[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


File: 1751660366874.jpg (201.15 KB, 960x1015, 69zsuv2bhrw91.jpg)

 

i have never communicated in any leftist spheres before on the internet and am not particularly a leftist. what are some leftist redpills? how does one come to understand leftist thought? good reading or viewing material would be nice and do not feel obliged to dumb things down.

File: 1751662900123.png (483.25 KB, 500x666, ClipboardImage.png)


I would definitely not take the "online left" as representative. It really sucks. If you can meet comrades on the ground, the odds of having an actually useful conversation is better.

>left

It's kind of a nothing word. Here, it basically means socialists, communists and anarchists. That means progressive liberals don't count, because they're still pro-capitalist.

>what are some leftist redpills?

having a job
Damn, the silly mods removed this site's reading list from the top. For easy introductory reading, I recommend:
The Principles of Communism (1847)
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm
Basically a Q&A-style summary of Marxism. Even though it was written about a hundred and eighty years ago, most of it is still relevant today.
How Marxism Works (1979)
https://www.marxists.org/archive/harman/1979/marxism/index.html
A great introduction with some more depth, more modern and easier to read than something like the Communist Manifesto.

If you mean more general redpills, well, learning that the richer societies (like the US) overproduce so much that there really is no excuse for people to be starving, houseless, have unclean water, lacking cheap-to-produce medicine, these are all artificially scarce because our society is set up so that our work is done so that businesses can make profit, rather than doing work for the sake of improving our society. We now have the technology to fix so many of our problems, but our political economy instead ends up just making billionaires richer and the working class poorer.

The biggest redpill is that you are paying rent to your employer to be allowed to work for him.

>and do not feel obliged to dumb things down
Sorry, I missed that line from tiredness.

I'll focus on Marxism, the dominant strain of anticapitalist thought, although there are many others. Many ideologies around, like liberalism (that includes progressive liberals [Americans call this 'liberalism'], classical liberals [Americans call this 'libertarianism'] and conservative liberals [Americans call this 'conservatism']), fascist ideologies, and others are generally idealistic, they have ideals (e.g. liberty, freedom) and try to apply them to material reality. Marxism instead uses analysis like historical materialism to analyze how the world has worked historically and use that material reality as a basis for the ideology. So a lot of socialist theory is analyzing capitalism's political economy and its contradictions, and understanding how the new social classes it formed (primarily the proletariat and bourgeoisie; the working class and the owning class respectively) relate to each other and the political economy. Marxism proposes that the working class, unlike the owning class, has the most power to create a revolution (as opposed to reform, e.g. fascism) and abolish private property (not to be confused with personal property… we don't want to redistribute your personal home and your toothbrush) and create a society where the working people own the tools of their work and earn the full value produced by their work, as opposed to a parasitic owning class (e.g. bosses, investors) owning the tools and skimming off the profit.

The ultimate 'don't dumb it down' is probably Marx's famous work Capital: A Critique of Political Economy (aka. Das Kapital)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Das_Kapital

>>2371609
>we don't want to redistribute your personal home
Owning land / a home makes you petty booj
Houses will be expropriated in the revolution, especially in settler colonial states

In fact, it's the very first thing ghe bolsheviks did (following the instructions of Engels)


wage labor and capital is like 18-20 pages and pretty straightforward. As you can see >>2371603 is right that the online left is fucking ass and for the most part out of touch egdelords like >>2371617 with no ability to speak with others about socialism in a constructive manner.

>>2370784
Do hate wageslaving or atleast think things could be better in the workplace but feel you have no power to change it?
Then communism is for you.

>>2371603
>Here, it basically means socialists, communists and anarchists.
Communists have nothing to do with the left wing of capital.

>>2370784
>what are some leftist redpills? how does one come to understand leftist thought?
The left is a catch-all for those seeking social change. What I think it really comes down to is thinking for yourself, and holding nothing sacred. That includes no existing historical situation. The right takes up an attitude of opportunism in respect to the world as it is, and tries to either affirm or idealize it, or desires to revert to a state which was once an accomplished fact.

>>2370784
>what are some leftist redpills
bourgeois democracy is simply not a democracy at all
human labor is the basis of all value
we all slave away for a cruel and ever hungy god of our own making, billionaires are simply the hands of this god but they're not even in control, the blind logic of a feedback system that accumulate capital is.
https://ianwrightsite.wordpress.com/2020/09/03/marx-on-capital-as-a-real-god-2/

Fuck "the left!" Long live communism! Lenin said: "Study, study, study!" and study, I shall.

File: 1751789635603.jpg (47.89 KB, 720x720, war to war.jpg)

>>2370784
Depends on where you're starting from but the following might shock people:

In America more money is lost to wage theft than robberies. The brutal struggles that organized labor had to endure to get what we consider basic rights and hours. All kinds of trivia about global inequality. Imperial Britain extracted 45 trillion dollars from India. The rarely talked about late Victorian holocausts. Planned obsolescence and overproduction, mass goods thrown away in landfills. Planned economic recessions to destroy worker power. How war isn't so bad from the capitalist POV because it helps restore profitability by destroying vast amounts of capital.

If you went through Marx/Engels/Lenin picking out truth bombs we could be here all day even ignoring the technical stuff.

- Products of human labor seem to control us and have a will of their own; socialism is in part a project to reverse this so we're in control. Think of when people talk about "the economy" or "the market" like it's a God that must be sated or else it will punish us.

- It doesn't matter if you replaced all the "greedy rich people" with saints. They're just representations of capital, an amoral social relation. It must seek the greatest return on investment or perish.

- Capitalism trends towards centralization and monopoly.

- The demand for equality is incoherent beyond the abolition of classes.

- People, morality, laws, culture, and other things are products of the economic forces of their time.

- As socialists there's no point in demanding people to be more selfless, or selfish, both are necessary expressions of the human will.

- If you can't get rid of wage labor you won't get rid of capitalism.

- Liberals always yammer on about democracy, but you should always ask: for which class?

This passage from the fictional work Red Plenty is a poetic summary:

"Marx had drawn a nightmare picture of what happened to human life under capitalism, when everything was produced only in order to be exchanged; when true qualities and uses dropped away, and the human power of making and doing itself became only an object to be traded. Then the makers and the things made turned alike into commodities, and the motion of society turned into a kind of zombie dance, a grim cavorting whirl in which objects and people blurred together till the objects were half alive and the people were half dead. Stock-market prices acted back upon the world as if they were independent powers, requiring factories to be opened or closed, real human beings to work or rest, hurry or dawdle; and they, having given the transfusion that made the stock prices come alive, felt their flesh go cold and impersonal on them, mere mechanisms for chunking out the man-hours. Living money and dying humans, metal as tender as skin and skin as hard as metal, taking hands, and dancing round, and round, and round, with no way ever of stopping; the quickened and the deadened, whirling on."



"And what would be the alternative? The consciously arranged alternative? A dance of another nature, Emil presumed. A dance to the music of use, where every step fulfilled some real need, did some tangible good, and no matter how fast the dancers spun, they moved easily, because they moved to a human measure, intelligible to all, chosen by all."

LMAO I knew as soon as I read the OP that the comments would be filled with people gleefully telling them to read books written in the 19th and early 20th century.

There is nothing, absolutely nothing that a Western leftist loves more than making reading lists. It's no wonder leftism is seen as a middle class, elitist subculture by the working class

>>2374255
they literally asked for reading material also what kind of dipshit sheltered ah surburboid thinks none of us workers read LMAO

>>2374437
>>2374255
I will recommend some stuff written after 1990 that is more readable and relevant.


>The Divide- Jason Hickel. Gives a history of how the global North has exploited the South. Readable


Imperialism in the Twenty First Century- John Smith. Excellent and much needed update of marxist theory on imperialism. many people will tell you to read Lenin, but frankly, he is outdated. This is a modern classic.

Hardt and Negri- Multitude. A praxis for a global uprising, not just the proletariat, but all who labour under capitalism.


Unique IPs: 12

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]