[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


File: 1752782258238.jpg (10.55 KB, 275x183, zoosafari.jpg)

 

Would zoos, safari parks and circuses be allowed to exist, or as animal rights activists say, there would have to be a total separation of humans and animals in animal care and only sanctuaries would be allowed to exist?

Zoos, safari parks and circuses are capitalist degeneracy but so is the total separation of humans and nature. Refuges and parks monitored by the state or universities that humans can visit or live in with strict rules already exist.

>>2392961
For example which one refuges and parks?

The animals will own the zoo they are the workers

>>2392971
I read that during the communist countries zoos and circuses existed, is it odd or not?

bump

>>2392961
>Refuges and parks monitored by the state or universities that humans can visit or live in with strict rules already exist.
Yeah those are called zoos, dumbass.

>>2393008
Ahahaha, yes exactly!!!

>>2392953
Why wouldn't you have a zoo? The only thing that makes a zoo exhibit good or bad is how well the life is for the animal within that exhibit so that highly depends on the animal. Some animals need to be in very large enclosures to live a good life, some of them are perfectly fine being in a small little habitat. I don't think the reptiles and fish and shit really mind at all. Also zoos help with conservation efforts.

https://www.mysanantonio.com/lifestyle/article/natural-bridge-wildlife-ranch-white-rhino-19959121.php
https://dallasinnovates.com/edge-of-extinction-pioneering-texas-biotech-colossal-and-biorescue-race-to-save-the-northern-white-rhino-species/

>>2392953
why d oyou keep asking this, go eat kremowka or whatever you call it

File: 1752784723483-0.png (243.46 KB, 500x350, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1752784723483-1.png (805.81 KB, 611x840, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1752784723483-2.png (607.85 KB, 674x486, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2392975
Communism has nothing to do with animal rights.

somebody post the rafiq rant on ecology

>>2393024
Elaborate

>>2393041
rights are a bourgeois notion used to defend the existence of private property et al.

File: 1752785681328-0.png (2.32 MB, 1191x1376, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1752785681328-1.png (374.6 KB, 590x350, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2393041
Communism is literally only about the liberation of people. I don't know what there is to elaborate on. I guess another good elaboration would be that animal rights really have nothing to do with human modes of government and human rights in general. You could have a fascist country with better animal rights than a communist one, because the two things are unrelated. In fact, it is a common trope that fascists are big animal lovers, because animals have pure souls or something, while the people they victimize are "subhumans" Ie, Orcs, aka a literal evil biological being that should be eliminated.

>>2393053
I mean logically, a government, a country, a whatever you want to call the social order of people, only exists for the people who are citizens or other members of that country and society. Animals are not part of society. I guess you could make the case that pets and livestock are part of human society, because they have no existence separate from it, but that is not the case for the majority of animals on Earth. Which of the countries that a migrating animal travels through, is he officially a citizen of? It's like a beyond silly question to try and mix ideas about human society with other important issues, but are separate mostly from the concepts about human society is ordered.

>Environmental conservation, animal protection, global warming, blahh blahh


Very important issues that have nothing to do with the difference between capitalism, fascism, communism, etc.

File: 1752786671365.png (661.83 KB, 1280x1116, ClipboardImage.png)

And if you really look at it, the origins of conservation really start with human exploitation, and misanthropy, but I don't want to frame it as these two things must be at odds, but in Europe, the only natural habitats that were ever protected were "the King's Wood" or "Crown Land." It has always been rich people who have led conservation efforts, because they don't need to extract wealth from more land holdings, whereas the people at the bottom always have the materialist interest to extract whatever they can just so they can make a living.

>>2393076
Why can't we talk about it on the mainstream media, instead we are bombarded with misanthropic pro-animal propaganda which is apparently inherently fascist?

Harvest every animal, they are robots made of meat, made for our use and consumption. Every blade of grass will be paved over.

We'll eat all the animals to show our human dominance.

>>2393008
No you ignoramus libtard, zoos are meant to commodify a spectacle, it separates and alienates the consumers and the object of their consumption. Natural parks are meant to preserve an ecosystem where humans and animals can share an interface under strict rules without commodification although ecotourism exists because capitalism on the side.

I think a lot of supposed leftists are just fascists, but whereas the fascist believes in his race as divine and all other humans as scum, the leftist has moved beyond racism to perfect misanthropism.

>communist country
read marx

>>2393113
>>2393125
I don't see animals this way, but I agree environmentalists and animal righters are batshit crazy.

>>2393137
Yes communism is when human supremacists turn the earth into a giant factory with a parking lot on the side and workers can go see the last animals in the circus do tricks on sundays for 5 socialist dollars

>>2393152
Like it or not, this is how life used to look like in Communist countries.

File: 1752789677434.png (1.16 MB, 1170x1410, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2393152
>human supremacists

>>2393154
Well, ideologically it would be ideal to look at the minds of children, not the adults.
Children don't enjoy being beaten, shouted at, made "enjoy the adult activities" or else they are considered "wimpy".
Yeah, the same reason why most women don't enjoy being trafficked.
Children enjoy going to the zoos, circuses, amusement parks, enjoy playing in the playgrounds, playing instruments, some sports (without the grades), being praised, being coddled etc.

File: 1752789838948.png (359.55 KB, 1250x661, ClipboardImage.png)

This is actually a supremely hard ethical and philosophical choice for leftypol.


>>2392953
Why is this even a question you spend your time on?

>>2393149
No, you have to actively despise animals and the environment. The first true oppressor of the working class was nature both her flora and fauna as well as the weather. Communists only have one correct point of view which is yo conquer all of nature and dominate it and subjugate it to the will of the working class.

>>2393159
We don't need circuses grandpa, my toddler loves spending 8 hours a day on an ipad so everyone will be doing that mlw

>>2393170
Ewww….
And that's why this generation is retarded.
BTW I was born in 2000, where in Poland, up till 2021, circuses with animals were LEGAL!

>>2393162
Maybe for the one vegan on this board it would be lol. Run over those piggies I want to eat some bacon.

>>2393169
Well, if you can tell me, why animals and nature are the oppressors of humans, then go ahead (assuming it's not a joke).

File: 1752790158788.png (14.95 KB, 537x535, ClipboardImage.png)

We need the excise all misanthropes from the left. They are just basically fascists, possibly even worse depending on how you look at it.

>>2393169
I will remove your gut biome and feed you PFAS

>>2393076
implicit socialism = continuing actions bred of poverty

File: 1752790771046-0.png (2.81 MB, 1440x1424, megalania.png)

File: 1752790771046-1.jpg (1.17 MB, 6300x2850, aim0ugwoczm11.jpg)

There will be no zoos. All the animals will roam the earth along humans in cooperation and respect. Advanced communist technology will bring back megafauna and we will repopulate the planet with Gigantopithecuses, Titanoboases and Megalodons.

>>2393174
When we were hunter gatherers the poisonous flora killed us and the animals that are us oppressed us from being free to benefit from our labor. The weather also would destroy our labor during storms or droughts.

>>2393193
>When we were hunter gatherers the poisonous flora killed us and the animals that are us oppressed us from being free to benefit from our labor. The weather also would destroy our labor during storms or droughts.
Not only that but animals to this day steal the fruits of our labor.

>>2392953
Actually, Marx wrote a bit about how human metabolism is linked to machinery and the extractive nature of capitalism.

IMO the capitalists feeds us a meat-heavy fatty diet simply because that makes for short-term better workers. It is the grueling pressures of capitalism which force the workers into an environmental devastating diet. We eat a lot of pigs for the same sort of reasons that we mine a lot of coal.

There is a bit of awkwardness here. Capital often suppresses forms of technology which are hard to monetize. Water-power mills were better than coal-fueled mills but were very location dependent. The issue with nuclear power is not just that big oil is opposed to nuclear power but that nuclear power is not monetizable in discrete chunks like oil or coal.

IMO the capitalist diet is most unique in that it is composed of commodities. Everything in society is digitized for the unfeeling analysis of market profit.

trees could be made from plastic for all i care if they did what trees do today. that is to say, i don't care about the essential properties of le nature

>>2393216
how dare you suggest thinking about anything other than casually continuing capitalist trends

>>2393193
What you're saying is far from untrue…

>>2393191
Frankly sounds too transhumanistic, at the same time, feels like good idea.

Just look at the comment section of this post. IDK why are they so pissy about the idea of forming a safari park:
https://similarworlds.com/vacation/theme-parks/5350153-I-want-to-have-my-own-theme-park-with-animals-zoo-or

>>2393053
So what fascists usually postulate in regards to animal rights?

File: 1752792392008.png (4.56 MB, 2000x2000, ClipboardImage.png)


>>2393239
I meant, what points do fascists have about animal rights? Like Nazi Hitlerites?

File: 1752792642653.png (733.87 KB, 1024x753, ClipboardImage.png)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_welfare_in_Nazi_Germany

>There was widespread support for animal welfare in Nazi Germany[1] (German: Tierschutz im nationalsozialistischen Deutschland) among the country's leadership. Adolf Hitler and his top officials took a variety of measures to ensure animals were protected.[2]


>Several Nazis were environmentalists, and species protection and animal welfare were significant issues in the Nazi regime.[3] Heinrich Himmler made an effort to ban the hunting of animals.[4] Hermann Göring was a professed animal lover and conservationist,[5] who threatened to commit Germans who violated Nazi animal welfare laws to concentration camps.[5] In his private diaries, Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels described Hitler as a vegetarian who was contemptuous of Judaism and Christianity for the ethical distinction they drew between the value of humans and the value of animals;[6][5] Goebbels also mentions that Hitler planned to discourage slaughterhouses in the German Reich following the conclusion of World War II.[6] The Nazi government made a law against animal testing but in practice animal testing was permitted and even encouraged in Nazi Germany.[7][8][9]


>At the end of the nineteenth century, kosher butchering and vivisection (animal experimentation) were the main concerns of the German animal welfare movement. The Nazis adopted these concerns as part of their political platform.[11] According to Boria Sax, the Nazis rejected anthropocentric reasons for animal protection—animals were to be protected for their own sake.[12] In 1927, a Nazi representative to the Reichstag called for actions against cruelty to animals and kosher butchering.[11]


>In 1931, the Nazi Party (then a minority in the Reichstag) proposed a ban on vivisection, but the ban failed to attract support from other political parties. By 1933, after Hitler had ascended to the Chancellery and the Nazis had consolidated control of the Reichstag, the Nazis immediately held a meeting to enact the ban on vivisection. On April 21, 1933, almost immediately after the Nazis came to power, the parliament began to pass laws for the regulation of animal slaughter.[11] On April 21, a law was passed concerning the slaughter of animals; no animals were to be slaughtered without anesthetic.


>Göring also banned commercial animal trapping and imposed severe restrictions on hunting. He prohibited boiling of lobsters and crabs. In one incident, he sent a fisherman to a concentration camp for cutting up a bait frog.[13][citation needed]


>On February 23, 1934, a decree was enacted by the Prussian Ministry of Commerce and Employment which introduced education on animal protection laws at primary, secondary and college levels.[19] In 1934, Nazi Germany hosted an international conference on animal welfare in Berlin.[20] On March 27, 1936, an order on the slaughter of living fish and other poikilotherms was enacted. On March 18 the same year, an order was passed on afforestation and on protection of animals in the wild.[19] On September 9, 1937, a decree was published by the Ministry of the Interior which specified guidelines for the transportation of animals.[21] In 1938, the Nazis introduced animal protection as a subject to be taught in public schools and universities in Germany.[20]

>>2393245
Duh… some folks tell me I'm evil, because I want to interact with animals, even exotic animals and allow people to pet them.
Tell me what is so "anti'animal'rights about it.

>>2393245
So, TL;DR in fact Nazi German regime that occupied Poland was a ecofascist regime? Nowadays lulz, there are tendencies like this on WEF and UN or PETA organisations.

>>2393245
>>2393244
Nazis thought nature was oppressive, had a cult for science and thought humans were in struggle against nature which is exactly the positition of some "communists" here

>>2393260
Sources?

>>2393261
Johann Chapoutot


>>2393269
Yeah who care about scientific history, glowiepedia said hitler loved dogs and hated meat so we must eat the dogs

>>2393280
you got a problem with eating dogs?

>>2393282
Depends on how hungry I am

>>2393282
Yes, and I'll kill anyone eating dogs.

>>2393280
>Yeah who care about scientific history, glowiepedia said hitler loved dogs and hated meat so we must eat the dogs
You haven't even provided proof this random french guy even said what he said, and what are his sources?

>>2393290
try it whitey, i'll eat you too.

White people apparently also eat bears and lions e.g. Ted Nugent.

File: 1752794822461-0.png (3.09 MB, 2161x1513, ClipboardImage.png)

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/343091

Things You Never Knew About Nature-Loving Himmler

>According to Himmler, you had to ban vivisection in order to "awaken and strengthen the spirit of compassion as one of the highest moral values ​​of the German people." A Himmler proud to define the German people as "the only one in the world to have a decent attitude towards animals."


>This most zealous murderer of a children 's story even wrote a book of fairy tales, in which rats unearthed in the homes of the Germans are not killed, but taken to court for trial, "treated with humanity."


>On Himmler's wall hung approved guidelines for the transport of animals and he hosted international conferences on animal protection in Berlin. Himmler promulgated a regulation for the slaughter of fish and other cold-blooded animals. Himmler once asked his physician, a well known hunter: "How can you, you, Dr. Kersten, enjoy shooting from a shelter at the defenseless creatures that roam the forest, unable to protect themselves and free from all suspicion? It is' a real crime . Nature is tremendously beautiful and every animal has the right to live "


>Himmler hated tobacco, which he defined "lung masturbation". The Reichsführer who urged his soldiers not to show pity in shooting and gassing women and children , banned smoking not only among his SS, but also in many workplaces, government offices, hospitals and on trains and buses of the city.


>Himmler hated hunting and called it "a crime against innocent human beings killed in cold blood." It is the same Himmler who sponsored the medical experiments in the extermination camps.


>According to Himmler's racist belief, “native species” originate in a certain place and that is where they “belong.” In similar terms, according to Himmler's heirs,


<in the West and in the Islamic world, Israel’s “colonization” threatens the “original” Arab environment (a bending of the facts, as the Jews are the indigenous people of Israel). In Iran's Himmlerian rethoric, Israel is a "rotten tree".

Lol the spin they had to put at the end.

IDF loudly and proudly proclaims itself "the most vegan army in the world."

>>2393245
>wikipedia is full of glowies
>glowies love whitewashing nazis
<when wikipedia says nazis liked environment i must take it at full face value
lmao people here


>>2393320
<can't refute the sourced information

>>2393322
wikipedia is not a source

BOONS IN ZOOS

>>2393254
Environmentalism is Nazism

>>2393334
World war 2 was like the most polluting event in history

>>2393334
Wouldn't disagree.

>>2393323
It is sourced.

>>2393321
https://news.uoguelph.ca/2014/04/historian-uncovers-nazi-animal-laws/
>By 1935, additional restrictions on hunting protected some animals, such as wolves. “What is interesting is that wolves were already extinct in Germany at that time,” Piper points out. “Wolves did exist in Poland, though, and I think this law showed that the Nazis were already looking across their borders and planning to take over.”

>However, in Poland the laws were used in a different way. The Nazis chose areas of land and designated them as nature preserves for animals such as wolves and beavers. The people living on these parcels of land were forcibly removed and sent to death camps.

File: 1752797846177.png (234.86 KB, 400x503, ClipboardImage.png)

>In a radio broadcast om August 28 1933 hr told the German nation “An absolute and permanent ban on vivisection is not only a necessary law to protect animals and to show sympathy with their pain, but it is also a law for humanity itself…. I have therefore announced the immediate prohibition of vivisection and have made the practice a punishable offense in Prussia. Until such time as punishment is pronounced the culprit shall be lodged in a concentration camp”

File: 1752798156330-0.png (244.86 KB, 1080x1628, Chinazi.png)

File: 1752798156331-1.png (345.27 KB, 1080x2049, Xitler.png)

What should be done about the chinese fourth reich



>However, in Poland the laws were used in a different way. The Nazis chose areas of land and designated them as nature preserves for animals such as wolves and beavers. The people living on these parcels of land were forcibly removed and sent to death camps.

Yeah, yeah, they treated us Poles as subhumans for such animal lovers. BTW not all animal lovers aren't serial killers like popular stereotype goes.

>>2393216
>MO the capitalists feeds us a meat-heavy fatty diet…
Most foods (Including under capitalism) are based off plants, like wheat, soy, rice and corn. Also, fat was never the real villain, sugar is but sugar lobbyists covered this up.


bump

Nationalize them all and make them state property. Implement a central planning committee for all animals and house pets.

>>2393861
How would it have to look like? Elaborate.

>>2393866
You pass a law declaring all flora, fauna, rivers, and wildlife to be state property. House pets will be considered leases which can be passed down, inherited, traded but are still de facto state property, which can be repo'd if the animal is abused. You have a committee (or series of committees) set up to manage wildlife and another one for domesticated animals, cattle etc. These should be staffed by educated ecologists who will set environmental policies and take care of managing animals and wildlife and given an annual budget for doing this and the power to cull invasive species, manage the environment, carry out wildlife surveillance and monitoring of endangered species or zoonotic diseases. If you have a huge territory, you could federalize this so each state could have its wildlife and nature agency which is underneath a national body. This allows for better localized management of territories that's tailored for each region's terrain. You could also fund this by partially allowing these agencies to collect revenue from national parks, zoos, fishing and hunting licenses etc. and the agency for managing cattle and farm animals could take a slice of agricultural profits alongside any funds it gets from the national treasury. This would give them a level of independence so they won't be fucked over by a Trump style retard. Zoos will have to stay. For better or worse, they have become essential to preserving endangered species and reintroducing animals back into wildlife and for zoology generally. With this system, you can also ensure a steady stream of good jobs for zoologists, ecologists, climate scientists, volcanologists, and opportunities for fieldwork for academic researchers which will lead to better practice.


Unique IPs: 24

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]