>>2284649I have to come back to expand this conversation, in particular because you are throwing rather ridiculous claims.
>government rather than internal party channelsParra, the current leader of the PCV explained they depleted the internal party channels, that they won't allow the party to be co-opted by a leadership that pretends it's good idea to divide votes, when it's necessary to give 0 inches to any opposition politician.
you know what the x.com pcv never did? address EACH POINT BY POINT, WITH PROOF PROVING PARRA WRONG, specially when Parra stated that the subversive leadership of the x.com pcv ignored the procedures of the leadership election
I can bring Parra's words and reasoning.
>Parra indicated that they filed an appeal with the Constitutional Court because they believe the current leadership of the PCV is illegitimate and illegal, having been elected at a Congress in which "more than 80% of the party's membership did not participate."I HAVE NEVER SEEN the x.com pcv stating their internal rules, the acts of the electoral procedures Parra claimed were viciously violated,
NEVER, pure deflection and hiding behind wall of texts. Is that dialectical materialism? is it all that with pseudo-Marxism talk communism? is that revolutionary?
go on, ask the x.com pcv proofs proving wrong Parra, ask the solidnet evidence of the same. Ask indefenseofcommunism too, evidence showing how
le evil government took over the PCV. no? no evidence? no solid evidence?
excuse you, but fuck you, fuck solidnet, fuck indefenseofcommunism, and fuck all of those paleolithic creatures unwilling to wake up to undeniable evidence that the x.com pcv has no legitimacy, no moral ground, and no reason or whatsoever to be used in a socialist or communistic debate about what my country is, does or wants to achieve.
>And I don't care about Marquez no one in the PCV or Popular Revolutionary Alternative said the guy was a communist so i don't understand the point in bringing him up. because people like (You) is giving some face of value what the x.com pcv has to say or do. are you mad that I brought him up? get real, their decision needs to face the wall, and assume their consequences, including those who get mad about that.
>I'm not gunna defend every tactical choice the PCV makes.<tacticalFUCKING TACTICALtactical was to split always from Chavez, tactical was never go and train people about communism and socialism, because they had that option, the PSUV has never been and it isn't an teaching party, it has been and it is a mobilization party, thus the x.com pcv could've gone a train, agitprop, debate and contribute with more revolutionary training. I HAVE NEVER SEEN ONE X.COM PCV MEMBER NEAR A PRIVATE COMPANY RECRUITING WORKERS.
NEVER. They are armchair lords.
this wasn't tactical, this was subversive, and god I wish Maduro was the horror person the liberals and anti-communists accuse him of being, to see all those people hanging on with a literal anti-communist like enrique marquez with a inverse neck-tie made up of rope choking off a bridge.