[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


File: 1754914295433.jpg (58.21 KB, 653x499, 7m03xu 2.jpg)

 

You're not using the tools given to create democratic communism.
That is a mistake.
There id nothing infantile about democratic communism with blockchains snd ai.
To think otherwise just makes you seem rigid and doctrine and not realistic.
Like yours just an atheist christian instead of a marxist that is progressive that is rooted on materialist science.

Wrong audience.

Sounds good imo.

Pointless thread without any real arguments besides "you're wrong and I'm right".
Fuck off please.

>blockchains
why the sarcasm? There is certainly actual tech that people are ignoring, we're right to ignore pyramid schemes, but sleeping on actually stuff like permaculture is shortsighted.

>>2428097
Blockchain just meanx a server that nobody owns.
Perfect use case fof a system where people fear centralized abuse.

>>2428238
You'll be interested to know China uses one for the Digital Renminbi and a few other systems I think

>>2428244
Oh neat. I'll bookmark the wikipedia for it and look into it. They must've figured how to do it without the pitfalls that crypto falls into.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_renminbi

>>2427877
You are being completely ignorant, scientific socialism is against any decentralization because this is a fantasy of the parasitic petty bourgeoisie or failed bourgeoisie, multipolarism is only accepted so that the proletariat can acquire political supremacy to nationalize all banks and initiate expropriations, nationalizations and socializations to abolish private property, social classes of owners and the anarchy of production to then acquire self-sufficiency to produce everything nationally, acquiring financial, technological and food sovereignty with its own industry and for this to be facilitated it is necessary to avoid the sanctions that will come to hinder this process, but remembering that the object of communists is the eventual global socialist hegemony and not some fantasy of decentralization or market freedom.

>>2428510
>scientific socialism is against any decentralization
Scientific socialism isn't some magical superstition you can paint things with to make them simpler. Some technologies are outright absurd to centralize for material reasons. Blockchains are questionable / bad / barely even count as a decentralization method, but imagine if RSS feeds were all one websit- oh wait that's twitter, and we saw what twitter became, right? Same with email, opengraph, https, any data serialization standard, etc…

>>2428238
>Perfect use case fof a system where people fear centralized abuse.
so voting? electronic direct democracy where we can spin up a new block each time we have a voting session so people all effectively have one-time-use encrypted and verified voting panels?

and AI that might be good at directing us towards things we're interested in voting on so we don't have to wade through every bill just to find things?

>>2428612
Yes thats what i think


Unique IPs: 9

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]