jucika thread pls
>>1036FYI you got a booru for this
Jucika.booru.org
>>7730>sageWhy?!
>>7669>>7687Hello Paheal
>>10140Its so transparently awful it breaks suspension of disbelief, Jucika is supposed to be slightly risque but still grounded, like cheeky moments from everyday life not whatever the fuck that was
Like I could imagine someone doing/being in these situations
>>10125>>1040>>1037But no sane human being would ever do that
>>10153>>10127>>10125>>10124this is your brain on america
>>1037>>1040This is your brain on the right side of the cold wae
>>13433this, yeah i can see why.
>>19337ur gay
>>19639>here are some pretty funny or smart onesNot really, The og comics were just cute and raunchy comics with nudes but with the newer nsfw one there just the same shit sex jokes and turns it into basic porn you can get anywhere else, that (6/10 of the time in twitter) was made by someone who jerks or makes underage porn.
>Draw something better thenCommission or get an another artist that isn't shit and suspicious
>Don't be a prude.Said nothing about boobs
>>19648>The og comics were just cute and raunchy comics <same shit sex jokes Have you seen the original Jucika? LOL
>Commission or get an another artist that isn't shit and suspicious>Comission<implying I'm going to spend money on a comic parody Kek
>Said nothing about boobsThen what is your problem with
>>19634 it's not as blatant or low effort as
>>10153 or
>>10127 and it's exactly in the same humor type as the original Jucika. Like I said, most of Aldo's stuff isn't for me, but they do draw Jucika well and a few of their comics are actually funny.
>>19649>Have you seen the original Jucika? LOL >lolyes with nudes
>implying I'm going who said anything about you
>Then what is your problem with >>19634albo is gay :^)
>their comics are actually funny.nah
>it's not as blatant or low effortthat just there art style, you don't have to throw other artist under the bus to succ
x artist's cock
>>19651>who said anything about you Given that your reply is to me, I assumed you told me to do so. Feel free to pay for commissions yourself.
>Albo is gay Yes I know he's fag, doesn't really have much bearing on the content he makes. If the comics pushed some kind of homo liberalism, sure, fuck that, but it doesn't.
>don't have to throw other artist under the bus to succ x artist's cock The hell are you talking about? I don't give a fuck about Aldo, they're just the most prolific Jucika parodist and do the drawings quite similar to the original art.
>>19654>Feel free to pay for commissions yourself. again, was not talking about you. you just circled back into of my points
Anyone can just Commission or get an another artist that isn't shit and suspicious
>Yes I know he's fag>pushed some kind of homo liberalismnow you're just making shit up :^)
>I don't give a fuck about Aldo>they're just the most prolific Jucika parodistnah
the albo is doodoo :^)
>>20185cute
I should watch his streams one day to know his process
>>28894who made the original and who is doing the new ones
but yeah incidentally sexiness is like 10000% hot
something about randomness is like ecstasy to the mind
>>28913>but yeah incidentally sexiness is like 10000% hotBecause if it's not random then it's patronizing. It's easy to
try to be hot.
>>28974Yes
She was trained as a sleeper agent to subvert capitalist incel opposition members into communists via baiting them to date her (secretly subjected them to theory)
>>28894>No amount of explicit nudity makes the new comics live up to the old ones. True
>muh male gazeLame ass lib nonsense.
>In the original the naughtiness is incidental to the character doing what she wants, for herself. The guy that created Jucika was horny as fuck, Jucika was a published caricature strip however, so that means that nudity and sexuality were toned down to go through censors.
I agree that not all of the new ones are tasteful, but there's been a few good ones, and the style is very similar, which is harder to replicate than people think.
Unique IPs: 38