>>2364565it frames the premise of the questions towards it. like if you say you believe in freedom it gives you a +1 to libertarian. to score authoritarian you would have to say that you "strongly disagree" with freedom instead of something more naunced like freedom coming from necessity or being enabled by the construction of a material base of production that supports it.
after a quick scan "Schools should not make classroom attendance compulsory." for example. is compulsory education authoritarian? or is being illiterate a barrier to freedom? this example is literally freedom is no homework tier idealism, where a materialist would say having more capacity to act gives you more freedom of choice. the kind of person whos biggest obstacle in life is being told what to do by their parents might think freedom is being able to do whatever they want, while a person without access to education might think they have less freedom because they dont even have the option. the test does not distinguish and will call you hitlerstalin if you think kids should learn to read.
results will be further biased by the fact that you have internet and be able to read to take the test. leftvalues has the same issue where it puts things into a binary opposition when thats not necessarily true, like it will say you are against environmentalism just because you are for industry and vice versa as if human flourishing and environmental protection are necessarily at odds. theres even questions where if you "agree" it will move you away from a position because the question assumes that the statement is negative, but its possible to think whatever it is a good thing or inconsequential. or you could end up with a mess of results because you answer "agree" to a series of things that are contradictory because you think they are all good ideas but which ones should be implemented depends on material conditions, like questions about centralization and bureaucracy. so its less about what you ultimately believe and more about assuming that your talking only about your own country and what applies to the material conditions there, but the framing implies that tendency is universal and doesn't give you the option to say different material conditions call for different strategies.