[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


File: 1747533556045.png (294.45 KB, 576x566, blur.png)

 

small business owners usually fall into two categories: people who were so good at their job that they wanted to uncap their earnings and capture all the upside so they became consultants essentially, and on the other hand, people who are so obnoxious that being their own boss is the only way they could stay gainfully employed. If you've ever had the displeasure of being of being employed by the latter you'll know they can be infinitely more cruel, anal, dimwitted, and petty than any corporate executive or HR manager. The kind who pay minimum wage, as few or no benefits they can get away with, and scream at employees.

The petit booj ran a business with no buffer, no adaptability, and treated people like garbage, now they want my sympathy because they bet wrong on cheap imports?

A huge part of the emotional charge behind these complaints, especially among small business owners or freelancers, is the existential fear of re-proletarianization. They've tasted a degree of autonomy (however shaky), and the idea of going back to W-2 life, answering to a boss, or clocking in under surveillance again feels like death of the self.

They've constructed identities around being the boss, even if they're just scraping by. Going back to a "real job" means surrendering control over their time, work environment, and self-image. Many of them bought into the bootstraps ideology. Losing the business, or just watching it stagnate, feels like personal moral failure, not just market fluctuation. It’s not just about money. It's about status. Going from "entrepreneur" to "employee" (even if it's in a cushy corporate gig) feels like falling a class rung back into the worker pool. Many use their business as a narrative shield: "I'm not stuck in the system, I'm building something." The collapse of that dream isn't just stressful, it's identity-threatening.

That’s the real fear underneath the performative outrage, the entitlement, and sometimes the cruelty. They’re clinging to their mini-kingdoms (some justified, many not) because the alternative isn’t just economic loss. It’s class displacement. Its fear of them being turned into just another schmuck clocking in at 9 and slaving away under stark fluorescent lights.

FACE IT - COMPLAINING ABOUT TARIFFS IS THE TREATLERISM OF THE PETIT BOURGEOIS.

>>2273041
>COMPLAINING ABOUT TARIFFS IS THE TREATLERISM OF THE PETIT BOURGEOIS
Treatlerism is the treatlerism of the petit bourgeois

File: 1747545894885.png (120.32 KB, 537x538, marxism leninism.png)

>>2273041
Here is a simple illustration. Let us take a shoemaker who owned a tiny workshop, but who, unable to withstand the competition of the big manufacturers, closed his workshop and took a job, say, at Adelkhanov’s shoe factory in Tiflis. He went to work at Adelkhanov’s factory not with the view to becoming a permanent wage-worker, but with the object of saving up some money, of accumulating a little capital to enable him to reopen his workshop. As you see, the position of this shoemaker is already proletarian, but his consciousness is still non-proletarian, it is thoroughly petty-bourgeois. In other words, this shoemaker has already lost his petty-bourgeois position, it has gone, but his petty-bourgeois consciousness has not yet gone, it has lagged behind his actual position.

Clearly, here too, in social life, first the external conditions change, first the conditions of men change and then their consciousness changes accordingly.

But let us return to our shoemaker. As we already know, he intends to save up some money and then reopen his workshop. This proletarianized shoemaker goes on working, but finds that it is a very difficult matter to save money, because what he earns barely suffices to maintain an existence. Moreover, he realizes that the opening of a private workshop is after all not so alluring: the rent he will have to pay for the premises, the caprices of customers, shortage of money, the competition of the big manufacturers and similar worries — such are the many troubles that torment the private workshop owner. On the other hand, the proletarian is relatively freer from such cares; he is not troubled by customers, or by having to pay rent for premises. He goes to the factory every morning, calmly goes home in the evening, and as calmly pockets his pay on Saturdays. Here, for the first time, the wings of our shoemaker’s petty-bourgeois dreams are clipped; here for the first time proletarian strivings awaken in his soul.

Time passes and our shoemaker sees that he has not enough money to satisfy his most essential needs, that what he needs very badly is a rise in wages. At the same time, he hears his fellow-workers talking about unions and strikes. Here our shoemaker realizes that in order to improve his conditions he must fight the masters and not open a workshop of his own. He joins the union, enters the strike movement, and soon becomes imbued with socialist ideas…

https://redsails.org/stalins-shoemaker/

>>2273302
>quotes the archangel of petit booj

>>2273305
infantile

File: 1747547488986.png (35.54 KB, 1600x1141, stalin quote shoemaker.png)

>>2273302
the shoemaker parable from Stalin is so perfect because it presents you with two options: RADICALIZE, RE-EDUCATE, AND REGIMENT THE DOWNWARDLY MOBILE EX-PETTY BOURGEOISIE AS THEY FALL INTO PROLETARIAN RANKS OR WATCH HELPLESSLY AS THEY FORM THE BASIS OF A REACTIONARY MOVEMENT TO RESTORE LOST CLASS PRIVILEGES

IF THERE IS DOWNWARD CROSS-CLASS MOBILITY FROM THE PETTY BOURGEOISIE INTO THE PROLETARIAT, THEN THERE WILL BE A CORRESPONDING DOWNWARD MOBILITY FROM THE PROLETARIAT INTO THE "LUMPEN", I.E. THE HOMELESS, CRIMINAL, DECLASSED, IMPRISONED, ETC.

IF THE RANKS OF THE PROLETARIAT ARE BEING EMPTIED OUT OF THE "OLD" PROLETARIAT WHO ARE DYING FROM POVERTY WHILE THE "NEW" PROLETARIAT ARE FORMER PETTY BOURGEOISIE WHO HAVE LOST THEIR STATUS, THEN IT IS ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL TO RE-EDUCATE THE "NEW" PROLETARIAT BEFORE THEY BECOME THE BASIS OF A FASCIST MOVEMENT.

THIS IS SO ESSENTIAL IN THE UNITED STATES RIGHT NOW THAT I CANNOT OVERSTATE IT!

the entire american working class is lumpen. theres no hope for america

>>2273302
>>2273325
>educating = catering
of course its a stalinist

>>2273390
>7 word derail reply
nice try FBI

>>2273415
>fed is when you are NOT a class collaborationist opportunist
okaaaay

>>2273325
>IF THERE IS DOWNWARD CROSS-CLASS MOBILITY FROM THE PETTY BOURGEOISIE INTO THE PROLETARIAT, THEN THERE WILL BE A CORRESPONDING DOWNWARD MOBILITY FROM THE PROLETARIAT INTO THE "LUMPEN", I.E. THE HOMELESS, CRIMINAL, DECLASSED, IMPRISONED, ETC.
yes sir proles should worry about the economy and vote!!

>>2273325
downwardly mobile is not the same as literally re-proletarianized (yet)

>>2273325
>IF THERE IS DOWNWARD CROSS-CLASS MOBILITY FROM THE PETTY BOURGEOISIE INTO THE PROLETARIAT, THEN THERE WILL BE A CORRESPONDING DOWNWARD MOBILITY FROM THE PROLETARIAT INTO THE "LUMPEN", I.E. THE HOMELESS, CRIMINAL, DECLASSED, IMPRISONED, ETC.

yeah and thats already habbening

>>2273302
>On the other hand, the proletarian is relatively freer from such cares; he is not troubled by customers, or by having to pay rent for premises. He goes to the factory every morning, calmly goes home in the evening, and as calmly pockets his pay on Saturdays. Here, for the first time, the wings of our shoemaker’s petty-bourgeois dreams are clipped; here for the first time proletarian strivings awaken in his soul.
Honestly a point on why it can be hard to rouse the proletariat and why having some amount of petit bourgie daily anxiety in the party is useful, but we need to reach into the proletariat to unleash the extremely high levels of people power needed.

>>2273389
bullshit

>>2273322
Yeah but this was before Stalin's deviation so I'll allow it

>>2273423
>when you are NOT a class collaborationist opportunist

What's wrong with being a class collaborationist opportunist? I thought we're all here because we failed to become collaborators.


Unique IPs: 11

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]