Bordiga's critique of Stalin/ML (really, democratic centralism) was literally "if I was in charge, I would have purged better." That's what organic centralism is when you remove the flowery, poetic language. That there is no need for any sort of democratic discourse because he's really smart and knows the trve scientific interpretation of praxis, better than Marx even since he recommended the Irish fight for independence and to engage in electoralism. I've similarly seen italian-leftcoms mock MLs for their claim that it was singularly Khrushchev that "dismantled socialism" for being great man bullshit but then they turn around and say the same thing about Stalin, refusing to recognize that Lenin's opportunism led to Stalinism. Lenin even was the first to give up on internationalism when he made a treaty with Germany, which I accept as a rational move, but it still had its effects. Treaty of Brest-Litovsk was a prelude to the Molotov pact.
Even that quote doesn't work since they consider themselves the trve followers of Lenin when Lenin was writing about integrating with reactionary organizations like trade unions which, by its nature of existence, involves class collaboration. I just can't follow how they claim to simultaneously embody purity while ignoring all the contradictions to the theory they claim to engage with.
>>2340105>is there any theorist that writes about us all putting aside our differences and working together??? <3Here you go bro