Adulthood is realizing that Stalin was right about basically everything (except maybe pissing his pants when the Nazis invaded and giving bad military orders, but in the end the Fash chuds were defeated and you can't fault the man for not being both a political and military genius)
/leftypol/, suggest to me good reading material for red pilling people about /ourguy/ Stalin
Kulaks/Uyghas/Zionists fuck off
254 posts and 21 image replies omitted.>>2420186>If lead by false consciousness, easy enough with Stalin hogging up the party.They aren't false for not following your personal desired line, the purges happened under lenin, and happened under stalin, many of the targets were pointed by the working class or by Old bolsheviks themselves, will or nill, denial wonth change that, Old bolsheviks or not.
>Yet being a menshevik is according to Stalin.Like Trotsky and great majority of his line got Purged ?, if that's the case then Lenin in itself was building false counciousness for letting Them in in the first place.
>>2420190>In England, France, and Belgium, where the bourgeoisie rules, the communists still have a common interest with the various democratic parties, an interest which is all the greater the more closely the socialistic measures they champion approach the aims of the communists – that is, the more clearly and definitely they represent the interests of the proletariat and the more they depend on the proletariat for support. In England, for example, the working-class Chartists are infinitely closer to the communists than the democratic petty bourgeoisie or the so-called Radicals.
>In America, where a democratic constitution has already been established, the communists must make the common cause with the party which will turn this constitution against the bourgeoisie and use it in the interests of the proletariat – that is, with the agrarian National Reformers.
>In Switzerland, the Radicals, though a very mixed party, are the only group with which the communists can co-operate, and, among these Radicals, the Vaudois and Genevese are the most advanced.
>In Germany, finally, the decisive struggle now on the order of the day is that between the bourgeoisie and the absolute monarchy. Since the communists cannot enter upon the decisive struggle between themselves and the bourgeoisie until the bourgeoisie is in power, it follows that it is in the interest of the communists to help the bourgeoisie to power as soon as possible in order the sooner to be able to overthrow it. Against the governments, therefore, the communists must continually support the radical liberal party, taking care to avoid the self-deceptions of the bourgeoisie and not fall for the enticing promises of benefits which a victory for the bourgeoisie would allegedly bring to the proletariat.https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm#6.1is this included in your "invariant" line?
look at this thread for the past hour and tell me this isnt a raid and mindless attempt at shitflinging with no regard for post quality
it starts here
>>2419884>>2419078>"revolution in one nation"it was called socialism in one country and it was not a goal in and of itself but a policy that arose out of geopolitical necessity after the failure of the german revolution to happen in 1919 and the isolation of the USSR in a capitalist world.
This is what the USSR had to deal with between WW1 and Stalin's death:
<WW1 leaves Russia less developed than it was before WW1<there is 2 revolutions in 1 years<bolsheviks take power<civil war where western powers invade with a coalition of 14 countries<country is now even more fucked<need to do things like "war communism" and "NEP" just to stay afloat<german revolution fails<internal power struggle in the party all through the 20s<rapid industrialization and purges through the 30s<climate-caused famine in ukraine which gets called a man made famine by bourgeois propagandists<purges of military officials just before nazi germany invades<operation barbarossa almost reaches moscow and kills hundreds of thousands<win WW2 but come out of it a lot weaker<Western capitalists put up iron curtain but blame you for it<capitalist ailgned countries get that juicy marshall plan money but you have to refuse it because it comes with strings attached (like privatization) Unique IPs: 16