/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

Yeah that french pedo foucalt talked about this. Creation of perfect citizen or something

You're lost. This isn't your blog.

Ok what's your solution then?

>>2247031
I mean it strikes me that a lot of talk about so-called nanny state "socialism" is really more about the liberal welfare state. The same goes for ideas of authoritarianism and totalitarianism projected onto AES. Ideas about so-called left-wing authoritarianism, inverted totalitarianism and so on don't work well for describing communists but work much better for describing welfarists.

>>2247104
Anyhow I think that social sector professionals should be lined up against the wall and shot. Fuck nurses, fuck wellness checks and fuck the nonprofit industrial complex. It's nothing less than professionalised gaslighting and abuse. The whole sector is just kind of rapey TBH.

>>2247117
>Fuck nurses
agreed I mean have you seen how fat the general population has gotten? nurses are legitimately one of the only professions left where the women are still skinny and/or hot because they're walking around all day doing medical checkups.

>>2247118
Not the context eugenicist. I'm more speaking about means-testing and the welfare system as a form of institutionalization. Shit like mass diagnosis and putting autists in special ed. Eric Fromm's biophilia and necrophobia as a whole. Anyhow I'm speaking from the POV of service users. The welfare state abuses queers and abuses disabled people.

>>2247118
>welfare is liberal claptrap that props up leeches at the expense of the working class
so true bestie let's start liquidating the retired pensioners and grandmas and grandpas just like the NSDAP of old, since they can no longer contribute to the workforce

>>2247028
Yeah except in practice fascoids always side with liberal porkies over socdems when it comes to helping the poor and needy.

>>2247203
And? Socialism has 100% employment unlike capitalism.

>>2247206
>socialism forces you to be a wagecuck
yes, i know

>No! I want to be a lazy piece of shit, and capitalism enables me! I don't want society to improve for workers!
We know.

>>2247207
ok sure w/e let's still do socialism then. capitalism also forces you to be a wagecuck unless you are some kind of leech so this shouldn't be an issue to you then, at worst its the same thing by your own admission. So yeah sure buddy, w/e you say

>>2247207
>wage
>socialism
You clearly dont know.

>>2247222
yes, i am a lazy leech, so leave me be.
only wagies get in cagies.
>>2247230
>it will actually work this time. i promise, guys!(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

>>2247233
>yes, i am a lazy leech, so leave me be.
</pol/ posts appear everywhere
Maybe you should fuck off?

>>2247246
i will snuggle back under my warm blanket as you get back in the wage cage. to each his own!

>>2247120
I've seen plenty of fat nurses

>>2247233
>The “dangerous class”, [lumpenproletariat] the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of the old society, may, here and there, be swept into the movement by a proletarian revolution; its conditions of life, however, prepare it far more for the part of a bribed tool of reactionary intrigue.
Marx really cooked with this one

>>2247117
Oh so your are just edgy. Just preface everything with that so I can ignore it.

>>2277478
me when I'm a fucking retard who doesn't know what words mean

>>2277478
Marx is easily one of the top 10 individuals in history in terms of the sheer amount of productive intellectual work that he did.

What if instead of that we militarize society?
A soldier on each son you have

Military service is abolished because every school every community and every institution becomes a military complex
kinda like the Ba'athist guilds

While some people might be against it and they should at first
i believe it's ultimately the only way to uphold an "equal" society
this would imply to rethink the concept of a "soldier" to not be alienated from society altogether
a soldier doesn't mean you should be a combatant, ideally everyone would be trained to perform in combat if needed but that would be in such extreme case that our front lines of career combatants can't cover their position at the time being.

>>2315146
I’ll raise you one, conscription for basic public service and everyone rotating jobs every six months for at least two years. If at the end of two years you wanna go out and find your own permanent job you can and if you’re not functional outside a barracks environment you can just stay conscripted, for the rest of your life if you wanted to.

>>2315499

deal, but conscription just means you have to help in kitchens and shit that teaches you basic life skills / find a career in a logistics body military branch
active combatants should still be *mostly* voluntary.

you'd still have to join the drills and training courses as well as do exercise with active duty conscripts and enlisted

that'd be the best course of action as well as to redefine soldiers as part of society rather than a separate power alienated from the public and vice versa

as much as i like numbers go up it helps nobody if a soldier doesn't wanna be operating outside of emergencies and such scenarios where it's more of a self preservation situation

it's more likely to go AWOL / trivialize the hold