistic shit at one point or another, people do like killing somewhat)
Imo Chris Hedges is a fellow traveler and that’s all that matters, and you know prior to the internet era and the ability to shelter ourselves in cloistered circlejerks with 0 interactions outside the echo-chamber, people would interact with different and disagreeing ideologies all the time. What matters to me is that Hedges opposes war, autocracy, and capitalism; whether or not he supports countries and political parties that no longer exist just doesn’t matter to me, and it’s not like his opposition to the USSR isn’t a valid position held by a large amount of anticapitalists.
>>1289487
> I've noticed way less 'RETVRN' shit is about being in the 50s where you could spray blacks with a power house and got a 900$ 4-day week job for 30 years, Is now just becoming a bunch of ~80s/90s aesthetic LARPing
It actually makes more sense than you’d think
The 80s and (to a lesser extent) the 90s were a super fucking racist and bigoted time period compared to right now, remember, most (white) kids, teens, and adults were casually racist back then and openly homophobic, women weren’t under a vicious patriarchy like in the 50s but RVTURN fags think they were easier to get back then anyway. The 80s and 90s also include the last great peak of American and Western power and global prestige, and, in our historical memory, the last time American pop culture was unequivocally good in the minds of most.
Honestly I realized a while ago the 80s would be the new 1950s for reactionaries, like the 50s it was a time of immense conservative reaction against a radical wave from the past two decades
> Really 'RETVRN' is just the right-wing equivalent of Avatar : The Noble Savage simulation experience, And Avatar is just Liberal version of 'RETVRN' - Remember those propaganda images asking people to 'RETVRN' to the 90s?, They just want their pastiche.
> After all, Avatar is a story of 'RETVRN', It is a story about someone [who is both physically and emotionally crippled] escaping into the pastiche of noble savagery to escape the fact that from all signs we get, He's living in some sort of fucky Megacorp Cybershart hell universe.
I don’t know if Avatar is a noble savage or RVTURN trope, it’s a clear allegory for what happened to indigenous peoples historically and what’s happening to them presently and honestly I don’t think any story that portrays indigenous people in a positive light deserves to be called a “noble savage depiction”. Idk why the film would be decried by leftists of all people, when it’s actually pretty savage regarding the US military, America’s private industry, and their interests in the Middle East. Honestly I’d defend Avatar as being as radical as Hollywood films can usually get, and don’t have the vested interests other leftists do in just hating whatever is/was popular.
I’d say positives for Avatar:
>Like the majority of Cameron films the main character is working class (Cameron, who began as a truck driver, has always identified with working class characters)
>The villains of the film are the states, companies, and militaries that are destroying the world right now in our time, in the Avatarverse they’re so explicitly imperialist that even in the MC’s lifetime they were fighting colonial wars in Africa
>The film is set up so that the government and military are both dominated by the private company, RDA; who funds the voyage to Pandora NOT to save the Earth by utilizing its diverse lifeforms to terraform Earth, but instead to get a rare rock to turn a profit which necessitates destroying Pandora
>The scientists who are essentially good are still cowards allowing themselves to be used by private industry for imperial domination and genocide
>The efforts to teach the natives “Our language” is literally just to dominate them and steal their resources, all efforts of aid, diplomacy, and kindness is for this purpose
>The reality of imperial diplomacy is shown, you try being nice to steal land and resources and when the people say no you just kill them and steal it
>The destruction of Home Tree is a deliberate parallel to 9/11 to show that 9/11 happens all around the world everyday at the behest of the US military
>The humans are defeated because a diverse alliance of indigenous Navi peoples come together as a single army
>Pandora is essentially the Amazon rainforest, at least what we see of it
>In the sequels we’re meant to explore the different cultures of Pandora as a seeming refutation of noble savage stereotypes of all indigenous cultures being identical
>>1289314
Honestly I appreciate you calling out Yezus, people are acting like Ye shouldn’t be compared to Hitler, even my mom said that, but the thing is…Kanye is one of the wealthiest people in the world, was a billionaire prior to going mask off, openly worships Hitler, and is trying to become the elected leader of the US, I’d say the comparison is apt and the parallels are many
The only differences are that Hitler knew his dad (who beat the shit out of him), had siblings, was homeless, and was a shell-shocked veteran. Honestly pisses me off when people try making excuses for Ye about how his life was hard, nigha Hitler legit had a worse life and it still didn’t justify anything he did even BEFORE gaining power
>>1290216
You have no questions whatsoever when your first train of thought is to justify the act of murder in itself?
And it’s funny how you immediately shift to unarmed technical civilians you know people wouldn’t care about instead of, say, peasants that didn’t want to have soldiers come and steal their grain and conscript them, or objectively innocent people that were killed in an arguably pointless purge that ultimately didn’t actually make the USSR “stronger” for when Germany attacked or got rid of “reactionary subversives” considering how many citizens in occupied territories collaborated and turned over Jews for extermination anyway
The problem with people like you is that you pretty often take pleasure in killing itself, I know because I once clung to these general beliefs and saw others exactly like me express sadism and bloodlust frequently. Self-defense, which is what a mass democratic revolution would be, is not the same as killing innocent people, the former is justifiable violence, the latter is obviously unjustifiable, and I am disturbed by anyone that goes great lengths to defend the murder of innocents.
Unfortunately for you you do not actually own the anticapitalist, leftist, socialist, or communist labels, no matter how much you act like a Catholic inquisitor about it.
The actual suburbanite position, as people who are not actually exposed to violence, has frequently been to glamorize and glorify violence, priceless because they are not exposed to it. They talk a very big game, but only because they never really expect to get hurt. All violence taken twists the psyche of an individual, even violence taken in self-defense, I would gladly push away anyone that glorifies acts of violence and murder in themselves
>>1290773
But see, shit like this
>War is good actually
Is one of my many reasons to despise especially online tankies
I guess I just hate people who try to add virtue signaling to their sadistic desires? It’s so pretentious, just admit that thought of taking life makes you feel powerful which gives you pleasure, why all these layers of obfuscation? Is it because you actually just haven’t been exposed to real violence and only act like this because all this shit is really a game to you? Not desperate enough to actually be an insurgent but also aware and bitter you don’t have any real power? Willing to recognize our rulers are evil and willing to virtue signal about it but actually mostly indifferent to what happens to people other than yourself?
>>1290798
Literally everyone thinks their beliefs are rational. If you’re the same individual rambling about how war is good then no your viewpoint actually isn’t rational. And your answer proves the point of my “Christian” statement. Because the point is that, to a Christian, there is no goof reason not to adhere to their specific belief system. Not just their general religion either, but also their specific sect. See, for people like you, it isn’t enough that other people broadly oppose capitalism, they must also specifically obey you and your drive to enact one party states that are as willing to murder or jail someone for being an anarchist or slightly different variation of ML as they are to do it to ideologies that actually do uphold capitalism.
You really are like Catholic inquisitors in that way, it’s part of why “left unity” usually warps into “Don’t criticize MLs or countries they support. Ever. Ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever. And let them lead. Just obey MLs” . Notice how in your mind leftism doesn’t include people who aren’t USSR fans but does include people that would slaughter anarchists with impunity.
Again, I know it enrages the inquisitors, but you actually don’t own any label associated with socialism or communism outside the ones that apply to you, Marxist-Leninists and Stalinists. That’s it, that’s all USSR fanboys have actual ownership of. Those labels and things associated with them. Every other label precedes this cultish politics.
>>1290932
>What is (countries MLs worship)
I am not an ML
Do you people genuinely struggle to comprehend that there are communists that aren’t ML? Do you think we’re lying and are secretly evil? Is that why you’re down with making anarchists face the wall?
> Have you tried not being a fed?
Idk, have you?
Have you considered the internet tankie would be one of the greatest boons to the feds of almost anyone?
Look at your fucking so-called praxis
You demand people read several hundred paged tomes to even have a conversation with you
You conduct arguments by relying on intentional and conscious bias
You seemingly struggle to comprehend that people don’t agree with you or that you may actually be wrong (remember, you also call yourselves scientists despite this)
You regularly uphold what you essentially know entails the mass murder of innocent people but are cool with it because you seem to treat people outside of yourself as pawns to be sacrificed if it achieves what you count as a greater good
To an anarchist people like you are extremely similar to the liberals you claim to despise, you compare anarchists to liberals because anarchists value freedom, anarchists would compare you to liberals because you claim to fight for liberation but define it such a way where effectively you don’t
>>1290937
So would you say the Russian Civil War where 8 million people died, plague was rampant, rape and cannibalism were common place, and starvation decimated the population was actually a good war because as a consequence 20 years later Russia managed to industrialize, do welfare, and have literacy?(14 a,b,c,e,f repeat offender/chronic baiter)
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/u-s-stock-futures-point-to-fifth-day-of-losses-as-economic-growth-worries-linger-11670406503?mod=newsviewer_clickU.S. stocks waver in choppy trade, S&P 500 on pace for 5-day losing streak as economic growth worries linger>U.S. stock indexes are wavering between small gains and losses on Wall Street Wednesday, struggling to gain ground after a four-day losing streak amid worries about the chances of an economic downturn in coming months.>>How are stock-index futures tradingS&P 500 SPX, -0.16% dropped 14 points, or 0.3%, to 3,927
Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, 0.08% shed 70 points, or 0.2%, to 33,528, after rallying over 145 points earlier in the session
Nasdaq Composite COMP, -0.51% fell 83 points, or 0.8% to 10,931
On Tuesday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 351 points, or 1.03%, to 33596, the S&P 500 declined 58 points, or 1.44%, to 3,941, and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 225 points, or 2%, to 11,015.
><What’s driving markets>A four-day losing streak, during which the S&P 500 index has lost 3.4%, showed little sign of being snapped Wednesday as investors continued to assess the potential economic damage inflicted by high inflation and the Federal Reserve’s campaign to damp it by raising interest rates. U.S. stock indexes extended losses in midday trade despite regaining some ground in the morning session.>“The recent run of macro data points in the U.S. continues to underscore relatively solid economic trends. And combined with the recent easing in financial conditions, it may trigger a need for the Fed to push back in December. Put another way, the dove camp is feeling some pain,” said Stephen Innes, managing partner at SPI Asset Management.>>Jim Reid, strategist at Deutsche Bank , noted that the S&P 500 had now lost ground in the last seven out of eight sessions. “In fact, the latest moves for the S&P mean it’s now unwound the entirety of the rally following Fed Chair Powell’s [supposedly dovish] speech last week, which makes sense on one level given he didn’t actually say anything particularly new.”>>The S&P 500 has fallen 17.2% in 2022 as the Federal Reserve has driven borrowing costs sharply higher in an effort to tame inflation that has been running at the fastest pace in 40 years.>>The Fed’s monetary tightening alongside stubborn inflation may deliver a marked economic slowdown, senior bankers such as JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon and Goldman Sachs’s David Solomon warned this week.>>“Fears are growing that economies are in for a rough time ahead as feverish inflation and the bitter interest rate medicine being used to bring it down take effect,” said Susannah Streeter, senior investment and markets analyst, Hargreaves Lansdown.>>“Worries deepened amid warnings from U.S. banking and media sectors that navigating through the storm would not be easy, while the latest data has shown China’s trade has been sideswiped by a drop in global demand and zero-COVID policies. Despite today’s easing of restrictions it’s clear China’s COVID nightmare is not at an end,” Streeter added.>China on Wednesday announced a series of measures rolling back some of its most draconian anti-COVID-19 restrictions. People who test positive for the virus will be able to isolate at home rather than in overcrowded and unsanitary field hospitals, and schools where there have been no outbreaks must return to in-class teaching, according to the National Health Commission.>>The Hang Seng index HSI, -3.22% in Hong Kong fell 3.2%, while the CSI 300 000300, -0.25% dropped 0.2%, suggesting investors had already discounted Beijing’s more relaxed COVID stance. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/bnp-paribas-studied-100-years-of-market-crashes-heres-what-it-says-is-coming-next-11670412970?mod=newsviewer_clickBNP Paribas studied 100 years of market crashes — here’s what it says is coming next>Oops. Stocks fell through a key support on Tuesday and it looks like some recent momentum has now petered out. The new line in the sand for the S&P 500 SPX, -0.03% seems to be 3,900. Whether Santa eventually comes or not is still to be determined, with Mr. Claus perhaps postponing a decision until next Tuesday’s CPI release.>>But what’s clear is that the U.S. stock market is still in a bear market. And with that in mind, equity strategists at BNP Paribas mined 100 years of crashes to try to determine what’s next.>>Strategists led by Greg Boutle, head of U.S. equity and derivatives strategy, are expecting a capitulation event next year. “This would be a departure from the current bear market regime, which has been characterized by a grind lower in equities as P/E multiples have contracted,” they say.>>The most recent crash — the COVID-19 slump of March 2020 — is a bad template in their view, as it was driven both by the extreme nature of economic shutdowns and rapid monetary and fiscal responses. Nor do they expect 2008 to be the model, as they see U.S. GDP contracting about 1% next year, and earnings per share slipping 1.5%.>>However, 2002 is quite representative of recessionary crashes. That bear market was more than two years in length, with a drawdown of 50%, and a 29 percentage point peak-to-trough move in the VIX VIX, 1.89%. A typical recession bear market is 1.5 years in length, with a median drawdown of 38% and a median peak in the VIX of 40.5.>>“If we apply those averages to the market today, it implies a trough in the middle of next year, the S&P bottoming close to 3,000, and with the VIX in the low 40s,” they say.>>The bull market that ended last year was similar to that of the 1990s, with high retail participation, massive P/E multiple price expansion and many of the top performers unprofitable. The S&P 500 troughed in 2002 with a price-to-equity ratio of 14. BNP’s 2024 EPS forecast of $231 implies 3,250 for the S&P 500 if the P-to-E multiple falls to 14.>In a neat bit of analysis, BNP recreated the VIX VIX, 1.80%, which CBOE introduced in 1993, to cover the last 100 years. Usually, volatility peaks at or before the market trough.>>“We consider a capitulation as a move associated with a sense of panic that involves a rebasing of expectations, analysts aggressively cutting forecasts, volatility spiking and a repricing of tails. Over the last 100 years, the capitulations in volatility have on average come at the same time as the trough in the market,” they say.>>What they do like in such a market? One idea is to find companies that have maintained stock buybacks through a slowdown. Another is to look at companies with earnings momentum, though the only sector identified with positive momentum in a related chart is utilities XLU, -0.14%. Tech is still vulnerable, though what it calls prime tech could outperform more speculative and cyclical parts of the sector. >>1294825
>Still, I struggle to understand how democrats won after betraying Unions.
Because Herschel Walker was a comically shit candidate, probably meant by the GOP as an insult candidate who'd make their next candidate look better. He is unironically, no joke, diagnosed with multiple personality disorder. Raphael Warnock is maybe the most likable Democrat in the state, and so instead of attacking Warnock, the Walker campaign ran ads attacking trans people which played statewide (including in Atlanta, the gayest city in the entire south and also one of the largest) which may have backfired a bit. Even before Walker lost, GOP guys were positioning themselves to be the future "un-Walker" republican candidate, so I think that they're long gaming this.
Also, GOP hates unions even more openly than Dems lol. Most races where it's between the two don't have a pro-union candidate.
Вот и начали гомосеки
Разрастаться, как опухоль, в мире.
Скоро вспять обернутся реки,
И сожрут Солнце черные дыры.
Мир безумен? Он был прекрасен,
Пока мы не позволили этим,
Как помягче бы, пидорасам,
Триумфально идти по планете.
Что такое с людьми творится -
Пожинают гомики лавры.
Нас природа присыплет землицей,
Когда вымрем, как динозавры.
Кто-то скажет, что это нормально.
Ни хрена! Я отвечу прямо,
Потому что в родительской спальне
Быть должны папа и мама.
Деградация до амёбы,
Это ли уготовано людям.
Называйте меня гомофобом,
Бог не выдаст, Он всех рассудит.(Ты хуево пишешь по-русски.)
This guy is a dysgenic as fuck. I challenge you to watch a single video of this orcish freak without automatically wondering what bizarre genetic accident led him to be so fucking ugly. Seriously, look up Pierre Robin sequence, this guy has it.
He is the embodiment of the Amerimutt meme, he looks like someone asked an AI to create a living example of the dangers of uncontrolled racemixing and fetal alcohol syndrome. The funniest thing about this guy is that he acts like some kind of perfect specimen of humanity, while unironically sporting the receding chin, bald pate, goofy squeaking voice and cartoon ears of a bastard child born of incest.
That's not even the funniest thing though, because besides looking like a melted waxwork figure from an exhibition on the degenerate art of Weimar Germany, he is also just a fucking faggot. If there's a war on masculinity, this guy is the result, the crowning fucking achievement of that war. He preens constantly, everything he does is about his image, whether people are thinking about him, how many people are paying attention to him.
He is effectively a male version of Kim Kardashian. Seriously, watch his videos and look for anything resembling actual masculinity, not the cheap, tawdry drag-queen masculinity that he sells. Where are his children? Where is his wife? Where is his homestead? Where are the things he has created with his hands? Where are the lands has he has tamed?
His videos show how he actually spends his time, shopping, dancing in tight shirts, plucking his eyebrows, getting massages and hanging out with other men on the beach.
The only exception to these are the videos where he sticks a phallic symbol in his mouth and lisps angrily about how men aren't butch enough nowadays and how brotherly love is the greatest thing in earth. Pop a wig and a dress on the fag and he'd fit right in at your local library.
>socialists hate this
>a monopolist cabal, turns class struggle into race struggle, with this one simple trick
Can the fight for a more just world, where the weak and disadvantaged are not abandoned but helped, happen, without the understaning of the network of sub-control, influence and favors which ties together "the system" ?
Can a fight for justice happen, while being blind to the weapons used by the criminals, and their alliances which allow the criminals to hit by the side or also backstab who wants justice?
Can a gullible person, someone who lets themselves be swayed by empty words and promises, charged with only emotion and not meaning, can such a person ever manage to fight against (or just defend himself from) a thief who lies all the time?
Can a protest born on good premises and a goo assesment of the problem, but lacking awareness of the traps lying ahead on its route, amount to anything but to only get trapped once again by who it was rebelling against?
>>364>>360Can you fuck off with your 8chan era 'muh idpol stopped occupy'. No, violence and all the usual things ended Occupy you massive fucking retard.
It was dumb then it's still dumb now. Fuck off back to the past.
>>365>No, violence and all the usual things ended OccupyYou didn't answer yet, master retard on they payroll of a corporation.
Was occupy wall street a failure or not?
What does "the usual things" even mean? Can you put more than 3 words together to form a coherent sentence?
>>366>no you have to argue with meNo we have done this a million times.
Make better OP's.
>>372OWS was late of about 40 years anyway, shit started to roll on badly around 1970s, but at least there was an attempt with OWS
What has ever been done after OWS? Absolutely nothing.
OWS was actually the final tombstone on popular movements against big business, it's over, they control the universities where the "smartest" people are indoctrinated about how society supposely ""works"" making them into harmless hamsters powering the little wheels of the system, they control the mass medias where the "less smart" people are inoctrinated into mob thinking to follow the official narrative as it changes time by time accoring to economic or military opportunity. And the worst part is that most are blind to the social engeneering happening every day, as they are the main spectators, enablers, and supporters of the system which enslaves them.
Something that some of you may know is that, seemingly bizarrely, Francoist Spain had pretty good relations with the socialist government of Cuba. This becomes less bizarre when you realize that the Cuban revolution was a Hispanic revolution, that liberated Cuba from Anglosaxon subjugation.
Franco and his entire generation of military officers were fervently anti-American. The main reason was their military losses to Americans in Cuba and the Phillipines, that brought two Hispanic territories to the imperialist yoke of the United States. So when he and other Spaniards saw the Cuban revolutionaries fight and successfully defeat the Batista government, they saw a Hispanic people rising against an Anglo puppet government, liberating an outpost of Hispanic civilization from American imperialism, kicking out all the casino and plantation owners along their quisling partners. They saw this and recognized this massive victory of the Cuban people, creating this admiration that went beyond ideology.
This makes even more sense when you realize that so many Cubans are literally 100% Spanish. Ethnically identical, speak the same language with just difference in accents, culturally very similar, and obviously they are aware of their heritage. Iirc most Cubans today that aren't Afro-Cubans can trace their ancestry back to the Canary islands. You can see this immense connection between Cuba and Spain.
I'll end this giving you this song of the great Cuban singer Carlos Puebla dedicated to Spain.
>>385>Iirc most Cubans today that aren't Afro-CubanWell they were an important part of the revolution. Cuba in the 1950s practiced racial segregation and there's a reason why the really hard-right-wing Cuban exiles in Florida are pretty light skinned. There's a lot of anti-black racism in Florida as well.
>This makes even more sense when you realize that so many Cubans are literally 100% Spanish. I think Fidel said something once about how Cuba is a mix of different peoples which gave it a particular character, and how they inherited some good things from Spain like the fighting spirit and legal system and methods of organization, but also some negative things if we refer to colonialism and trying to dominate other people like the Spanish Empire did. So the Spanish blood was enriched by its intermixture with indigenous and African blood to create a distinct people and nation.
>>385Arguably a large reason the Cuban Revolution happened was because of the failed Spanish Revolution and the exiles of that revolution.
You can read books about all this.
>>394Unironically, socially conservative, fiscally leftist.
Populism is going to stick around for a while.
There's a theory of American presidential regime cycles in which there's a dominant party and the other party can get into power by basically agreeing to the hegemony of the larger one in terms of what's acceptable and what isn't. It's not a perfect science but it might point to cycles that occur. So the "dominant" party since Reagan has been the Republicans, so even the Democrats who have been in power (Clinton, Obama) were basically like Reaganite Republicans in reality. The historical period we're entering might be one in which the Democrats become the dominant party in the relationship and the Republicans are the subs for awhile.
>>399Social conservatism is a hard thing to define. Apparently a lot of churches in the U.S. had a problem with steep declines in attendence during the 1930s. I think a crisis might change people's behavior though but in contradictory ways, like right now we might have pro-LGBT people becoming "conservatives" in the sense of wanting order and stability while the "social conservatives" who support patriarchial values are stanning for Andrew Tate who is a decadent libertine which isn't conservative by any means.
>>409>Doesn't mean anything in America where socialism means welfare and taxing the rich. I'd care more about the younger generations being revolutionary than being "leftist"When the working and lower classes are tricked into reformism who is to blame:
A)The communist movement that didnt do enough to reach and propagandize its positions ,leading to people seeing the left wing of the bourgeoisie as the only option
B)The ignorance of the unwashed masses that cant see the wisdom of the eternal science of marxism leninism
Pick one
>>394Other people have called it on here but I'm going to repeat it: the right is going to start seriously appropriating things from the left (as they always do).
I used to be a TERF circa 2013-14. I see a lot of right-wingers using the exact same talking points RadFems used around that time to argue against transgender rights. Also, groups like PAAU Now use social justice rhetoric to argue for banning abortion (birth control too).
Not to mention you're seeing the economically-leftist-socially-conservative thing becoming a bigger and bigger trend. Basically, the right wants to use leftist economic policies like UBI, free healthcare, etc. in order to prop up social hierarchies like the patriarchal family. Expect the mainstream right to sound a lot more like Lyndon LaRouche and Caleb Muppet in the next few years.
I haven't had a chance to read into this too much as I am too busy but it looks like leftypol is not talking about it at all.
A new communist international was held with the following signatories
SIGNATURES:
Committees for the Foundation of the (Maoist) Communist Party of Austria (KG(m)KPÖ)[Austria]
Communist Party of Brazil (P.C.B.) [Brazil]
Red Fraction of the Communist Party of Chile (FRPCCh) [Chile]
Communist Party of Colombia (Red Fraction) (PCC(FR)) [Colombia]
Poder Proletário – M-L-M Party Organization Colombia (PP-OP-MLM) [Colombia]
Communist Party of Equator – Red Sun (PCE-SR) [Ecuador]
Maoist Committee in Finland (MKS) [Finland]
Maoist Communist Party (PCM) [French State]
Committee Red Flag (KRF) [Federal Republic of Germany]
Committee for the Reconstitution of the Communist Party of Mexico (CR-PCM) [Mexico]
Serve the People – Communist League of Norway [Norway]
Communist Party of Peru (PCP) [Peru]
Maoist Communist Party (PCM) [Spanish State]
Communist League of Sweden [Sweden]
Communist Party of Turkey/ Marxist-Leninist (TKP/ML) [Turkey]
https://ci-ic.org/blog/2022/12/26/historical-news-of-the-successful-holding-of-the-unified-maoist-international-conference-the-international-communist-league-was-founded/After the communist international the "International communist league" was founded I myself have no idea what a communist league means but I have seen photos of Finish Communists holding the new international communist league flags.
What does all of this mean?
>>1337307Not nazbols, we've just decided that Juche is compatible with our worldview and wish to work with North Korea against ZOG. Specifically in regards to how they view themselves, North Koreans consider themselves the "cleanest race" and have a highly patriotic and revolutionary culture.
https://www.docdroid.net/nv0n/the-cleanest-race-pdf>>1337839NJP is a Kremlin propaganda outlet, they're self-admitted strasserites/Nazbols. Patriot Front are paleocons, they may have some fascist tendencies but it's incoherent because they're trying to appeal more towards Americanism and America was founded on antifascist principles.
No matter what any of you say Nazism is a form of socialism, it just breaks convention from your brand of it and the closest living thing resembling National Socialism is Juche. When applied to America, Nazism takes on a more anarchistic form as destruction of all existing social orders and hierarchies as well as cultures are necessary for our goals.
Nazism isn't incoherent, it's just counter-revolutionary retards like in the NJP and Patriot Front that try to synthesize elements of fascism with americanism and antifascist ideas, mainly because they're uneducated retards that miss the point. Unfortunately they're the loudest crowd.
For one thing, iirc the standard "Biblically accurate angels" are actually just 4 specific entities. They're supposed to be divine, but they aren't the only thing angels are supposed to look like.
Also, they actually are pretty beautiful. You have to understand that if you take these as literal divine visions (which you shouldn't necessarily, a lot of this stuff is symbolic, but still…) then the significance of these incomprehensibly massive, totally symmetrical beings has a kind of unearthly majesty. Someone who was in such a state that they'd see these things bathed in light like this would be intimidated, but also filled with sublime awe.
Imo God specifically is better understood as a representation of something ever-present and pouring through-and-beyond the human domain, a river which runs far beyond our contrivances and also sparks those contrivances into being. If you think of God as a literal big jealous man, it is easy for this man to be far away. He can intervene now and then if you take only literal interpretations into account, and don't read too heavy into the metaphor. On the other hand, if God is the air you breathe, the energy which runs through you, the matter from which everything is made, destroyed, remade again… if God is what is common to all that lives and all that lies dead, if God is a representation of all action and thought and history and pre-history and post-history… then God is not far away. Although God runs through all of us, though, God can never be you or I; God cannot be one of us only because God is all of us. This is why, from my understanding, Satan can be considered Lord of this World - because we are all compelled by our innate programming to reject God, not in the sense of rejecting Abrahamic faith (which tbh is unnecessary, but useful for this analogy), but in the sense of rejecting one another.
>>549the transhumanist test is unironically the greatest filter for educated westoid commies
why are they like this?
>>552because transgender people are literally larping as female stereotypes so it's an easy target like furries, obviously out there people
I'd never bother them or try to make them kill themselves and shit but it just seems like a mistake to me to live that way and destroy your hormones because you're unhappy with your body
extremely funny that you've managed to bolster scottish independence though, I'm coming around slowly I think
>>554 (me)
specifically nazis think this is an assault on WOMBS or something, tricking guys into being gay for female presenting assholes and sterilizing women to give them beards. of course it's the (((globalists))) doing a heckin malthusianism or whatever
terfs or whatever british people, jk rowling types, seem to be concerned about the butch women getting vacuumed up by the transmasc community and transfems trying to get into bathrooms and rape women, sounds delusional
what freudian urge does it come from?
idk people can have an irrational disgust response and build delusions off it?
>>560I mean I'd
expect it to be himself. If it was somebody else saying he said it that would be weird, wouldn't it?
This still isn't much. He wrote this in 2006 and this bit of text is a retrospective description of his previous passive opinions at the start of the war - which is to say that the first opinion he ever seems have bothered voicing was
opposed to the war and to the Bush administration, since this book was devoted to attacking those policies and in 2006 the war was still ongoing. Even his blog from a year before this book was already opposed.
>>561>I mean I'd expect it to be himself.Well, yeah, then why did you ask?
I already pointed out that he didn't have a platform yet in the post you responded to.
>>563I have talked to loads and loads trans people, I have fbi.gov (lol) and can go on the internet like anyone else, they talk about themselves 24/7. One of my best friends from childhood is a transfem lesbian in a committed relationship to a cis woman and they claim I matchmade them, no joke (not true but cute to say that). After listening to it for years and assuming it was completely legit on its face I'm not convinced it's anything more than overreaction to sexual fantasies of being the opposite gender, depression, and body dysmorphia.
I 100% buy that anti-universal healthcare people are trying to sabotage trans right movements, and that's evil shit.
The trans movement could lead to better human rights for everyone, I'm just saying I feel bad for them.
I don't thinks it's globohomo and I was replying to someone asking why right wingers hate transgender people.
I realize my opinion on trans people is irrelevant outside this specific context of explaining the difference between my raw, elemental transphobia and the retardation of your average chinletjak or Harry Potter fan.
I would never bring it up because I'm not gonna make someone feel worse, and hey, I may be wrong. Just doesn't look like a happy life to me.
>>562>Well, yeah, then why did you ask?To see what the source was.
Also the first post about it itt was saying it was how he "entered the mainstream," which is just… flatly false. Even saying he didn't have a platform yet is kinda overstating it - like "not having a platform" can be saying something very loudly but having nobody listen to you. This sounds like Greenwald never even bothered to voice his passive acceptance of the Iraq War except as a retrospective tidbit in an anti-Bush text. Like there's not having a platform and then there's just not bothering to say something at all.
>>564Also true!
>>565Obviously.
>>568>the first post about it itt was saying Not me, I was correcting him.
>Even saying he didn't have a platform yet is kinda overstating itHe said he didn't have a platform…
I'm literally quoting him.
>>574Maybe I'm getting the wrong impression from my trans friends raising hell about how we need to get people on the drugs early so they can have lifelong body changes, or memeing about how Syngenta pesticides fucking up frog uteruses is fine because LMAO ALEX JONES GAY FROGS EVERYONE BECOMES TRANS, and talking about how every vaguely "masculine" woman or "feminine" man would be good at being trans, like they are just constantly obsessing over physiognomy in a way that seems super unhealthy to me? Probably not universal.
Again I am not gonna go spreading my nonsense, just letting my brain be picked here, and sorry for derailing.
>>566>I'm not convinced it's anything more than overreaction to sexual fantasies of being the opposite gender, depression, and body dysmorphia.well i, a lifelong troomer, can tell you that this is not what it means
are we too mentally ill for you to just take our word for it? can you see inside our heads?
>>577It's medication. You're being pretty pedantic. Yea I have been told that before, like I just said.
>>578No but I do listen to your descriptions of gender dysphoria and based on my (mis)understanding of it, it is like suicidal depression caused by body dysmorphia. I don't think it's "hedonic degenerancy" or whatever Warhammer 40k type jargon rightoids come up with, I think that getting psychiatric treatment and community support is helpful to people with depression and this is just substituting SSRIs for another medication so it's no surprise gender affirmation saves lives
>>580>based on my (mis)understanding of itso close yet so far
>muh dysmorphiadysmorphia is explicitly about seeing your body in a warped way, trans people see their body objectively but they hate it for some reason
>>549>>552>>559oh so the reason siberia hates glenn is because he doesn't like trains?
how mild, how boring.
>>586>So what's your problem with trans people taking hrt as early as possible to go through the puberty of their preferred gender?that their dicks don't grow big enough to actually be turned into a neo-vagina
source: jazz Jennings
>>587Fuck off Glenn I'm growing and learning in here.
>>585People often genuinely believe that transphobes are eggs, this is widespread.
>>583There are very minor differences.
>>586Because psychiatric healthcare has repeatedly made tremendous mistakes? And now people are gonna go around telling elementary schoolers they're looking eggy, making then feel like shit about their bodies and transition as a meme?
>>576This is ridiculous obsession on your part. Consider taking the same magnifying glass to cis het ppl. You see the same obsession with masculinity, femininity, who makes a good man and woman, who would be a good lay, who should have kids with whom, and they have their own hormone therapeutics for aging/lacking femininity and masculinity at all ages, even deranged shit like casually advocating corrective rape on lgbt ppl. There's no question, all people see the world from a narrow view except perhaps when engaging in the wider social process of science. In our lives we have to measure everything by our own experiences. It's a mark of maturity when people are able to chill out and see from others' point of view, but that comes from experience, of having seen many other people's lives. Some ppl never even make it there. As far as harm, hetties do way more of that and have a long history to cite from as well.
I do agree that trans ppl tend to be weird. There's many not terminally online tho also, who are actually just mostly well adjusted. Terminally online trans ppl are as brainwormed and echochambered as other terminally online people… shocker.
>>598Reactionaries always see minority groups as a spectacle to be analyzed and dissected. The extent of reactionary fascism determines the extent of dissection. This is why
>>552 is so accurate.
>>600 (me)
btw did I say anything about being gay? no. because i am fucking gay.
>>573>sex between two adults over the age of consent is fineYes. Obviously.
>>572I posted why you're demonstrably wrong earlier, but apparently the jannies deleted you… then deleted me. Then you reposted… I have no fucking idea what's going on in this thread tbqh.
I'm not going to look up world ages of consent again, but there are like
maybe 5 countries in the entire world that set it over 20. In Afghanistan it's fucking
puberty if married. You have no clue what you're talking about, like at all.
(Thread merge END. Some posts are out of order. Moved b4 thread merge) bunch of armchair ziggers
when was the last time a tankie went out to fight? to actually bash the fash as it were?
anarchists did it in numbers in syria and iraq while you shitposted online. you are now still shitposting online during Ukraine.
you just jerk yourselves of to the most authoritarian, imperialistic, capitalist regimes and have never once engaged in praxis.
you are pure enemies to the workers and communism. LARPers. i wouldn't be surprised if you're all actually unironic fascists who just made this site as a joke.
authcoms will never do anything ever again other than sit at home talking about how fascist regimes are actually good and beneficial to the cause
go and squat a building being held ransom by the state or landlords, give aid to political prisoners, protest rightists, help people on strike. you never ever will.
all though lets be honest, what else do you expect from someone who's entire logic /ideal is that we need to reach a STATELESS, CLASSLESS, MONEYLESS society, by…. get, this, - creating an authoritarian dictatorship that maximises state control, kills its own people, and still relies on money!
>>689>imperialism is when geopolitics existsPlease read Lenin
>>688And? What exactly do worthless techno treats prove? Rome invented gladiator games, guess that means they’re invincible according to your logic
Unique IPs: 219