/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

The consequences of the war on drugs that stands as a global economic system for intentionally created crime have been those of decreasing the productive forces of the proletariat and instead criminalizing the work of the proletariat turning them into lumpens and petite-bourgeoisie mafias which correspond with the same bourgeoisie governments that deem them unlawful in the first place. That is that the government works with them and through them utilizing their criminal character to carry out its own unlawful activities through them instead of directly doing so. Legalization means the bourgeoisie governments taking responsibility for themselves and ceasing to reduce the reserve army of labor and the workers by arrests and penalties while also ceasing to criminalize them and thus declass them when the merit of their work ultimately is beneficial and even necessary towards developing the productive forces, as scientific development entails the necessary production of use values from the fields of botany and chemistry.
The "AES" bourgeoisie governments are complicit in pragmatic criminality by adhering to the United Nations drug laws, conventions and the UNODC which have entirely originated out of United States policy and spread throughout the world. For example, americanophile Hu Jintao was the one to approve the criminal - crime creating anti-drug laws to be passed in China http://www.npc.gov.cn/zgrdw/englishnpc/Law/2009-02/20/content_1471610.htm to punish its own citizens for any decision to partake in their drug of choice whereas other detrimental and harmful drugs (nicotine, tobacco and alcohol) have been presented to them as legal alternatives thus encouraging them to use the more damaging options than the illegal ones whether they are more beneficial or not. There is no original research provided in any of the decisions made in that example, it is just United States foreign policy seeing its implementation worldwide. The imperial core continues to make itself exempt from its own law, where the rest of the bourgeois nations continue to be influenced by this global economic system of intentionally created crime called the war on drugs. It is also detrimental to public perception, knowledge and scientific development as the misinformation is so vast it has created taboos around the discussion of drugs which stigmatizes users and advocaries who are in the necessary line of the development of botany and chemistry as part of scientific development, whereas their opposition which makes up the vast majority of the people affected by false consciousness and anti-drug propaganda are founded in conservativism, reactions and religious metaphysical abstractions and dogma that are a greater mental illness than any of the claims they make about drug induced mental illness and deserve the attention of alienists.
What must be cleared is this, drugs are not a "harm", drugs encompass all of medicine, enhancements of cognition by recreational use and misuse that is dubbed abuse. Anyone simplifying these three characteristics down to "medicine or abuse" is a liar who rejects countless and ongoing dossiers of evidence of recreational drug use improving productivity and leading to a better life when persons are educated enough to manage their use properly. This goes for all drug categories that can be determined to have positive reception.

Now back to the title, a strategy that could work would be seeking asylum in foreign embassies on the basis of persecution over drug use, in peculiar the foreign embassy of Uruguay would be a choice. The idea is to first start with cannabis which has the largest base of users after nicotine, tobacco and alchohol by seeking asylum to distribute and consume cannabis on the grounds of the foreign embassy of Uruguay for the nation thus to test whether or not the Uruguayan government will fall under the pressure to repress cannabis users once more or force the others to cease to repress the users. Organizations would need to heed. The premise is simple, anti-drug laws in the nations do not apply to foreign embassies since foreign embassies follow the laws of their own respective bourgeoisie dictatorship. Thus anything that can be deemed an offense within the bourgeoisie dictatorship with anti-drug laws in technicality is not an offense on the foreign embassy of Uruguay's soil. This can function for other nations which allow all handling of cannabis for recreational purposes. When enough people have occupied the embassies in the pretext of seeking refuge from the draconian anti-drug laws (which on technicality will have to be seeking political asylum) then they can apply pressure to their local bourgeoisie dictatorships to cease the anti-drug laws by also applying pressure to the Uruguayan government (or others). In the worst case scenario the Uruguayan government will show its hypocrisy and remove the persons from the embassy soil giving them to local authorities, thus showing its barbaric continuation of anti-drug laws persecuting drug users despite cannabis being legal recreationally and thus cause destabilization.
Another choice for a foreign embassy to occupy and make demands (it is protesting, it is reforms, but it is beneficiary to the productive forces and the health of the proletariat and the reserve army of labor) would be Canada.