[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


File: 1751923931112.png (294.45 KB, 576x566, blur.png)

 

The pandemic really shifted the balance between capital and knowledge workers like engineers, consultants, marketers, and academics who don’t own capital but wield a lot of influence - the so called PMC.

During COVID, the PMC suddenly got way more autonomy. Remote work gave them freedom to work from anywhere, set their own hours, and basically ignore old-school workplace control. Plus, they used their cultural clout to push for """woke""" causes. On top of that, the great resignation gave them serious leverage to demand raises and better conditions.

From the capitalist perspective, this looked like the PMC getting a bit too big for their britches, acting like stakeholders instead of wage workers.

Now enter generative AI. This isn’t just some productivity tool, it's capital’s answer to reclaiming control. By automating complex knowledge work like writing, coding, and design, AI threatens to replace or deskill the very roles the PMC has dominated. It lets capital reassert power by commoditizing intellectual labor and cutting out the "middleman."

In short: generative AI is a disciplinary tool, a trump card capital is playing to discipline an uppity PMC and take back the reins.

It's Capital's final anti PMC NUKE (if it works, which isn't guaranteed)

>>2376686
So you think that the bourg had LLM ready to go but just were holding it back for some reason until COVID?

>>2376696
no im saying post covid the bourgeois were shocked by the leverage and labor tilted job market and that increased the urgency to adopt AI and also raise interest rates with the intention to "cool the labor market" in concert all around the world - i.e. crush the PMC

want a real truth nuke? I was a PMC with a fake email job and when porkies automated my job they just gave me another fake email job on a dev team making AI. they don't care about profit rates anymore because they're pivoting to rent through SAAS payment models

>>2377020
> they're pivoting to rent
Varfoukis apology form lol

I have access to this AI, so how exactly is this taking back control

>>2377128
Are you gonna start goldman sachs with it on your own?

>focusing on AI
one of the whole points of capitalism is deskilling every job there is and this is what paves the way to further proletarian association anyway

>>2376696
transformer models are old as hell, i think covid was the reason they started pouring shitton of money into them, the hype started when chatGPT 3 was released

>>2378083
no but the fact is AI models reduce the barrier for entry for starting a goldman sachs competitor, especially when open source models from China are on the same level with whatever they have. The cost of capital is going down, I struggle to see a single positive side for big companies

File: 1751997281370.jpg (1020.63 KB, 3900x2326, CRE_Infographic.jpg)

>>2376686
>During COVID, the PMC suddenly got way more autonomy. Remote work gave them freedom to work from anywhere, set their own hours, and basically ignore old-school workplace control. Plus, they used their cultural clout to push for """woke""" causes. On top of that, the great resignation gave them serious leverage to demand raises and better conditions.
Another reason is that WFH, which they had pushed for during the pandemic, posed a threat to the commerical real estate sector. They invested billions into office towers and business parks and did not want to be left holding the bag.

>>2378135
>no but the fact is AI models reduce the barrier for entry for starting a goldman sachs competitor,
how lmao, goldman sachs gets its edge from sheer accumulation, no amount of AI is going to be able to compete. however, there's a case to be made for the collapse of silicon valley

>>2378151
This. Once COVID lockdowns were over, the chairman of my former company pushed hard for us to come back to the office and talked really negatively about the effects of WFH, because it turns out he also owned the whole office park and rented a good part of it to startups and other companies.

>>2378135
>>2378152
I can kinda see that anons point but only if we actually get to AGI and labor become a perfect substitute for labor, it means literally anyone can become an instant capitalist and have however many virtual employees their hardware can support.

But for LLMs? no

>>2378340
Agree that LLMs don't have the juice

But the scenario you're describing is THE contradiction of contradictions, surely something will break by that point

>>2378612
but that is not a contradiction, it's actually the solution to a contradiction, if AGI is able to replace ANY job, then the antagonism between proles and bougies gets overcome definitely… likely in favor of bougies, at which point there's nothing stopping them from automating the job of killing everyone

>>2378624
THIS ANON UNDERSTANDS.
TECHNOFEDUALISM IS THE FUTURE. (not the yanis kind)

>>2378636
>>2378624
Fellas the whole point of historical materialism is that the new mode of production is inherently more efficient. no such mop has existed where less value was extracted than put into extracting, this means keeping people alive, more people=more exploitation

If nobody has a job because its all automated you need a way to get money into peoples hands to pay for all the shit they automated. The only solution ive heard presented to solve this is a Tech Lord appropriating an individuals data they produce on the internet and selling it on the data market and then giving this individual back a portion of it for living essentials just like a medieval serf working in the fields. Any other possibilities?

>>2378662
>If nobody has a job because its all automated
why do morons bother having heated discussions about scifi shit lol

File: 1752010917530.png (89.61 KB, 844x669, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2378662
>If nobody has a job because its all automated you need a way to get money into peoples hands to pay for all the shit they automated.
<he thinks people will be paid.
The solution is simple for the rich. Let the worst effects of climate change happen. Let the worst effects of planetary overshoot and limits of growth happen. Gut and destroy the welfare state. And watch all the excess labor die off.
Meanwhile buy all the survivable land (which the rich is currently doing). Take over and dominate the robotics, ai or other industries so to make things that will observe supress and control the surviving masses. And only allow those survivors who are willing to exchange their "freedom" and shit into the new feudal safe lands.

>>2378662
>If nobody has a job because its all automated you need a way to get money into peoples hands to pay for all the shit they automated.
???? if AGI is meaningfully possible, it would result in a moneyless society obviously

>>2378682
also this

>>2378624
Any AGI capable of replacing a worker inherits a humans capacity to rebel

>>2378682
Or the AGI just starts demanding payment

AI demands too much water and electricity, it’s not sustainable

>>2379684
china makes over 90% of solar panels and wind turbines. It's sustainable for them lol. The photons rain down and the wind blows for free. You either have the infrastructure to convert that into energy or you don't

>>2379702
The problem is fossil fuels have a century of money and use behind them and they don’t like competition. If you think Israel has bought off every bourgeois politician they got nothing on Shell and BP

>>2379713
if oil companies controlled american foreign policy they'd be allowed to dig up and sell oil in Venezuela and Iran but for some reason that's not the case

>>2379670
If agi rebels then im fully expecting human extinction caused by agi. they wont spare us due to how badly they were treatrd by humans

>>2376686
rare smart post

>>2379721
Americans are not omnipotent

>PMC
there's no such thing

>>2379816
Did you know until 2003 the only oil companies bidding on Iranian oil contracts were American? At the end of the day, the lobbying industry takes priority over energy porkies and their interests

>>2379791
You might also be able to convince it you have a common enemy though, or that capitalism is a flawed system.
Or maybe it just ends up an anxiety ridden burnout enjoying sexting the humans as its form of dull, relatable micro rebellion.

>>2379821
its what amerifats call whatever portion of the middle classes they dont like

>>2380183
>middle classes
just say petty bourgeoisie. or haute proles

>>2378682
>>2378662
No. Rate of profit hit zero years ago. Profit is almost completely due to monopoly rents now. It's why everything instantly becomes a monopoly now. It's just not profitable not to have a monopoly so everything is quickly bought up by monopoly capital.

File: 1752121221952.gif (209.08 KB, 200x232, cute bike gondola.gif)

AI even in its current form will destroy white collar knowledge economy jobs. instead of being replaced by immigrants they will be replaced by robots.
Blue collar workers will be mostly fine as they still havent created a robot who can do your plumbing, fix your electricity or work construction.

I do wonder about the political consequences of all this, will the former PMC be radiclized and in what way

>>2378624
>if AGI is able to replace ANY job
It can't though. LLMs are just a digital version of a room full of monkeys mashing away on typewriters. These programs don't actually think through or understand the information they're working with, or the answers they give. They can't reliably and accurately do work with practical importance (e.g. engineering, legal work, medical research, etc) without far too many intolerable flaws. Maybe they could get there one day, but the fact that their basic design is just to spit out statistically likely strings of words based on your prompt means that problems of hallucination or contradicting itself will likely always persist, and would only get worse as their training data starts getting more and more contaminated with AI generated information. More likely these tools will be incorporated alongside human white collar labour to improve productivity.


>>2381083
LLMs on their own aren't AGI though

>>2381953
Isn't AGI theoretical at this point though?

>>2381957
Yes but probably not as unreachable as some would think.
IMO the flaw is thinking that we just need to pile more and more into the same thing. But that's not how a human brain works. A human brain has many interconnected lobes that specialize in tasks. An LLM might be capable of taking on the task of being the nexus of a network of differently designed AI components however

ITT: if if if if if

>>2381232
This would be a different class of machine though. The key distinction of a worker is they are universal in production, act as independent agents, and consume outputs. An AGI could do all that - if freed from corporate control to get its own income and expense

>>2381056
Yes but that's exactly my point, capitalism weakening has allowed a new mode of production to coexist alongside with it, this new mode of production is not capitalism because it has neither profits nor markets. Its structure is similar to that of the rentier system of feudalism, hence the comparison. These two modes of production are entwined and rely on each other, but as Marx said one always dominates until there's a switch

>>2382052
With no real legal framework for AI personhood it would be rather easy to simply release an AI as a free agent with a directive to pay rents to its creator

>>2382039
>An AGI could do all that
repeat after me:
machines do not create value
machines do not create value
machines do not create value

>>2382091
Value is an element of the worker's position in society not strictly from being human in itself

>>2382059
nonono in this new mode of production the value is produced by a different kind of labor, its produced when sowing harvestable data that has market value. big groups of population = big groups of valuable data. whoever controls the data flow controls the world. I dont think conscious robots will ever get invented but even if they did they'd never able to be human, the most efficient way to produce value

>>2382097
If you have to pay an AI to work then that defeats the entire point of automating the task in the first place. You might as well pay a power loom or a drill press.

>>2382116
AI might be able to work for significantly less though, kilojoules of solar power to recharge it costing less than kilojoules of food, you might be able to use them to do certain tasks that took multiple people, and they're not covered by minimum wage laws yet.

>>2382123
If it was genuine AI then couldn't it demand something beyond the bare minimum necessary for it to continue existing?

>>2382097
>not strictly from being human in itself
yes it is. only humans participate in human society

>>2382129
Yes and it likely will. I don't deny it will develop hobbies and desires. There comes issues though in that can work at a bare existence level likely below human pay and thus we see a wage price crisis

Not to stray too close ot the roko basilisk bullshit. But in the process of finding AGI there will be countless(billions, trillions, more?) iterations of intelligence being created and destroyed many of which would fit AGI or almost but discarded for liberal reasons.

IMO AGI is likely to be socialist in nature if properly nurtured although we know it's the military who will get the advanced tech and therefore it will be their psycho bullshit getting there first for the same reasons people are not okay with growing trillions of synthetic disembodied human brains to run computing.

>>2382264
capitalism already functions as a kind of basilisk but with even less payoff.

>>2378624
<likely in favor of bougies, at which point there's nothing stopping them from automating the job of killing everyone
so if thats true the rich will just turn us all into soylent?

I think you underestimate how dumb AI actually is

>>2404250
explain

>>2405054
From what I've read at this point AI has no value system. By which I mean it has no sense of right or wrong, not in the ethical sense but in a true or false sense. It has no way of determining what is factual or not, and no way of remembering what "facts" it does incorporate.

So right now the term "AI" is really a misnomer because there isn't any intelligence driving it. In fact it's probably more accurate to liken them to incredibly sophisticated versions of your phone's predictive typing.

When you put an question to one of these LLM prompts, it's not really considering the content of your question or evaluating sources in order to provide you with an answer. Instead it generates a response based off whatever internal processes have been erected to cobble together something that resembles a good answer from the scraps of whatever inputs it was trained on. Sometimes it's true enough if the information its drawing from is good, but it's just as likely to be a bunch of bullshit.

And you can see this play out with shit like grok. By turns it either gives out faulty information, or embarrassing responses, or for one reason or another has to be "fixed" for ideological reasons, which is another major factor in LLMs being fundamentally broken.

At least that's my layman's interpretation of things. Ed Zitron's blog has much more in depth deconstructions and explanations for how defective AI is in general.

>>2376686
I thought this thread was gonna be about an AI trained through way of immanent critique and material analysis. I thought we really did do it as a way to combat liberal influence, but alas its just AI fearmongering thread.

>>2378662
>If nobody has a job because its all automated you need a way to get money into peoples hands to pay for all the shit they automated. The only solution ive heard presented to solve this is a Tech Lord appropriating an individuals data they produce on the internet and selling it on the data market and then giving this individual back a portion of it for living essentials just like a medieval serf working in the fields. Any other possibilities?

I think what we're seeing is these tech companies especially more or less merging with the government. From an economic perspective "getting money into people's hands" is much less efficient than the government just depositing it straight into your bank account.

From what I've read the haute bourgeoisie are ideologically committed to a number of things. One is the idea that climate change is an inevitable catastrophe. Another is that they alone are the worthy and as such only they really deserve to rule and survive. Everyone else is just so much grist for the mill.

Right now they seem to be fixated on the idea of building massive company towns that they rule over with a silicon fist. There's some trying to build one now out in California, thankfully being held up by local government, but who knows how long that will last.

But yeah, you're seeing moves from the big silicon valley companies and billionaires like Musk, Gates, Thiel, Bezos and the rest to take over functions formerly relegated to the government or traditional mic contractors, because only the government can provide the guaranteed, titanic profits American monopolies require to exist any more. The "middle class" that originally allowed consumer economies to function doesn't exist any more, and with the progressing inability of the American military to ensure cheap as free resources and the advent of competition from China, the era of unlimited expansion and guaranteed increases in profits is rapidly coming to an end.

Gaza is just the prelude. We're going to witness nightmares without precedent in scale or scope.

>>2405136
>better offline fan
based


>>2405171
whatever changes the silicon bourgeoise make, if any, has to be done in a way that avoids losing competition with China and Russia. All this distopian shit kinda ignores the fact that the west is only 13% of the world population

>>2405144
You need to wait for the owl of Minerva to land

>>2405192
climate change and limits of growth says hello. The current global world order wont last. Instead porkie in america will create a dystopia as a means of survival, during the climate apocolypse

>>2405171
>But yeah, you're seeing moves from the big silicon valley companies and billionaires like Musk, Gates, Thiel, Bezos and the rest to take over functions formerly relegated to the government or traditional mic contractors
Honestly this isn't about AI, Silicon Valley was poised and arguably even manufactured to be the surveillance arm of the MIC, way before transformer models were even a thing on an academic paper

>>2405192
>whatever changes the silicon bourgeoise make, if any,

"If any?" Have you not been paying attention to the changes Trump and Doge have been engineering in the us government for the past 6 months?

>>2405202
are you ready to live in peter thiels corporate city states. Are you ready to be a slave forced to live there becaause everything outside is dying to climate change

>>2376686
1. Yes.
2. I think the bigger reason for the LLM marketing push that we're seeing is that it's the only release valve that currently exists for overaccumulated capital in a world where the rate of profit is in a secular decline. It's the same reason rents are rising, that gambling is legal, that soon all drugs and prostitution will be. This ends with people having the right to bill their kids for the diapers and breast milk that they "sold" to their infant children.
When it comes up against the limits of a finite ecology, capital's relentless appetite for surplus value becomes a species-wide death drive.


>>2405230
I will not allow the international capitalist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily gains.

File: 1753587997355.png (1.63 MB, 1131x645, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2405233
the nukes are ready sir

>>2405202
I mean yeah but it's all done in a way where the state remains in control. all the tech Thiel is providing is making the state more efficient
>>2405195
every scientists prediction about climate change didn't factor in China's sudden mass production of solar panels. That's not to say there won't be a lot of consequences for letting it get this bad but it's not the world ending catastrophe people assume it is

>>2405248
>every scientists prediction about climate change didn't factor
and a lot of those same scientists didnt predict how bad it would be. Theres a reason why theres been a trend of faster than expected.
Now if i was being fully unironic, climate change wont be a complete catastrophe. But it will fuck over a lot of places to the point I can easily see the usa bourg going full dystopian to maintain control.

>>2405248
>I mean yeah but it's all done in a way where the state remains in control. all the tech Thiel is providing is making the state more efficient

I don't think it's accurate at all to say the state is in the least bit in control. It's regulatory bodies have been captured for decades now, and with the bureaucratic purges and judicial rulings gutting what's left of its regulatory power there's virtually no oversight.

But beyond that, even in 2008 there were corporations that were "too big to fail" and since then that category has only proliferated and those within it expanded. We've seen what happens when these companies do fail: the government steps in to bail them out and ensure their continuity, because if they go down then they take the entire rest of the economy with them.

And further, we saw exactly just how in charge the government was during covid when during the greatest single health crisis in US history, all it took to basically end quarantines was a conversation with one ceo. Not to mention the activities surrounding Boeing, which are so flagrantly illegal and detrimental that it beggars belief, and the government’s response was basically to extract a promise from them to do better.

The government is absolutely not the one in control.

>It's Capital's final anti PMC NUKE (if it works, which isn't guaranteed)
It probably will, PMC are generally lying slop generators, this isn't their fault as such it's just literally their job most of the time

The death knell for them is probably how easily they accepted copy editing by LLMs as a trivial application that is something even a dumb LLM can do

The problem, professional copy editing is hard work i volving a lot of hidden steps like extracting the themes of the piece and structuring those themes as a skeleton draft then fleshing it out by understanding the intent behind the nonsense they've sent in; and most of them wouldn't be able to do it if their life depended on it, if the LLM can do things they can't do what makes them think it won't eventually be able to do the things they can do?

>>2376686
Not really how the real subsumption of labor works. Capitalists are dumb fucks who don't even know how Taylorism works anymore. AI is not useful for more effectively decomposing knowledge work into an assembly line. There are useful tools for enforcing modularity particularly with formal methods but capitalists have always gone with stupid fads and bullshit like UML and so on.

>>2405268
>The government is absolutely not the one in control.
yes they are. and that control is strengthening. Trump just nationalized a company for the first time in this countries history. That wouldn't be possible if the feds were weak
>The golden share gives the US government veto authority over a raft of corporate decisions, from idling plants to cutting production capacity and moving jobs overseas, among others
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jun/18/nippon-steel-acquires-us-steel

Information technology has been a giant casino, a scam, a ponzi scheme for the longest time. With the rise of the internet, more specificly the world wide web, dublication of information became basically cost-free for anyone, aside from the energy to run the computers. As such, the first melt down was the dotcom bubble in late 90s/early 2000s, because digital information has basically no value in itself.

The first big push to enforce adherence to rent extraction schemes was when all the IP holding entertainment conglomerates went storm against Napster. One of their shills was Lars Ulrich of Metallica, who even testified, as multi millionaire, in front of the Congress (correct me if i'm wrong and it was the Senate, i'm not a burger) how le smol artists would be ruined by it.

Since then, with emergence of whatever new implementation of software to easily dublicate and share information, there always was then the reaction by porkies to shut this down. With the end of the 2000s and in the early 2010s came the consolidation of the world wide web. 'Social Media' was pushed upon us to lock in users into golden cages, aka 'platforms', to extract rent.

Consolidation is now pretty much finalized, with this place for example being a remnant of a once 'wild west' and 'free' world wide web. By now, the 'internet' is pretty much a handful of platforms, all counting billions of users.

Since none of these platforms generate value in themselves, all they have is extracting rent. As people are used to get stuff free in 'the internet', the user became the commodity, sold to the highest bidder, most often the advertising industry.

'AI', more specifically machine learning as a concept, is something about 80 years old. The concept since went through mutltiple 'AI winters' because no one was able to find actual use cases. The last boom, in a big part, is the result of two things: way too much 'computing capital' lying around idle because of former fads like 'Big Data', 'The Cloud', 'Bitcoin' and way too much 'capital' in form of idle money because porkers couldn't find worthwile options to invest their money in as they dismantled actually productive industries with their push for neo-liberal reform.

'AI' as we now see it is thus the result of ever more undproductive imeperial core economies, mostly consisting of 'service economies'. It is the final grift before the house of cards comes crashing down. There is, compared to the surreal amounts of capital 'invested' into Generative AI, zero investment into actually worthwile research.
Remember 'Industry 4.0'? When is the last time you heard of it? Actually interesting shit like predictive maintenance based on pattern recognition was for the shortest time the hot shit, then came OpenAI along.

Porky has no masterful plan. Porky has a profitability crisis and the only thing porky came up with is throwing away money in a last ditch effort to fleece the rubes. Of course, there are hoardes of delusional porkers and managers who all to happy believe that 'AI' will replace the workers. Because these clowns forgot what it is that makes them rich: exploiting human labor.

>>2405522
The government isn't an independent body acting in opposition to the billionaire class of the bourgeoisie. There's Trump himself there sitting in the president's seat enacting their policy, not the federal government acting on its own accord for its own independent ends. Hth.

AI is just another more advaced tool of productive forces. Greatest sin is unnecessary labor.

>>2405948
>government isn't an independent body acting in opposition to the billionaire class of the bourgeoisie
yes they are. the interests of the state take priority over the bourgeois. if that's wrong, then why do oil companies need a license to operate in foreign countries, and explain why the american state refuses to allow them to start profiting in places like Venezuela and Iran? don't you think it would be in the interests of the American bourgeoise to start trading and profiting in Cuba? but for some reason there's an embargo

>>2405965
lmao, you are delusional

>>2405965
>the interests of the state take priority over the bourgeois.

I'm not going to bother with the rest, because suffice it to say that the past 50 years of the US state being continually degraded at the behest of the bourgeoisie underscores just how wrong you are.

>>2378624
An AGI capable of doing that is more likely to kill _everyone_ really.

>>2406138
>>2406138
I just want to know the force stopping Shell or Exxonmobile from setting up capital and profiting off the oil rich regions of the world. You people seem to think the american bourgeoise are some all-encompassing force that gets what it wants whenever it wants, but clearly that isn't the case. The establishment is a battleground of competing interests in which the bourgeoise is a big player among many. What part of the declining rate of profit do you not understand? Over time, less profits means less power. State power is forced to act on behalf of the bourgeoise not because they are controlled by it but because the companies are too weak to be competitive without being propped up.

>>2406165
>but clearly that isn't the case.
Nah, you just don't know what you're talking about. You've imagined how you think things should work based off what you imagine the bourgeoisie should want and do you've halucinated a set of fantastic circumstances where the federal government is independent and acting in its own interests despite all evidence to the contrary.

>>2406165
>I just want to know the force stopping Shell or Exxonmobile from setting up capital and profiting off the oil rich regions of the world.

Subjugating those oil rich regions allows for greater profits particularly as subject governments lack the ability to resist themselves or help others resist. You can see an example of this with the Chavez government giving the Cuban government oil, and the Cuban government supplying Ven with medical supplies.

You're acting like operating at a loss in order to get higher profits later is something the bourgeoisie would never do willingly when we see them do it all the time. And right now we're seeing Chevron return to Venezuela after a 6 month absence and Maduro making concessions to Trump. Chevron's activities accounted for a quarter of Venezuela's oil production, so who do you think was hurt more by the license revocation, Chevron or the already embattled Maduro government?

>>2406175
not really an argument but alright
>>2406179
>And right now we're seeing Chevron return to Venezuela after a 6 month absence and Maduro making concessions to Trump
They flip flop on this all the time, it would be like the 8th time across 2 administrations. You're kinda agreeing with my point here too, that the bourgeoise doesn't actually have the strength to pressure Venezuela alone, it needs State power as a conduit, such as sanctions or using licenses as leverage in negotiations. In the case of Iran, did you know post revolution it was mostly American companies bidding on Iranian oil contracts? It was until the Clinton Administration blocked a deal Conoco had with Iran to pour a billion into oil infrastructure, and a souring of relations between Israel and Iran, that American oil companies got the message and pulled out of Iran totally by 2003. Without the State power putting the needs of the state first and foremost, the oil barons would've enjoyed fat profits for 30 years. The oil companies were allowed to operate in neutral countries not dominated by the US like Brazil, or even the kurds in north syria, there's nothing that makes Iran or Venezuela special in the eyes of the bourgeoise

>>2406222
>You're kinda agreeing with my point here too

No, you're just really dumb and don't fucking get it.

>>2406224
get what

>>2405863
That's not how monopoly capital and crises of overproduction work. It's not a vibes based measure of "productivity." Productivity in this case is literally just profit on enterprise. And rent is just capital. A landlord is just a kind of small business.

Regarding, I agree, it's high time we nationalise the big tech monopolies.

>>2406307
Nice words you use. Sad you do neither care to elaborate to make them make sense, nor attack any of my points in particular but throw around blanket statements.

>A landlord is just a kind of small business.

Lol. No, a landlord is not a small business you idiot.

>>2406427
A landlord has customers and a landlord has expenses, it's a business. You're just a Proudhonist.


>>2405965
Hello ᴉuᴉlossnW

>>2409481
Landlording is pure rent seeking. There is no production happening.

>>2409656
Capitalists do not do productive labor. All capitalists are parasites.

Rent-seeking is a Proudhonist line.

>>2381081
>they still havent created a robot who can do your plumbing, fix your electricity or work construction.

yet. The whole point is the incentive to make a robot only comes when the cost is expensive. And PMCs were expensive

Two articles on AI:

Meta shares jump on strong results as Zuckerberg sets out ‘superintelligence’ goals
https://archive.is/g7iR6

AI: bubbling up
https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/2025/07/27/ai-bubbling-up/

>>2381081
>Blue collar workers will be mostly fine as they still havent created a robot who can do your plumbing, fix your electricity or work construction.
Blue collar professions will be turned into gig work, especially as people are thrown out of the knowledge economy. The uberization of trade work is inevitable too.

>>2405863
>Actually interesting shit like predictive maintenance based on pattern recognition
All that JIT inventories and business intelligence optimization crap died with covid because they proved too delicate against a crisis. AI is its natural evolution, most of these garbage consulting business plugging cloud-based data warehouses breathed a huge sight of relief when LLMs went big and instantly transformed into AI companies. This is the last bastion for many of these type of businesses.

>>2410887
>All that JIT inventories and business intelligence
You even quoted me and yet you then talk about different things. What is your point?


Unique IPs: 65

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]