Why the fuck are zionists so cartoonishly unhinged? Like, you kind of have to sit back to acknowledge how easily their behaviour would fit into an actual children’s cartoon given how easy it is for literally any mf to consider them to be objectively evil. They cannot be stupid right?
>>2328229My impression is they're more "Nietzschean" than anything. I don't know if Friedrich Nietzsche the philosopher would agree. Or maybe Machiavellian. I'm bad at explaining this, but it's like, "it's better to be feared than loved." There's a noticeable lack of pity or remorse.
If they sense weakness, complacency, or false bravado then that is signaling an invitation for them to exploit that and go for the jugular. I would not put it past them to attempt to kill Khamenei. They are also good at misdirection and will lie without a second thought if they think it gives them an advantage or will lull you into a state which will give them the element of surprise. Also, as a warning for the antisemites, that kind of talk does not come across to them as a sign of strength or intimidating capability.
Zionism and Nazism are two weeds that grew out of the same bed.
https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/document/mideast/agedict/ch02.htm
>The German university graduates, who took over the Zionist movement after Herzl’s death, developed the modernist-racist ideology of Jewish separatism. They had been powerfully influenced by their pan-Germanic fellow students of the Wandervögel (wandering birds or free spirits) who dominated the German campuses before 1914. These chauvinists rejected the Jews as not being of Germanic Blut; therefore they could never be part of the German Volk and were thoroughly alien to the Teutonic Boden or soil. All Jewish students were compelled to grapple with these concepts which surrounded them. A few moved left and joined the Social Democrats. To them this was just more bourgeois nationalism and was to be fought as such. Most remained conventionally Kaiser-treu, stout nationalists who insisted that a thousand years on the German Boden had made them into “Germans of the Mosaic persuasion”. But a portion of the Jewish students adopted the wandervogel ideology whole and simply translated it into Zionist terminology. They agreed with the anti-Semites on several key points: the Jews were not part of the German Volk and, of course, Jews and Germans should not mix sexually, not for the traditional religious reasons, but for the sake of their own unique Blut. Not being of Teutonic Blut, they perforce had to have their own Boden: Palestine.
>At first glance it would appear strange that middle-class Jewish students should be so influenced by anti-Semitic thought, especially as at the same time, socialism, with its assimilationist attitudes towards the Jews, was gaining considerable support in the society around them. However, socialism appealed primarily to the workers, not to the middle class. In their environment chauvinism predominated; although intellectually they repudiated their connection with the German people, in fact they never emancipated themselves from the German capitalist class, and throughout the First World War the German Zionists passionately supported their own government. For all their grandiose intellectual pretensions, their völkisch Zionism was simply an imitation of German nationalist ideology. Thus the young philosopher Martin Buber was able to combine Zionism with ardent German patriotism during the First World War. In his book Drei Reden ueber das Judentum, published in 1911, Buber spoke of a youth who:
<senses in this immortality of the generations a community of blood, which he feels to be the antecedents of his I, its perseverance in the infinite past. To that is added the discovery, promoted by this awareness, that blood is a deep rooted nurturing force within individual man; that the deepest layers of our being are determined by blood; that our innermost thinking and our will are colored by it. Now he finds that the world around him is the world of imprints and influences, whereas blood is the realm of a substance capable of being imprinted and influenced, a substance absorbing and assimilating all into its own form Whoever, faced with the choice between environment and substance, decides for substance will henceforth have to be a Jew truly from within, to live as a Jew with all the contradiction, all the tragedy, and all the future promise of his blood. [5]>>2328251on the one hand I want to correct 2023 to 1948
on the other hand I want to remove the word "uniquely" entirely because you would see that, unfortunately, this isn't very unique in human history, especially if you read something like Late Victorian Holocausts or King Leopold's Ghost
>>2328239Yeah, I do. People like you I hate the most. Hope you die IRL, genuinely.
From the bottom of my heart, you faggot on the other side of the screen reading this right now, I want you to know that I sincerely hope you die in ral life.
>>2328229>>2330759Behavior like this is when you have things handed to you on a silver platter your entire life and someone dares to stop you.
>>2328239You are not a special person and never will be, religion is fucking made up and so is yours.
>>2344712Eat shit and die like the pathetic pig you are.
https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/document/mideast/agedict/ch06.htm
>The WZO saw Hitler’s victory in much the same way as its German affiliate, the ZVfD: not primarily as a defeat for all Jewry, but as positive proof of the bankruptcy of assimilationism and liberalism. Their own hour was at hand. Zionists began to sound like tent-revivalists: Hitler was history’s flail to drive the stiff-necked Jews back to their own kind and their own land. A recent Zionist convert, the then world-famous popular biographer Emil Ludwig, was interviewed by a fellow Zionist on a visit to America and expressed the general attitude of the Zionist movement:
<“Hitler will be forgotten in a few years, but he will have a beautiful monument in Palestine. You know”, and here the biographer-historian seemed to assume the role of a patriarchal Jew – “the coming of the Nazis was rather a welcome thing. So many of our German Jews were hovering between two coasts; so many of them were riding the treacherous current between the Scylla of assimilation and the Charybdis of a nodding acquaintance with Jewish things. Thousands who seemed to be completely lost to Judaism were brought back to the fold by Hitler, and for that I am personally very grateful to him.” [3]
>Ludwig was a newcomer to the movement, but his views were in complete concord with those of such veterans as the celebrated Chaim Nachman Bialik, thought of then as the poet laureate of Zion. Because of his reputation, his statements were given wide circulation both by the Zionist movement and its left-wing enemies. The poet’s concern had long been the breakdown of Jewish unity resulting from the decline of traditional religious faith, and now he could not hide his happiness that Hitler had come just in time to save German Jewry from its own destruction.
<Hitlerism, the poet feels, has rendered at least one service in drawing no lines between the faithful Jew and the apostate Jew. Had Hitler excepted the baptized Jews, there would have developed, Bialik contended, the unedifying spectacle of thousands of Jews running to the baptismal fonts. Hitlerism has perhaps saved German Jewry, which was being assimilated into annihilation. At the same time, it has made the world so conscious of the Jewish problem, that they can no longer ignore it. [4]
>Bialik, like many other Zionists, thought of the Jews as something of a super race; if only they would finally come to their senses and stop wasting themselves on an ungrateful humanity and started working in their own vineyard.
<Indeed it is quite true that Judaism, by penetrating into all the nations actually did undermine the remnants of that sort of idolatry … but perhaps the strongest forces in this process were our “apostate” or “assimilated” Jews of all types, who entered into the very body of Christianity and stirred its very bowels, and went on slowly undermining the remnants of paganism as a result of their Jewish volition and their Jewish blood. I, too, like Hitler, believe in the power of the blood idea. These were the men – although often the names of great non-Jews are called in their stead – who smoothed the roads for the great movements of freedom all over the world: The Renaissance, Liberalism, Democracy, Socialism and Communism … Anti-Semites sometimes have clear discernment. Jewish influence has indeed been very powerful in this connection; we ought not to deny it. [5]
>However, by 1934 Zionism was a movement claiming over a million members world-wide and not all of them accepted the upside-down notion that Hitler really was a boon to the Jews. Some, like the American rabbi, Abraham Jacobson, protested against this insane idea, which was still quite widespread even as late as 1936:
<How many times have we heard the impious wish uttered in despair over the apathy of American Jews to Zionism, that a Hitler descend upon them? Then they would realize the need for Palestine! ([6] >Why the fuck are zionists so cartoonishly unhinged?
Judaism is a deeply narcissistic religion with unhinged victim complex where Jews are the eternal victim for people reacting often to bad behaviour, and Israel turns that narcissistic attitude into a ethno-nationalist project.
The end game of Ethno nationalism is unhinged victim/superiority complex fuelled Narcissism, and Israel has had fuel poured on this, as the entire West feeds into it by constantly presenting Jews and Israel as uniquely special and playing along with terrible behaviour from Jews and Israelis due to the Holocaust. So take a child with NPD then spoil the shit out of them and side with them in their bullying of others, the result is Israel.
Narcissistic personality disorder, is the national attitude of Israelis and Zionists.
>how easy it is for literally any mf to consider them to be objectively evil.
They are insane narcissists, Israeli's and the majority of Jews will call you a dirty Nig.. sorry, "Goyim" to your face, punch you in the stomach then cry victim when you punch them back in the face, and the police and courts will side with them that they were the victim and totally unprovoked. Israelis and Zionist Jews honestly believe they are the unprovoked victims. Non-Zionist Jews are mostly just Jews with self awareness and can see how this attitude will result in "Antisemitism", thus even Non-Zionist Judaism is largely driven by Jewish victim mentality.
Evangelicals are driven by dunning kruger mental retardation, Jews are driven by NPD and Muslims are driven by pathological Inferiority complex.
>>2352193I don't really see this "victim" mentality among Israels though. I see some of it aimed at external audiences (mainly Americans) but it comes across as cynical to me, like propaganda. You know that clip of Bibi going "it's puuuuure antisemitism!" Like, he's doing that in English to Americans, he's trying to move Americans in his direction but he doesn't actually give a fuck about that. I see a whiny self-victimization among American Jews constantly with its added Ashkenazi kvetching but that's not really unique to American Jews, it's pervasive across the society. Israelis on the other hand come across to me as very stubborn, brutal, blunt, and aggressive. This was a really popular song there for example.
>They are insane narcissists, Israeli's and the majority of Jews will call you a dirty Nig.. sorry, "Goyim" to your face, punch you in the stomach then cry victim when you punch them back in the face, and the police and courts will side with them that they were the victim and totally unprovoked. The U.S. serves as Israel's lawyer so you might extend this metaphor, but like I was saying, it's not the U.S. where the worst thing that can usually happen is someone getting punched in the face. It's a suicide bomber blowing up a restaurant or a ballistic missile blowing up an apartment building. It's not about hurt feelings because of mean words.
>>2351191Do you think people left their land voluntarily?
Do you think Empire's soldiers only killed enemy soldiers?
Do you think they killed those people without some sadism?
It must've been a dream come true for mass murderers, hacking off arms, ears and scalping people while still alive, raping women and children, bayoneting elderly up their ass and then being shipped back and being hailed as hero that defended Empire from the savages. Some couldn't stop, so they did it back home, a weird influx of mass murderers after every war. Others just "don't want to talk about it".
Unique IPs: 46