>"But after all, my dear friends, does Bolshevism exist in Russia? It does not any longer. There are no longer councils of the factories, but dictators of the factories; no longer eight hours of work, but twelve; no longer equal salaries, but thirty-five different categories, not according to need, but according to merit. There is not in Russia even that liberty which there is in Italy. Is there a dictatorship of the proletariat? No! Is there a dictatorship of the Socialists? No! There is a dictatorship of a few intelligent men, not workmen, who belong to a section of the Socialist Party, and their dictatorship is opposed by all other sections. This dictatorship of a few men is what is called Bolshevism. Now we do not want this in Italy."
Was he right?
>>2403942He never wrote that did he? I don't recall him giving shits about salaries and he always preferred organic meritocracy over democracy anytime.
Neither writing anything against bolshevism although its true what is written since bolshevik comes from <<большинство́>> (the majority) but it only referred to the majority within the party on the vote that determined the minority that was called mensheviks from ме́ньше (the lesser / the minority) and such.
Searching this weird text doesn't show up anything.
>>2403942knew it was ᴉuᴉlossnW once i got to
>There is a dictatorship of a few intelligent menbecause that's just great man theory with extra steps
>>2404708https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mis%C3%A8re_de_la_philosophieuhhh
there are also english translation of the work translating it as misery because y'know misery and poverty mean the same
Unique IPs: 13