Camaradie~~
This is a more ethical question more than a philosophical one.
In a perfect world where we were to established the full dream of marxist, industrial singularity, post-scarcity, luxury for all..
(maybe almost in that fully automated luxury gay communism - nb)
For the sake of the argument, not the stereotypical dystopian depiction as everyone identical soulless beings:
What could it ever miss? What would be the only thing, if you'd please give the input, be lacking?
I find Zizek's perspective very satisfying in that: If we reach that perfect state as a whole, throughout the world, completely nullifying any chance to go back to the capitalistic world, no vulnerability left: He defers with all the automated machinization, he would for aesthetics and furthering the infinite progress, writing theory, creating, enjoying things near hedonistically out of endless comfort, ever-improving,
again, what would it miss to your thinking?
Honestly, the only thing that reaches me is having a strong moral compass for what we aught not do. I'm thinking of the game Bioshock here :D
Any and all input is appreciated, I need a perspective on this for my book.
>>2364995I don't like the idea of tokens.
I don't think an ideal communist society would have them.
>>2365090is this WEF bait? retarded.
>>2365094I thought groucho-marx got axed
>>2365096it's just an aesthetic artifact to me.
>>2365145If the transhumanist new world comes to be, could the technology still not be strong as keeping us biologically human?
Limited thinking.
>>2365170"What could a perfect world miss (?), morally"
I have spend years in hard-science research. And what is shown to the masses, the official level of advancement is far behind, way more so, than how things are.