We must proletarianize the fascist petty-bourgeoisie and accelerate the revolution. We must boycott small businesses and small landlords. The petty-bourgeoisie are far too bought into the system to resist and appealing to them is misguided.
>>2257541>We must proletariat the fash petty bourgeois So ACP
>Boycott small business and landlordsSo not ACP
Also small business and landlords IS petty bourgeois. You're probably thinking of lumpen bourgeois aka grifters and onlyfans
>>2258092>If you don't employ other people then you're not small business you're just a worker.Interesting definition you have there. I've never seen that.
Aifk there's "self-employed" that do belong to marginalized part of the petty-bourgeois as long as they actually work their own equipment and can set their own prices.
Yes they're exploited, often more exploited than the average employed worker but alone doesn't mean they're proletarian.
Ofc the "setting their own prices" thing can go into a gray area. Some of them have one large corporate client, and do other stuff in the mean time. There it's not as clear cut and they're in-between classes.
>>2257579>>2257582>ends up creating technofeudalism insteadthis is my greatest fear anons
>>2269310it will just create technofeudalism. I hope anons enjoy being in the nick land goo chamber
>>2269401Techno-feudalism is just a fancy buzzword word for state-monopoly capitalism. Read Lenin's "Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism."
Anyhow firebombing the petty-bourgeoisie can't be any worse than the current system.
>>2270755It's a skilled artwork.
>>2270900Prove it.
>>2271384Please explain how directly consooming from megacorporations will not simply direct more capital and consolidated power to said megacorporations. Also say "unionize" what the fuck do you mean by "proletarian association"? It is a widely observed fact that it's easier to unionize in small businesses in comparison to corporations due to how easier you're capable of organizing with the reduced corporate bureaucracy and workforce.
Leftists do literally anything but organize and inform these days
>>2271437The so-called technofeudalism does not exist, because what exists is only financial capital dominating the economy in financialization, an inevitable consequence of capitalism with the decrease in profit rates. Feudalism only has rents that the serfs gave to the feudal lord of the land they harvested, unlike the proletariat who sells their labor force to the capitalist. This discourse is anti-Marxist because all intellectual production belongs to society and does not belong to anyone, even if other capitalists collect this information. Intellectual property should be abolished in the scientific socialist movement without exception. In addition, those who speak of technofeudalism are only co-opting the workers to conciliate with the bourgeoisie, wanting to reform the European Union and not nationalize all banks and suppress private banks with a state-owned national bank without neoclassical economists, Keynesians, followers of MMT, and administrators of financial capital. Instead, the national bank with its own currency will not be independent and will be coordinated by a popular council with mandatory participation of the working class to be used as a weapon against capitalists and prevent inflation from affecting workers' wages, prioritizing bankruptcy, occupation, nationalization of the private property of all capitalists to intensify the class struggle and the collapse of the capitalist state in order to be able to implement the dictatorship of the proletariat when the proletariat will be able to acquire its political supremacy.
Unique IPs: 41