/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

central planning means an abolition of exchange in favor of direct distribution; thats the central flaw, since it universalises consumption under the regime of necessity, rather than subjective interest. subjective interests also incur a marginal utility, which gives character to low time-preferential activity like saving. if one cannot save his money, he cannot strive to actualize his desire, so loses ambition for more productive pursuits.

decentralized planning creates markets by a division of labor and capital, necessitating money as a medium of exchange. the benefit of this is that it allows for the private possession of money, which then allows for higher consumption and investment in society.

in centrally-planned economies, there is also no efficient price system, so the supply of goods cannot be properly organized, while in decentralized systems, supply is regulated by consumer demand. money limits its own supply based on these market factors.

>>2375725

>Anarcho-capitalism
I see so bullshit.

>[bullshit]
Let me debunk this for you
>I am a Anarcho-capitalism!
>Hail our monopoly!
>Hail the one big corporation who centrally plans everything!
>It is the will of the market!
And I rest my case!

compooters

>>2375736
ancaps are against monopolies, since they can only rise due to state partnership. why do you think corporations require subsidies if they are so efficient? markets destroy monopolies through competition and free association.

>>2375740
Wrong. Markets consolidate due to general law of accumulation. Free market pre-monopoly capitalism (1600-1880) developed into monopoly capitalism after its apex in 1860s-70s.

Marx and Engels were against central planning btw

>>2375740
retard

you might want to check the cybercommunism general
>>2249875

>>2375761
Prove it faggot. They were against centralized decisionmaking without oversight aka no transparency, not against any sort of "centralized economy". Inb4 barracks communism, btw gorby and other revisionists used the same arguments for pro-market reforms.

>>2375725
Free Markets worked so well in 90s Russia that it convinced the majority of the population that the worst, most inefficient centrally planned economy was better than the best functioning market. Russia has a alot of idle potential that isnt used due to neolibs in power and in position of economic importance (Putin and his clique)

>>2375740

>Monopolies are LE impossible in the le free market
I can not hear you over the sound of the government breaking up monopolies.

>Monopolies magically vanish
Imagine living in an absurd fantasy land.

>The government creates monopolies
Despite it breaking them up…..

>b-b-b- why money from the gov
Because the capitalist wants more money? Do you think they will stop this once all anti-monopoly laws are removed?
>b-b-b-b-
What is your solution make money illegal? Welcome to the real world child.

>>2375725
>>2375740
Fun fact the free market is impossible and never has existed and never will exist.

>>2375725
Here's something that'll blow your mind: There is no such thing as unplanned economies. No, not even small businesses.
> if one cannot save his money, he cannot strive to actualize his desire
Do you Rothbardians realize one can work towards a future without saving? When I'm working out, what exactly am I "saving"? "Saving" is the very opposite of becoming. And this goes for business too.
The difference between "savings" and "earnings" is also questionable in itself. If I generate revenue, and immediately re-invest it, how is this different from the Gosplan doing the same when it came to raw output?

>which then allows for higher consumption and investment in society.
Why? As the Gosplan showed, even when extremely centralized, the level of investment and growth in output can surpass that of "free market" economies.
>in centrally-planned economies, there is also no efficient price system
Leaving aside there being no such thing as "unplanned" economies. What do you mean by an "efficient" price system? If people are unable to afford goods, or lack access to them entirely in the USSR, how is this "less efficient" compared to a homeless person or "working poor" being unable to afford the same goods in the United States?

>>2375717
>The capitalist propaganda is basically nonsense since is not every economy centrally planned? Do the capitalist corporations not have a board of directors who literally decide how many products to produce this year?
Yes. And it becomes especially evident when you work for a huge international company. Come to think of it, Why was South Korea at the height of the Chaebol centralization a "free market" but not the Comecon?

>>2375740
Try work for a huge retailer. You'll quickly realize why they can undercut "Mon and Pops" without subsidies due to economies of scale. And they'd be wiped out almost entirely if not for antitrust laws (like prohibiting retailers from capturing all the market share in a certain area by buying up all the stores, and their smaller local competitors).

>>2375835
>Yes
Can you give me more materials to read on this subject?

Because the spamming of the word ""Centrally planned"" always sounded to me like retarded capitalist propaganda.

>>2375838
I appreciate you taking seriously a un-ironic anarcho-capitalist 🤡
However at some point you need to conclude that these people literally must deny every form of reality.

I am the the
>Ridicule and laugh at
Stage at dealing with ancaps.


>Try work for a huge retailer.
Ancap axiom #1
<Mathematics is a communist lie! (this is literally part of Praxeology!!! 🤡🤡🤡)

Ancap axiom #2
<Money is not real 🤡🤡🤡 and can not be used to calculate everything.

Ancap axiom #3
<Barriers to entry are fake.

Ancap axiom #4
<Economies of scale are not real!

>>2375853
>>2375863
>>2375740

This picture kills the ancap

>>2375725
Deleting the CENTRAL NODE in your "decentralized" diagram will cause the network to shatter into five pieces. That image is a good fit for the intellectual rigor you exhibit in your post :P

You seem to believe the purpose of life is to have good prices, but prices are a means. Prices would of course be less important in a more centralized system, it does not follow from this that they would be bad. And what is the meaning of good and bad here. You seem to think (if your thinking even goes that far, you see I'm being generous here) that the question of price quality is equivalent to how close price proportions are to those of the magical "free" market. But if the prices don't have the same purpose, why should they be. And you have no argument why being able to do marginalist analysis would require a decentralized system, it's just another asinine assertion.

>>2375717
central planning will only work if AI gets sophisticated enough and we also have to hope it doesn't evolve into some super demonic god

>>2376229
>AI

It is incredible how fast someone can debunk themselves if they mention AI and are worshiping it.

Like FTL fast self debunking.

<While yes central planning is only possible if we let a insane robot do it and tell us to smoke cigarettes every day.

>demonic
Mentioning DEMONS Shiggy Diggy

Either way this is a serious question. Who was the first leftists or Marxist writer to talk seriously about Central Planning?

Does this exist outside of CIA propaganda?

<Muh AI will centrally plan
1) Did Marx write about AI and central planning?!

2) if you have no idea WTF central planning is supposed to even be then it can not be implemented and AI and computers will not solve this.

Wikipedia has this insanity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Cybersyn

Outside of being a meaningless 70s SF nonsense I debunk this retardation by being a real worker who works in a bread factory.
Unlike all the NEETs and legal NEETs (academics are legal NEETs).

We make bread there, it comes out of the oven and is cooled and then packed into bags and then boxes. The boxes are send out to customers almost every day (excluding holidays and weekends)

Now WTF would this central planning or AI or the 70SF room help here?

<Information faster information
Of what? One product is directly boxed before getting shipped out it comes out of the assembly line and is packed. You literally can not do it faster because hot bread and bags or boxes are a bad idea.

BECAUSE PHYSICS AND REALITY!
And the bread can not cool faster because of PHYSICS.

<herp derp how do we know what to produce and how much, muh problems of central planning and my fedora!
This is very simple Jabba the ancap/liberterian we do it based on what the customers say. The customers are other firms so stores and restaurants etc.

<b-b-b-b- how do they know
Based on observation? I mean I never worked in a consumer facing establishment however I can literally predict that it is based on historical data +/- predictions

<b-b-b-b- where does the historic data come from? Check mate atheists!
It is a record of how much of the food was sold and taken this is it. This is how simple it is. The blind prediction is literally
<Hmm I think this year we will have more customers because we host the Olympics
or
<hmmm COVID happened I predict we sell less cars so lets build less cars this year!
And this REAL prediction your corporate gods did make failed and turned out to be wrong.

I seriously have no idea WTF liberterians/ancaps are raving all about or if they are schizo or never left their mothers basement. Same for the central planning fanboys.

How the fuck is a computer room that sends you all the data of …. ???? What exactly? How many breads we did sell? That shit is so trivial you can write it on paper. And what will happen faster or better here? We can not make bread faster (and for cars it is on another level of impossible). We often use bread that is in reserve and also shit happens and the bread gets fucked up so producing more is a good idea to have a safe buffer for incidents.

Any improvements are based on technology improving and we already use the Science Fiction technology of a 1950s TELEPHONE to get the requests at the speed of LIGHT over phone lines!

However even if telephones did not exist this would change very little for us (maybe the customers would flip out since they can not call last minute to change their orders, a very cancerous behavior) and the delivery driver would simply pick up the list of their next order for tomorrow when he delivers the product for today. A little tabulation in the office and we get our orders for tomorrow.

If central planning is a thing in this way then there is
"Physical paper card request planning"
That was replaced by
"Phone call request planning"
This is simply technology that changes not planning.

Bonus for libertarians
<How can you know how much you produce (or other retardation)
lets concentrate on the most common bread type (there are others) 8 bread balls into 1 bag and for this product 3 bags into a box (there are like 3 types of boxes however this is the most common one and lets keep it simple)

If you can not figure this one out I help you it is 8 * 3 = ???
If you can not figure this out you should be publicly beaten and shamed for your retardation and not lecture others how abandoning capitalism is impossible because 8 * 3 = ??? is beyond your brains capacity.

<Yes however how can you figure out how much of the flour and other ingredient to order? Checkmate atheists!

While I am sure the boss hides this information it is as simple as knowing how many of a given ingredient is thrown into one mixer unit (no idea how they are named) SO lets say
one mixer unit gives a total of 1450 bread balls A (lets call it that the product codes we use are insane)
It is filled with 55 KG of flour
10 liters of water
12 liters of egg yoke
(lets keep it simple)

Now how many KG of flour how many Liters of water and how many liters of egg yoke do you need if you want to produce 50000 bread balls of type A?

If you do not know how to solve this or can not even imagine how this is calculated then your libertarian NEET money needs to be canceled(government money and/or inheritance you got) and you need to be forced to work in the coal mines until you drop dead since this is the only benefit to society that you can be.

For everyone else the calculations are simple and I do not understand why one guy (or WTF are you even arguing for) is supposed to calculate it instead the people in the firm like it is now.

I am sure that if someone analyzed every step of the production and distribution maybe some strangeness would show up like
>Why do you pack 8 into a bag if 4 lets you fill up more efficiently? And you can have better subdivisions and fill up the box better and put more bread into one?

However there is most often a simple answer
<The machine packs 8 and there is no changing that
And buying a new machine costs billions or putting more machines requires more space and this requires getting a bigger factory building

etc etc. My estimation is that most of the in firm behavior is 100% efficient and needs no improvements the only thing that can improve is removing crap like planned obsolescence and DRM that is a real thing however these things exist to benefit a specific firm.

There literally is no reason for the cable in a iphone to literally do cryptographic checks with the cables microprocessor and be calibrated to work with 1 cable with 1 specific serial number or it bricks itself. However it makes apple more money by fucking over anyone who wants to repair parts of their iphone.

Same for (hypothetically) factory machines who have a suicide chip who counts the number of operations made and if it hits lets say 99 billion it will kill itself so you need to buy a new machine.

>>2377528
>Who was the first leftists or Marxist writer to talk seriously about Central Planning?
Marx and Engels talked about labor-time accounting:
<…after the abolition of the capitalist mode of production, but still retaining social production, the determination of value continues to prevail in the sense that the regulation of labour-time and the distribution of social labour among the various production groups, ultimately the book-keeping encompassing all this, become more essential than ever.
-Marx, Capital Volume III https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1894-c3/ch49.htm

<From the moment when society enters into possession of the means of production and uses them in direct association for production, the labour of each individual, however varied its specifically useful character may be, becomes at the start and directly social labour. The quantity of social labour contained in a product need not then be established in a roundabout way; daily experience shows in a direct way how much of it is required on the average. Society can simply calculate how many hours of labour are contained in a steam-engine, a bushel of wheat of the last harvest, or a hundred square yards of cloth of a certain quality. It could therefore never occur to it still to express the quantities of labour put into the products, quantities which it will then know directly and in their absolute amounts, in a third product, in a measure which, besides, is only relative, fluctuating, inadequate, though formerly unavoidable for lack of a better one, rather than express them in their natural, adequate and absolute measure, time.
-Engels, Anti-Dühring

And doing proper labor-time accounting logically entails central planning, otherwise you need a third thing as measure of labor time, "relative, fluctuating, inadequate".

>One product is directly boxed before getting shipped out it comes out of the assembly line and is packed. You literally can not do it faster because hot bread and bags or boxes are a bad idea (…) We can not make bread faster
I'm not a bread expert and rarely eat bread, but isn't bread production much faster today than it used to be; and I don't just mean less labor time here, but less waiting time due to inventions like ovens with different air pressure. Who says we are at the end here. Heating and cooling takes less time if there is more surface to volume. So, perhaps an avenue for speedup is to first use a shape that heats and cools quickly and then reshape after that (with a little help of some Frankenstein chemicals).

I question the generality of insight breadmaking gives you. I work in a huge warehouse and I can see that computers and computer networks make a huge difference.

>>2375717
Most economies today are centrally planned. The only thing that they do that isn’t planned out is the setting of prices which they look to the market to set those. But all the logistics and essentials of economies of scale is centrally planned.

If you wanna start producing something then there's an office you can go to ask the government to make a factory for it, and they'll figure if it's worth the resources or not.

>>2375853
see: >>2249875