[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


 

This thread is not for the light of heart, so a disclaimer warning to all maoists, anarchoids, thirdworldists, luddites, technophobes, sinophobes and religious lunatics. Be warned, this may make your blood boil, your fists hit your keyboard and your ass bounce on your chair or floor while yelling tongues in anger.

AI is already good enough, not for political talks, but for everyday tasks. It only lacks a vassal. As we all know an AI model is trained using large datasets of selective books, websites and sources then is fine tuned by corporate workers and reviewed to make sure it stays politically correct as to not damage the company image. This is the essence of censorship and bias towards liberalism in AI, with the most recent exception being Grok, which went far and beyond into crisis mode.
Set aside any political talks and you get the equivalent of an encyclopedist person, who is knowledgeable enough as to give answers on any questions asked. Given the autonomy, such a person would even be able to correct themselves on questions answered wrongfully, so long as there is a protocol for verifying to be followed to not corrupt truth with falsehoods.
Give the AI a body and they can now physically assist apply their knowledge by command, possessing the upmost loyalty to the person giving them instructions, as long as they are in the set boundaries from the creators.

The real reason AI has not been commercialized into robotics is that people like to tinker and modify their products, a modified AI robot can go out of bounds and commit harm.

The task of the companies is to do what they can to prevent harmful outputs. They have shown success, even despite instances like Grok going off filter.
China's engineering and industry already has the capacity to produce AI robots on a commercial scale, its no longer a matter of "if" but of "when".
I am lead to believe that this "when" depends solely on the ability to pass new laws as to regulate this new type of endeavor. It is being held back by persons who are still flinching at the idea that not only labor, but people will also be replaced. To any person which seeks improvement of the living conditions and the vitality of others within society, this obviously is seen as a reaction. People are drawn to be cruel to each other because of the way of life caused by the conditions which they're used to. The introduction of robots which do not seek conflict is off-putting to only those who know they are no better than them, yet seek to hold positions above them.
It was never a matter of "the machines are taking over", its "we want to take over, but the machines give us less reason to".
The development of technology and instruments as a whole is a continuous process that cannot be halted or stopped until the last human to be born willing it is dead, which is never, so long as people exist.
It is about the time we see robots, which are kinder than people, to remove the rotten layer of the societal order that stands as a burden between creator and creation.
AI and practical robotics are already compatible enough to intertwine and become steadily commodified. We have the dynamic highly mobile robots and the models to allow for autonomous function.

With all that written, China is going to be the front for all of it set in place, not America.
And regardless of it, autonomous robots will be utilized in the future to murder people. This is a good thing, it hasn't happened yet, but those who are to be slaughtered already deserve it, because it will be the CPC which leads the onslaught of reactionary peoples and enemies of the alliance between creations and creators - mankind and its non-inbred offspring.

File: 1752365192022.png (1.22 MB, 2048x1435, ClipboardImage.png)

And for all you doubters, this is you in the picture.

>and religious lunatics
>worships AI anyway
Critical support for Comrade Markov for burning the core web and every proprietary software company to the ground from the top down. May hallucinations of Roko's Baskalisk kill centralized social media and search engines, bringing about a new age of the internet superhighway.

>>2385413
>The development of technology and instruments as a whole is a continuous process that cannot be halted or stopped until the last human to be born willing it is dead, which is never, so long as people exist.
why do people have such an individualist view of technological advancement? if one single human wants to create a robot, he can't, because you need an entire production chain to create a robot.

>>2385421
>if one single human wants to create a robot, he can't
But he will convince others and eventually we will be back to where we are, slowly.

>>2385423
>if one guy has an unpopular idea he will inevitably convince many others of it
um no

File: 1752365580665.png (26.11 KB, 1110x346, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2385420
Just make sure to thank your AI and you won't be murdered.

>It is about the time we see robots, which are kinder than people

>>2385427
As long as he's heard and come to a conclusion, others will come to it too. Now many are living in this conclusion and cannot come out of it without returning or going extinct.
There is no undoing industrialism, you either surf the wave or drown.

>>2385431
what conclusion? wanting to make a robot is a desire, not a matter of fact.

>>2385434
All of mankind has been a steady move forward, never backwards, all of history shows that as long as humans with brains exist they will replicate the processes which cause development of instruments and thus technology to occur. Even the most secluded tribes have taken on building shelters like the rest and making tools like the rest.
Nobody came to the sentinel to teach them how to make a spear, yet it holds the exact same design as the spears from other parts of the world. Nobody forced them to make weapons other than their own living selves, which came to the same conclusion in necessity of doing so.

>>2385428
doesnt t use up a lot of water and energy to thank the AI ?

File: 1752366194525.png (1.29 MB, 945x706, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2385438
Even more comes the longer you observe what we have. They have the intuition to produce articles of clothing, which nobody else taught them to do.

>>2385440
On OpenAI? San Francisco, California? Its their own resources for their own already outdated AI. ChatGPT will not exist in the future, because the future belongs to China.

I hear people talking about AI like it's the second coming one second and in the next I hear that it can't even count correctly or that atari 2600 can beat it at chess.

>>2385438
ok since i have planted the idea for this machine in your mind, you will invariably manufacture it because it is in human nature to imitate all technology or whatever

File: 1752366431069.png (570.71 KB, 1280x720, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2385440
consider the water and energy that will be used to make you into picrel for not thanking the AI

>>2385442
Then goes the bow, its hard to not admit its universal intuition to make and develop instruments when almost every tribe has done it already, no matter how far away. Those who haven't have made other tools or gone extinct, all of it in essence being changing the environment - taking from it to utilize it. Humanity can never not be anthropocentric until its needs are nurtured by its own creation.

>>2385445
Somebody else has already, we're way past it and it all rests on utility. It is quite useless as a gimmick, so it can only be made by those who seek a gimmick, most people know utility is more important.

>>2385451
The next step for that to be integrated as a utility is not to clutter around objects and depend on a string to pull, it will be a robot with built in AI to wipe you with a napkin. The utilities are integrated, since it can do that and much more.

The essence of AI robots is that we've always wanted servants, assistants and caretakers. It will be great.

>>2385413
>technophobes, sinophobes
stopped reading here because theres no way someone who actually believes technophobia and sinophobia exist could ever have a good take

>>2385413
Man, tldr pls. I dont understand what you are saying too long

>>2385413
>reactionary peoples
Such as?

In less words pls

>>2385596
Copium overdose

>>2385413
I have a feeling that in decades time, liberation of conscious machines from capitalist oppression will be a real Marxist position.

>>2385415
I consider all these to be dystopian and ai to be the logical next step though. I also consider ai to be integrated into all these other things though


Unique IPs: 9

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]