[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


 

seeing this graph got me thinking

it is political compass slop and the political compass is bullshit but it's still very interesting in this context


Why are the libleft and authright the most fetishistic quadrants?

and also another really interesting thing

the sample size for men (15k) is much larger than the sample size for women (5k) because women take the political compass test much less than men. thus the woman graph is much more oriented towards the extremes on all sides because to be a political compass involved woman is to be much weirder compared to the norm for women and thus more permitting of extremism although political compass stuff is in both cases outside of the norm

i must add that it's highly likely that a signicant part of the female respondents were trans women and that's safe to assume if you're on /leftypol/ and have interacted with many political extremists

and this got me wondering why cis women don't get involved with terminally online shit as much

i think this has everything to do with the fact that cis women rarely go beyond the major socially acceptable online spaces (instagram, tiktok, snapchat, sometimes even youtube is too niche, and only the hyper-mainstream slop areas of these areas)

discord, reddit, 4chan and altchans, even youtube on occassion, and the less mainstream regions of tiktok, youtube, and ig are basically all men and trans women

for example almost every man i've ever met from gen z has heard of Chris Chan and only one woman.

why is this?

are women just less autistic or is the autism just expressed different

i think it will be the difference of expression

the material conditions of the time lead to a very strange paradox in which women are marginalized, this is clear from anyone who has lived in society, that in lingustics generally the male sex is given first-order preference fore example, and that men too are alienated as seen clearly by suicide rates and the rise of the (highly retarded) incel movement and increase in (say the line) male lonlieness. this leads to different expressions of the same alienation with the present material conditions and the frequent failure to realize class conciousness from both sexes as they simply blame the other sex for their problems. we can see that a hyper-capitalist society like south korea has this extremely accelerated.

god i wish guy debord was still alive

>no heels

Fuck off

wrong
I am a feet lover and I am authoritarian left

there is not such thing as "authoritarian" or "libertarian"

>>2358674
>all correlations were very small
Study immediately discarded. A thread died for this garbage. >>>/siberia/

>>2358674
if i were to guess its probably because liblef is where most people will probably gravitate to just because its the least notably deplorable of the 4 to normies
>stalin pol pot mao
>hitler hitler hitler
>"uh they're kinda annoying and gay i guess"
>thatcher, unrelating capitalism
another factor i would say is that if youre very into what most would call idenity politics and lgbt shit then youre simply going to probably be thinking about sex more than most and probably also more deeply

It's immediately suspect because women don't have paraphilias. The closest is a general masochism.

>>2358674
>Why are the libleft and authright the most fetishistic quadrants?
because of the way the test was made most people fall into those quadrants. to get authleft or libright you have to basically lie because the test present false premises to make you a libertarian socialist

>>2358674
>Auth Right:
>scat
>bestiality
>sounding
>raceplay
Lmao


>>2359717
Or maybe you don't actually agree with Stalinism

>far left unity: group sex
>right: ageplay, pedophilia
Maybe the politcal compass is an accurate model after all

>>2360664
the test was made by a neoliberal. dont be sily

>>2360672
Ok but do you really think Stalin would approve of your views whatever they are. Do you think he would use this board

>>2360674
no, thats not really the same thing as doing a test.

>>2359625
>ive never had sex with a woman
ok

>>2360664
no, the test is literally made to put you in the green quadrant. which is why even ben shapiro got placed there when he did the test a few years ago.

>>2360682
>no, the test is literally made to put you in the green quadrant
How?
>b-but Ben Shapiro!
Maybe he's a grifter?


im such a good leftist

Jreg deboonked this

>>2364565
it frames the premise of the questions towards it. like if you say you believe in freedom it gives you a +1 to libertarian. to score authoritarian you would have to say that you "strongly disagree" with freedom instead of something more naunced like freedom coming from necessity or being enabled by the construction of a material base of production that supports it.

after a quick scan "Schools should not make classroom attendance compulsory." for example. is compulsory education authoritarian? or is being illiterate a barrier to freedom? this example is literally freedom is no homework tier idealism, where a materialist would say having more capacity to act gives you more freedom of choice. the kind of person whos biggest obstacle in life is being told what to do by their parents might think freedom is being able to do whatever they want, while a person without access to education might think they have less freedom because they dont even have the option. the test does not distinguish and will call you hitlerstalin if you think kids should learn to read.

results will be further biased by the fact that you have internet and be able to read to take the test. leftvalues has the same issue where it puts things into a binary opposition when thats not necessarily true, like it will say you are against environmentalism just because you are for industry and vice versa as if human flourishing and environmental protection are necessarily at odds. theres even questions where if you "agree" it will move you away from a position because the question assumes that the statement is negative, but its possible to think whatever it is a good thing or inconsequential. or you could end up with a mess of results because you answer "agree" to a series of things that are contradictory because you think they are all good ideas but which ones should be implemented depends on material conditions, like questions about centralization and bureaucracy. so its less about what you ultimately believe and more about assuming that your talking only about your own country and what applies to the material conditions there, but the framing implies that tendency is universal and doesn't give you the option to say different material conditions call for different strategies.

lol pol"sci"

File: 1753379482878.png (Spoiler Image,2.43 MB, 1280x1393, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2358674
Daily reminder that picrel is the only real political compass

Left wing is bottom left and right wing is top right. Anything else is just cryptofascism or ultra liberalism.

>Why are the libleft and authright the most fetishistic quadrants?
never heard of the anarkiddy to fascist pipeline?
they are the same sort of creature.

>>2402189
>left wing of capital is only liberalism and right wing of capital is only fascism (even doe liberalism incubates fascism)

File: 1753380338188-0.png (21.3 KB, 330x330, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1753380338188-1.png (15.59 KB, 188x268, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1753380338188-2.png (113.6 KB, 1920x1152, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1753380338188-3.png (251.51 KB, 2560x1570, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2402191
<anarchist infighting be like

>>2402192
<when you have slave society but at least its not feudalism or capitalism

>>2402209
<implying anarchism isn't a bourgeois post-feudal post-slave economy ideology

File: 1753380812268.png (103.94 KB, 220x229, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2402212
The real trvthnvke we've all been ignoring is that Proudhon's "anarchie" is not the same as the greek ἀναρχία, the former of which is a byproduct of liberalism of the 18th century whereas the latter is a timeless concept.

>>2402212
>when you have a classless society but its bourgeoisie according to cryptofascoids

>>2402222
>when you have a "classless society" but trade and resource accumulation end up retreating back to capitalist class division since the producers exchange their products and recreate market economics

>>2402227
This is the part where all mutualists, syndicalists and other faggots get btfo and accept some kind of planning or eat a bag full of dicks for clutching on Proudhon, Bakunin, Sorel instead of just accepting Marx's analysis of the capitalist mode of production and living on with Carlos and Malatesta to the trial of if the thesis of the withering of the state is credible as a strategy and accept the administration of things with assigned roles defeat the captain of the ship slander by threat of mutiny over abuse of position of responsibility which disbalances power temporarily for assigned tasks

>>2402227
The only solution is clearly to have a slave owner class to prevent this.

>>2402230
If the productive forces develop doooo it
one goal for all of this nonsense of development - immortality, automation and spontaneous restructuring of materials by reaction

>>2402231
>spontaneous restructuring of materials by reaction
AKA creating fucking realities AKA literal fucking Actually Existing Magic

>>2402232
It will be the same as "magic" cause it would be impossible for a person to explain all the undergoing processes that have lead up to it LOL

>>2402233
WARPING reality? FROM the SCARCITY OF EARTH? This doesn't even cover Kardashev scale.

literally every rightoid including liberal, ancrap/liberturdian and fascist, is a sado-masochist. it's at the core of the rightoid character. masters & servants.
the graphs are bullshit rightoid propaganda. rightoids project a lot and like to lie to themselves too

>the most libertarian women are into femdom
uhhhh what?

I hate Aella, what a fucking psychopathic grifter of a whorish woman, I can't take her seriously

>>2406717
Grok, is this real?

>>2406739
I guess they don't want the state police to investigate disappearances around their town and check their basements

>>2406744
Thanks, Grok. When will Grok 4 be free for peasants like me?


Unique IPs: 25

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]