[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


File: 1750583369548.webp (31.32 KB, 900x750, sigmund-freud-2.webp)

 

Your opinion on this guy says everything I need to know about you. Are you

1) The kind of person to answer "How would you feel if you ate breakfast this morning?" with "But I didn't"

2) A member of the manchild inteligentsia

3) A secret third thing

He was 50% right 50% wrong. Oedipus complex was just him projecting his mommy issues outwards but on other stuff like defense mechanisms, ego, etc. he was right.

>1) The kind of person to answer "How would you feel if you ate breakfast this morning?" with "But I didn't"
Isn't this some made up non-existent experiment that was fabricated on /pol/ and all the dumb asses there ate it up and used it to mean that black people are le low autism score?
Chud lolcow Synthetic Man mentioned it and then it was found out to be sourced to a /pol/ 4plebs screenshot

Freud was a pioneer to his field, he established some interesting ideas while others have been abandoned. I still believe reactionaries have an obsession with other men's penises and women they like being raped, though.

Freud was to psychoanalysis what Marx was to political-economy. Lenin=Lacan.

>>2346758
>Lenin
<The mention of Freud’s hypothesis is designed to give the pamphlet a scientific veneer, but it is so much bungling by an amateur. Freud’s theory has now become a fad. I mistrust sex theories expounded in articles, treatises, pamphlets, etc. — in short, the theories dealt with in that specific literature which sprouts so luxuriantly on the dung heap of bourgeois society. I mistrust those who are always absorbed in the sex problems, the way an Indian saint is absorbed in the contemplation of his navel. It seems to me that this superabundance of sex theories, which for the most part are mere hypotheses, and often quite arbitrary ones, stems from a personal need. It springs from the desire to justify one’s own abnormal or excessive sex life before bourgeois morality and to plead for tolerance towards oneself. This veiled respect for bourgeois morality is as repugnant to me as rooting about in all that bears on sex. No matter how rebellious and revolutionary it may be made to appear, it is in the final analysis thoroughly bourgeois.

>>2346797
thank you lenin

>>2346732
yeah but nooticing things like that is an exercise in elementary psychology and is hardly worthy of being deemed 'psychoanalysis'

>>2346750
possibly? im not online enough to know. u get my point

>>2346751
he was a pioneer in seduction theory at least

>>2346758
2

Nietzschean non sense

>>2346797
bodied that freak

The call for a socialist revolution is really just an unfinished anal phase of revolt against the parental figures. I am smart.

He is unironically one of the most brilliant people in history. Capitalism hates psychoanalysis because it is an effective long-term treatment that focuses on introspection.

His ideas may seem bizarre but they are normal childish things. I remember when I was 6 years old I had many female friends who said were envious of boys because they had penises.

Modern society tends to see children as angels incapable of doing anything, but they constantly pry about death, violence, and things like that.

>>2347058
Psychoanalysis a la the fixation on the male phallus is an ego defence for men who were made fun of by a pretty girl when they were a child

>>2347135
did you ask those girls why cuz usually it's something like 'i would be able to pee standing up'

Are you stroking out OP or do you have some other medical emergency?
Remember FAST

I don't know enough to form an opinion on this man.

Freud damaged literature for many years. Novels before Freud are a breath of fresh air because they're not riddled with Freudian BS.

>>2347150
> it's something like 'i would be able to pee standing up'
yeah it's basically it, and that they wish they were stronger

But that's exactly what penis envy is about, however I think males are even more jealous of women because they can create life, and have the power of rejecting and choosing mates

>>2347187
Womb envy is pathetic radfem cope.

>>2347058
All french theory is just this but with many jargon
In fact, nietzsche invented this shit in the first place

>>2346797
>Lenin has the final word on everything, even things he has second hand murky beliefs of
Yawn

>>2347146
>Psychoanalysis a la the fixation on the male phallus
Thousands of non western cultures are on the record for fixating on the phallus. Read some anthropology, ffs.


>>2346839
>yeah but nooticing things like that is an exercise in elementary psychology and is hardly worthy of being deemed 'psychoanalysis'

it only seems like that because freudian psychoanalysis was a genuine paradigm shift in how people think about internality. the fact that the unconscious, defense mechanism, and developmental stages in childrens' psyche are 'common sense' but freud was the first to try to seriously account for them is great evidence of just how significant a thinker he was

>>2346717
This is an empirical science neighborhood. Speculation not backed by data is not welcome

File: 1750619024726.png (1.55 MB, 1009x1500, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2346717
My answer? See picrel.

>>2347640
That answer's name? Albertix Einsteinnari

>>2347542
it really wasn't. even aristotle and plato wrote about such things.

>>2346717
Wasn't right about everything but had some good points

>>2347636
I'm going to find a heinrichian on here just to see what happens

>>2346717
He's the OG self improvement grifter, only fools believe is his bullshit.

Freud's intent was to uncover the functions of the mind beyond the rationalizations that people will consciously give for their action. His method was through interpreting the conscious content, complicated by symptomatic behavior of patients, and combined with speculative systems on top of what was available to empirical science at the time. It's too stupid how many people still insist Freud was doing some kind of vodoo magic hypnosis like his actual work isn't available for real critique.

File: 1750802710852.png (230.21 KB, 1342x553, freudianism.png)

>>2349862
>It's too stupid how many people still insist Freud was doing some kind of vodoo magic hypnosis


Unique IPs: 21

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]