The Chinese are not dedicated Marxists, but they are using Marxist lens when approaching their economy.
When their country reaches a sufficient level of development, they will throw Marxism out of the window completely and become a liberal democracy.
Don't you agree? Marxism is just a tool for them.
>>2284607Wrong. The system of exploitation of man by man has been abolished in Communist China.
>>2284428Wrong. Mao and Deng was perhaps the most dialectical marxists.
>>2284358>they will throw Marxism out of the window completely and become a liberal democracy.Yes, yes, and the economy will collapse and we'll repeat the end of history, blah blah blah.
Don't any of you all get tired of spouting the same amount of Fukuyamist bogus?
>>2285031>when did this trend start?about 1977 or so, not to say that the pre-77 state of things was much better but it was more or less a worse version of the soviet system applied to china
>is it increasing or decreasing or has it been at a constant level?it depends, in the 80s it increasing at a slow but steady level, from the 90s until the early 2010s it accelerated, and from then until about 2020 it receded, then is starting to steadily grow again
>>2284358>When their country reaches a sufficient level of developmentThey have far exceeded the level of development nessessary for a liberal democracy
>they will throw Marxism out of the window completely and become a liberal democracy.They have far exceeded the level of development that a liberal democracy could feasably function under.
>Marxism is just a tool for them.Marxism is a tool in the way a keyboard is just a tool, you never stop using one, you only expand and improve upon it.
Unique IPs: 24