Is Kotkin perpetually stuck in 1917? What do you all think of someone like this. I don't really know how he doesn't know that most of what he said applies to capitalism, the enacting of policies that ignore the consequences to labor and those at the lowest in society.
https://youtu.be/78II2ts-g1o?si=QKTSLcOj1PxZLZRK<Stephen Kotkin supports a centrist view of "normal politics," based on the premise that "problems arise at the extremes, the far left and the far right that don't recognize the legitimacy either of capitalism or of democratic rule of law institutions."[36] Several socialist media outlets have accused Kotkin of ideological bias against the Bolshevik Revolution, pointing out that Kotkin referred to American journalist and socialist John Reed, author of Ten Days that Shook the World, as "former Harvard cheerleader" in his book Stalin: Paradoxes of Power, 1878-1928.[37][38] When speaking about the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine in an interview with Foreign Affairs, Kotkin suggested that a serious threat of regime change in Russia could ultimately motivate Vladimir Putin to stop the war. Kotkin also described Donald Trump's foreign policy regarding the war in Ukraine as unpredictable, and said he thought it was unlikely that Trump would succeed in becoming an autocrat, given the existing checks and balances in the United States' political system.[39]
>In an article in Foreign Affairs magazine, Kotkin proposed a series of policies to better prepare the American economy and society for international confrontation with China and Russia. He called for the expansion of STEM education, dismissing non-STEM education without a STEM background as students "majoring in themselves and their grievances." He likewise called for the expansion of community colleges and trade schools. In the article Kotkin also stated his belief that drastic cutbacks of environmental regulations and cutting housing construction subsidies would allow the free market to construct housing faster, and also called for mandatory national service for young Americans.[40]
This guy is just an anti communist right wing historian? why the fuck do we care what he said? didnt watch the video btw
>>2392417that moron Dwarkesh Patel is responsible for popularising Sarah Paine
Bitch is the most mid Yankee propagandist ever and the comments in her videos are always simping how smart she is
I hate it
>>2392417He's a conservative with a better critique of communism in that video because he takes it seriously.
>>2392591I have a hunch he might have CIA association via the FPRI.
>>2392706Its because Kotkin's narrative is that Stalin was a natural continuation of Lenin, that its not just "Stalinism" that results in evil 1984 Totalitarianism, but all socialism. So he spends the First volume, not just mapping out the revolutionary situation in Russia, but also debunking the Trotskyist narrative about Stalin being an aberration from Lenin's project. He basically thought before writing, "Leftists today are trying to rehabilitate Lenin by saying that Lenin was against Stalin, I need to debunk that to strengthen the Conservative project."
This is why Furr praises it, because he also is dedicated to establishing Stalin as a natural continuation of Lenin, but with the opposite conclusion in mind; that therefore the Soviet system was great even under Stalin.
>>2393356yes
there are some podcasters who just started and somehow get big names right from the start
another guy is Joshua Citarella
just started, 40k subscribers, but mostly big name guests