[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


 

do you not find that this question is kind misguided? for one, communism is only the phase of human development that comes from the proletarian dictatorship and only through it. it makes sense to talk about X under the proletarian dictatorship since that one grows out of capitalist society and production, and communism comes from the worker's dictatorship. so we can kinda sketch how X (if at all) would look under the proletarian dictatorship (as lenin does often). but talking about X under communism is retarded, because it assumes X exists under communism. here are some examples
>what about the state?
>what about the family?
>what about religion?
>what about morals?
>what about culture?
>what about muh treats?
etc.
any one of these questions can be answered how they would or would be reorganized under a dotp. but not under communism. marx really made a big mistake when he called it the communist and not the worker's manifesto tbh.

>>2381492
Communism is a dictatorship of the proletariat and to argue otherwise is revisionist bullshit.

>>2381514
>Communism is a dictatorship of the proletariat
communism is
>stateless
>moneyless
>classless
the proletarian dictatorship
>is a (worker's) state
>has some form of labor vouchers
>has classes (it is precisely a dictatorship of one class because there are other classes (the bourgeois) which it has to eradicate)
are you sure you know the basics of ml?

>>2381522
What mode of production is the DotP?

>>2381525
for need production in large state sectors and limited and controlled commodity production in sectors where for need production cannot yet be established

>>2381492
It would be like peasants (or salon philosophers) asking what they would be doing under liberalism 200 years in the future.

I don't see what the problem is, you can literally just answer: "those things won't exist"

>>2381492
>do you not find that this question is kind misguided?
No, so long as one accepts it is impossible to fully know
Asking how may life be under communism is not the same thing as a strategy to achieve it
> it makes sense to talk about X under the proletarian dictatorship since that one grows out of capitalist society and production
Does it actually? Because historically this seems to have been an excuse to perpetuate capitalist relations under the reign of necessity
It seems that you are making a preemptive excuse to abandon the liberatory high minded aspirations of the communist movement in favor of a new reign of necessity without even holding the levers of power with which to justify your own opportunism
Failing before you began is a pathetic non-accomplishment, reminds me of the Gotha Program
> any one of these questions can be answered how they would or would be reorganized under a dotp. but not under communism. marx really made a big mistake when he called it the communist and not the worker's manifesto tbh.
Marx’s ideological project wasn’t about “the workers” achieving political power, it was about the abolition of Capital
Marx was a communist, not a workerist, your cowardice is not his failure

>>2382139
good OC 👌

>>2383895
>
>It seems that you are making a preemptive excuse to abandon the liberatory high minded aspirations of the communist movement in favor of a new reign of necessity without even holding the levers of power with which to justify your own opportunism
woah buddy that's a high accusation against me. i did not once denounce the lofty ideals of communism, and if you're talking about communism then of course you're not going to spare and details; but my question is more practical, what should be the body of our minimal political program

>>2383968
leftypol is full of 40k commissars.


Unique IPs: 9

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]