i really want to understand how lenin, stalin, mao, kim, xi etc. managed to turn so many shitholes into nuclear superpowers
the 5 year plans always seems to follow the same pattern though
>nationalize an industry
>up production
>profit
>reinvest into industry
>expand into new industry
>repeat
>>2362874>"Socialist" state<Capital accumulationand if you don't see the problem with this, it's over
let alone the fact that a state can and will never be socialist
>>2362794basically all developmental economies do this. Even the capitalist economies did this
park chung hee
chiang kai shek
lee kuan yew
ministry of international trade and industry japan
>>2363035then dont call it communism
>it's so over for the real movementthings no one said
>>2362990Anarchists being irrelevant illiterate retards, take #3493051830921509152
A tale as old as time itself.
>>2363520>vulnerable and desperateShe was 17 and 11 months, you fuckin freak! You're going away for a long time. Reminds me of this discourse. African countries can't consent, they are ""vulnerable""
Better leave them in the loving hands of the IMF eh
>>2363024>park chung heeDidn't do it
>chiang kai shekNope
>lee kuan yewLolno
>ministry of international trade and industry japanDidn't do it either
>>2362794>>2363042Gaynazi gets closest to the truth.
Agricultural exports (together with some lumber & petroleum) provided the foreign exchange earnings used to import foreign
tech.
The internal accumulation policy however was the feldman-mahalanobis model: That is the % of investment goods & services allocated to expanding investment goods & services industries themselves was increased relative to that of consumer goods & services producing industries.
In concrete terms this meant expansion of not only cenent, steel, machine parts, etc. but also increased education.
The enabling factor for this being the freeing up labour for this was collectivization & basic mechanization of agriculture, both of which combined radically increased labour productivity in agriculture (Though productivity per acre/hectare/km^2 grew very slowly in the pre-war by comparison).
>>2363716except we are talking about capital accumulation, not capital itself
and the reproduction and accumulation of capital can only occur inside a bourgeouis system of production you nonce
>>2363793This is equivocation on the word 'capital'. It doesn't mean the same thing in neoclassical econ. as it does in marxist econ.
In neoclassical its basically a substitute for machinery, plants, etc. (ie. any tool that helps production that isn't labour or a natural resource).
>>2363812Capital accumulation: 😡
Capital accumulation, China: 🤩
Unique IPs: 31