[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


 

Honest question: why don’t radical leftists agree to volunteer at group homes for disabled adults or become special education teachers?

As the fear of mass eugenics is becoming a reality in America, we can all see how the disabled (in particular, people with intellectual disabilities and neurodivergent differences) will soon be set up for mass eradication. The disabled aren’t “parasites” but full and equal human individuals who deserve respect, dignity and autonomy. They are hated in capitalism on the basis that they aren’t “useful” to the system. We also see instances where RFK is trying to wipe out autistic identities by creating a eugenicist “autism registry.”

Given this, why aren’t radical leftists dedicating most of their activism towards fighting and advocating for the disabled? Or dedicating their time and every to caring for those who are entirely dependent on the care of others to survive. Truth is we ALL need care from others. Why focus on any other issue when eugenics is the biggest evil in our world today and needs to be defeated before anything else?

I strongly believe radical leftists need to work and care for disabled people and we can start doing that by agreeing to be special Ed teachers (and thereby advocate for disabled children) or work at group homes for disabled adults. That’s a much better use of our energy and VALUES than protesting or political organizing. Eugenics is at the heart of capitalism and there’s no revolution without the disabled.
336 posts and 19 image replies omitted.

>>2404849
Why does it matter? Eugenics IS the backbone of capitalism and refuse to care for the disabled IS eugenics and therefore abetting capitalism.

>>2404845
I’m not taking care of this. Ever.

I would rather an hero than deal with this.

>>2404845
how does that end the genocide in gaza?

Deep down we still have eugenics morals, it's kind of natural thing to want to better one's offspring, honestly is immoral in my view to desire that you child suffer some kind of disability, old style eugenics was pretty bad, but liberal type eugenics is kind of ok and right in my view.

>>2404884
The Palestinian issue is ultimately an issue of eugenics.

>>2404893
If you can’t raise a disabled child you shouldn’t have children at all.

>>2404546
If autism isn’t “really a disability” like you argue, and the difficulties of autism are primarily due to nurture and being “held back” by parents, teachers, etc., how do you explain all the late-diagnosed autistic people who were raised as if they were allistic but had huge difficulties under the surface and could barely survive in the real world after leaving home?

>>2404897
I'm not denying that, hell I actually full agree with your statement, that why I think abortion and pre natal screening would be free and easy accessible to all so to avoid this sad fate for the parents and the child, life is already hard for normal people, imagine a life for a child with disability, is brutal.

>>2404908
Prenatal testing will always be eugenics. You can’t argue otherwise.

>>2404915
Fetuses are not people even if they have a genetic disorder. Better to abort tards than to bring them into a family that doesn’t want them.

Don’t know why what OP is proposing is controversial. Imagine Marxists applying DiaMat and Lysenkoism to autism intervention. We can do away with the medical model and biological determinism in the field if we get involved. Why not become autism therapists and offer Marxist-based therapies in order to counter ABA?

>>2404921
Your neomalthusian dehumanization protocol is bourgeois

>>2404940
Fetuses aren’t people.

>>2404943
Your semantic bullshit means nothing. Neomalthusian imperialist like you are not people.

>>2404915
>>2404915
Let me get this straight, you prefer to put a child witj a disability into the world because you think pre natal abortion is eugenics? Do you legit care about the life of the child? The impression I get you prefer people to pump 1000 child with disability to live through hell in life because pre natal is "eugenics" and hurt you feelings, Jesus Christ sometimes people here cam be downright stupid and malicious and they claim to be "progressive" and "leftist".

>>2404947
>let people put 1000000 children with disabilities into the world because if they don't will hurt my feelings

Absolute insanity and beyond retarded

>>2404954
Leftism is entirely about fighting eugenics. Not eradicating the disabled. Look at Iceland which has almost zero Down Syndrome children because they aborted them all. That’s Nazi.

>>2404959
>Leftism is entirely about fighting eugenics.
huh?

>>2404966
OP is a troll

>>2404959
>>2404959
Let me tell some cold hard facts, the Earth is finite, we don't have infinity resources, may as well make it count and make life of those already living as good as possible, if you have a choice to not bring to life a life with very serious disability that will drain the resources for long time without actually adding into the economics system, then yeah not bring that life is the optimal decision here, life is hard and complicated, if you have the option to avoid bringing more hardship upon itself and other, then it's better do it, I get the impression that you don't deal with people with disability in real life, I do, daily, I can say that not bring a disability into the world is far better, Iceland is right, and woman have their right to decide if they want to bring the child into the world, you don't care a iota for the life of the child or the woman, because it's just your egotistical feelings, grow up kid or start volunteering to a home group to see the harsh reality.

>>2404959
> Look at Iceland which has almost zero Down Syndrome children because they aborted them all. That’s Nazi.
They gave parents the option without pushing it onto them (basically just telling them that their kid is likely to have it) and most of the people given that information ended up aborting. It's in no way comparable to the Nazis.

>>2404987
This is a neoliberal bourgeois argument. Resources aren’t “finite” and we don’t need to eradicate the disabled.

>>2404990
Basically, we can tell that most people, given the choice, would not want to raise a disabled child. That's just the grim reality of it. So you're either pro-abortion, which is mildly pro-eugenics, or you're anti-abortion which is just reactionary.

>>2404956
Your sentence is unintelligible. You must self-abort immediately

>>2404893
>liberal type eugenics
You’re a fascist

>>2360477
They’re not oppressing women. They say something “sexist” by accident because they do not understand proper social interactions.
Stop being a fascist

>>2405029
There’s no excuse for lack of self-awareness, much less misogyny.

>>2405038
Could you provide examples of this “misogyny”?
Did someone call you fat and you thought it was misogynistic?

>>2405069
Me telling an autistic man “no” several times and him refusing to stop perusing me. That’s misogyny I want no excuses for. Autistic men don’t deserve women.

>>2405096
That’s likely because he wasn’t taught to say “no”.
This happens to normalfag men all the time. It’s not unique for autistic men.

>>2405099
Autistic men have very noticeable issues concerning lack of self-awareness and very, very rigid thinking. They can’t take “no” for an answer and don’t even realize that they’re being cruel or sexist. Turn him down and he will desperately try to use “logic” to entrap you. Autistic men can prove that they’re worthy of female romance or else they can spend the rest of their lives lonely.

>>2405116
> Autistic men have very noticeable issues concerning lack of self-awareness and very, very rigid thinking.
Autistic women have the same attributes. Not that this is “rigid” but it’s more or less black and white.
Do you know how many neurotypical men do the same thing? Neurotypical men are worse because they don’t see things as black and white.
Autistic people are more or less like Germans, you follow the rules or you’re in the wrong.
Let me ask you about Israeli women in the IDF raping Palestinian boys. Should all Israeli women be considered rapists by default?

>>2360477
>men with stunted emotional and social development need a mother figure
>this is patriarchy's fault
honestly I want to be sympathetic to you but you're such a caricature lmao.

>>2405146
I’m an autistic woman myself.

Autistic men can either work on their deficiencies or die alone. I don’t care. They’re not my priority, and I’m not obligated to sacrifice my support needs for their support needs.

>>2405169
are you trans btw

>>2405146
Most autistic women aren’t diagnosed until they’re well into adulthood, meaning they were forced to abide by neurotypical norms and had to be self-aware. Hell, even early diagnosed autistic women were usually held to a much higher standard growing up than autistic males.

Even autistic transwomen will admit they were able to unmask more often pre-transition when they lived as men.


>>2405172
That’s a product of patriarchy, particularly in the dumbfuckistan reactionary areas of the world.
I’ve met autistic women who have no clue how to “mask” and openly said “offensive” things out loud without realizing it.
I was in Sea Scouts and I remember this one girl shouted “let’s play spot the faggot” when we drove into San Francisco. It pissed off the rest of the people on the bus but I laughed.

>>2405165
Most women don’t want to be romantically tied to a man who’s emotionally 14-years old and can’t work.

I’m certain they wouldn’t want to date NT men who have similar traits to autistic men either.

File: 1753583573079.png (25.98 KB, 984x444, 1742901502310342.png)

>>2405177
trvke
being awkward, disabled, and unemployed is more ick-inducing to a woman than being a serial killer. autistic men need to get their shit together.

>>2405176
>That’s a product of patriarchy,

>literally gives an example of autistic women behaving badly too


You know autism and patriarchy can work off each other, right?

And again, why are autistic men entitled to romantic relationships, especially if they have shit social skills, can’t hold down a job, and see most women as mother figures rather than 50/50 partners?

>>2405176
She said the autistic man she dealt with wouldn’t leave her alone because his rigid thinking made him unable to take no for an answer.

You’re essentially proving her point by berating her.

Autism and disability in general do not entitle you to romance.

>>2405182
What made you suggest I was?
Also, the rigidity is not the problem she experienced. It was the fact that shithole areas of the U.S. don’t teach men to say “no”.
If he was taught “no” and if he was actually autistic, I can pretty much guarantee there would be no problem.

>>2405169
Self-diagnosed?
Masker?

>>2405179
How do you expect them to do that exactly? Should blind guys get their shit together?

>>2405180
>And again, why are autistic men entitled to romantic relationships, especially if they have shit social skills, can’t hold down a job, and see most women as mother figures rather than 50/50 partners?
Everyone is entitled to a relationship. Doesn't mean you have to be the one to date them, but they deserve to be loved unless they're some horrible person that is a danger to those around them.

Communism won't be achieved until we eliminate loneliness.

>>2405182
I'm gonna go out on a limb and assume she made no attempt to reason with the autistic man and simply treated him like a neurotypical normie where "no means no". Autistic people are bad at interpreting social cues, that doesn't mean they're creepy or misogynist or mean to harm you. Doesn't help that young men get a ton of mixed signals both by pop culture and the adults around them to be simultaneously aggressive and persistent with women, and without a woman in your life to teach you boundaries it's basically impossible to navigate alone. That's patriarchy, sure, but you're basically just singling out autistic men for not being as good at navigating intricate social situations, when they are usually the victim and one being alienated in social situations. People take advantage of autistic men all the time, especially women when you act awkwardly around them and they know you like them, they'll use you as much as they can for favors while justifying it to themselves as "just being nice" even though everyone around them knows what's going on. It's pretty frustrating that women will give you all the same cues they give a neurotypical man, but just because you're autistic she infantilizes you in her mind, and the mere notion of romantic attraction from your end immediately kills your relationship with her. If we're saying autistic men need to be able to take a hint, then I'd also say women need to stop being so patronizing towards us and treat us like men instead of infants, jfc. You don't have to care for me or act protective in the workplace if you're gonna get upset at me for developing an attraction over it.

Call me crazy but I think the way autistics approach romance is more genuine and sincere than the weird patriarchal rituals being performed in modern culture. When you like a girl, you want to get her a gift or spend time around her or get to know her interests and display your worth by engaging in those interests. That's how most autistic men conceptualize romance, something simplistic where time/effort spent is rewarded in kind by affection from the girl. In hunter gatherer cultures, this is pretty much how it works. If you strip society down to eliminate all the patriarchy and bullshit, autistic men aren't really in the wrong for behaving this way. It's everyone else that's wrong for attaching unrelated expectations like socioeconomic value, social class, and racial/cultural barriers to love.

But also I am a diagnosed autistic and I've learned through constant failures that the things women find attractive are simultaneously intangible and heavily based on culture rather than the material. Even if you're the nicest guy, displaying tons of loyalty and devotion, and shower her in thoughtful affection and praise, it's pretty normal for a woman to get the ick based on your employment status or your lack of friends or your choice of hobbies, things that are totally immaterial to romance, and autistic men struggle with accepting that society doesn't work the way it "should".

To put it in video game terms for my fellow autistics, autists view romance as a typical jrpg or fighting game. Everyone starts at 0, and you input resources, effort, time, and perseverance into it and are rewarded with an increasing power level, whether it's through tangible level ups like an rpg or through increased skill like fighting games. But the way normies, and especially women, view romance is more like a trading card game. If you don't have the best cards, you'll never be competitive. It doesn't matter how much time or effort you put into the game, without 3 copies of Blue Eyes Charizard Dragon in your deck, you'll never make it to regionals or even nationals. And when you play against a fellow player, especially a woman, they can sniff out if you lack key necessary cards in your deck at specific phases of the game, and will immediately get the ick. Your options at that point are either to give up on the game, or go back to the drawing board and play a deck you do have the cards for, ie installing Grindr. There is no perseverance or skill expression here, you cannot tryhard your way to getting a girlfriend, in fact the more you try the more of a losing streak you'll develop and the more discouraged you'll become.

why did I type all this I need my meds

>>2405180
>autistic women behaving badly too
>behaving badly
You’re a lib
Also, she didn’t grope me, neurotypical women did because neurotypicals don’t follow rules.

>>2404577
>>2404907

>elopement

>SIB

These are generally good; we should teach NTs these.

>Int. Disability


Fair, but based on the studies provided, this is rare, since, based on the studies provided, this only applies to 30% of nonverbals, if we are making very lofty assumptions, which would be only be 10% of autistic people in general if we include minimalistically verbal autists; Not saying it never happens, or even that it's not predominant in autists, but it would be very rare.

>Nurture


While now that you mention it, it's delusional to say "Autism has nothing to do with child rearing" ; While Refridgerator Mother Theory, as proposed by Bettelheim at least, is very likely incorrect, the science does suggest that there is at least some psychogenic quality to ASD, albeit, more so in ASD severity, and likely, with culture itself be involved.

10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0230
10.7759/cureus.42292
10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.5778

So in fact, it doesn't necessarily have to involve awareness that the child is autistic, or even the ideas associated with autists (though it probably does in most cases).

>>2404935

Based; for all his flaws, he would not have treated autists like simple animals. Albeit I would recommend looking into mileu therapy and indigenous child rearing instead.

File: 1753654463653.png (526.6 KB, 1985x517, Jose-Delgado_1.png)

>>2404935
What would a Marxist alternative to ABA consist of? Behaviorism is embraced by the Mechanical Materialists as a legitimate science, even if on the extreme end it can turn people into furniture. There is a Lacanian alternative, but it's not teachable or applicable in the same data-centric way as ABA, and good luck getting direct support workers to study Lacan for $14/hr. The work-centric approach is lacking (in America) because of post-industrialism, the intensity of automation, and the danger of having people with intellectual disabilities use power tools for example. Walmart greeter status jobs are tax-breaks for corporations, but they don't produce surplus value. I'm interested in how AI-empowered personal assistant type software could enable a more regulated ABA intervention, but it seems like that will just end with electroshock "therapy" to correct behavior, with the aim to expand this tech to normies Delgado style.


Unique IPs: 24

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]