[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


File: 1752824681792-0.png (1.15 MB, 1080x1093, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1752824681792-1.png (224.83 KB, 1080x1111, ClipboardImage.png)

 

ITS JOEVER. REFORM HAS WON. TOTAL BRITAIN LOSS.
I HOPE YOU BRITISH FAGS ENJOY THE ONE PARTY REFORM STATE.
AHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHA CLOWN WORLD AHHAAH
(unironically this is a pretty grim situation)

us after them

>>2393677
There is no fundamental distinction between Labour and Reform.
Well, Reform might Orbanize things a bit, making it harder for them to lose office, but this country is already governed by a press-politician-private-public-parasite coalition which destroyed Corbyn [duh], Johnson [got too big for his boots], Truss [retarded, but still overthrown], and Sunak [as a punishment beating for the Tories] just to shitehouse Starmer into office, so that's not really a big practical change.
They could scrap devolution, I guess, which would be horrible and miserable for Scotland and Wales and probably start a war in NI, but England's never given a fuck about them anyway, and the precedent has already been set by Sunak vetoing a bunch of devolved legislation on spurious grounds and Starmer leaving those vetoes in place.

Equally, they might not. It isn't inconceivable that the British state is simply ungovernable. That Reform will sweep to victory and then continue literally the exact same policies as before, maybe with some token social reaction here and there - which Starmer's already delivered in spades, but once more with feeling.

>>2393685
so nothing ever happens…

>slightly more right party takes the pairlament
riveting. this constitutes fascism btw

>>2393686
oh things happen all the time in Britain: they get a little bit worse, day-by-day.

>>2393687
you joke but this is actually what happened in 2024.

File: 1752832830144.png (348.18 KB, 465x279, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2393677
That Corbyn number looks good though. If Corbyn actually goes through with the new party project, he could potentially [maybe] overtake and destroy the labour party.

reform is tory-lite, so nothing would change

>>2393735
my cynic side says his party will just become labour 2.0

That would be worth being stressed about if Labor wasnt basically the same party already.
I'm no nihilist/relativist but really i fail to see any difference besides more (performative) anti-brown rethorics from Reform.
It's the same incompetent austerity toxic sludge with the same anti-trans (not performative) policies.
Conservative Weimarian politics by our parasitic "EHC" who have turned what was a real country with real prople into an ugly economic zone populated by cattles that cant create culture anymore.

By the way the UK is really the proof that eugenicists and Richard Banania EHC types are full of hot hair. Socially progressive elitist types, too.
"EHC" have ruled this country alone for a 100 years and turned everything to shit no matter what worldview you can have.
Who is this "country" for by that point? It look like it is being mutated to accomodate cosmopolitan 65yo radfem Guardian columnists alone. Even Hitler 2 would be a historical progress to wathever we are doing now.

>>2393735
I hope so but the left is too effeminate, unambitious and demoralized to do anything that matter. Which is why fAsIcSm or anything similar isnt in fact coming back. There is no strong forward thiking left to crush, thete isnt even violent leftist terrorism, kaput.

>>2393677
Beautliful situation.

What's wrong with scots? Why are they projected to vote libdems? Burger here btw.

>>2394637
SNP is collapsing, they lost the referendum and now have no real reason to exist

>>2393677
Reform will split into two parties before the next election or just after it after doing entryism via the poorly vetted new MPs. There is a second more radical faction led by Rupert Lowe that has been quietly building up support and infrastructure that hasn't broke cover yet.
Then we can have the absolute banter timeline of five parties on ~16% in a two party system.

>>2394731
So I guess the Scots have finally been totally cucked by the English? Is this what William Wallace would've wanted?

>>2394637
>>2394731
>>2394835
The problem with Scottish and to some extent Welsh nationalism is that it's incredibly weak civnat regionalism basically used to claw devolution out from Westminster or in Scotland's case get in on EU bennies. The SNP have no way to force a referendum and if you're an actual nationalist you'll see the absolute state of ROI and EU and decide the English nationalist revolt is probably a safer bet.
And if you're not there for the nationalism you could say the SNP are more progressive than the alternatives, but Sturgeon is gone now so it's basically just Neo-Blairites who want to drive the country off a cliff by cutting themselves off from the UK and going through a grueling intermediate period of trying to join the EU.
Like, who actually likes larping this much just to swap Westminster for Brussels? Not exactly the Irish civil rights movement, is it?

>>2393677
election is like 4 years away. why are you panicking?

>>2394874
Panicans except British.

>>2394904
Trust the Planican
Of course I trust the plan, I can


Unique IPs: 15

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]