I fully support universal healthcare, universal suffrage, free education, minimum wage social security for those in vulnerable conditions, even the seizing of the means of production so workers could actually turn industries and companies into cooperatives
What I DON'T support however is infesting our once developed, secure and beautiful first world nations with undesirable subhumans from the third world, and especially as a straight man myself I don't want to risk getting a stone thrown to my head by some Muhammad or Nbumgo because their brownoid shithole religion says straight people bad or something, my city (Frankfurt) used to be the JEWEL of Germany when it was racially homogeneous now it's a hellhole thanks to the uyghurs and arqbs infesting it
In fact, in these elections I actually voted AfD despite them being neoliberal crooks, because they're the ONLY ONES willing to do something about the non-White infestation
TL/DR I fully support the economic policies of communism but I want shitskins OUT, they're ugly, smelly, barbaric and a threat to my existance as a straight man(Rule 14g - racebait)
>>2435596I think that a group should give aid to it's weak members but I don't think they should give aid to a separate group of people.
Correct.
Otherwise it leads to pathologically weak groups of people (browns) leeching off of strong groups of people (whites).
>>2435643>"Who say's it's only yours" says the scheming nog as he looks at your possessions.>>2435642I have a question.
Do you think the jews are doing good today?
>>2435663What do you live in the forest?
You don't own any property?
If I just showed up at your location and started taking your things that would be cool?
I think I should start by taking that computer you're using right now that you don't own.
>>2435669So you're a naked homeless man using a computer in a public library right now?
I don't get it.
>>2435673>immiserated wage worker<homeless?
>I don't get it.if even these concepts are too much for your pea sized brain you might be mentally disabled
>>2435677"For most personal property (movable objects like furniture, electronics, and other possessions), a formal deed is not required to establish legal ownership. Ownership can be transferred through other means, such as a bill of sale, a simple written agreement, or even just by physical possession and payment.
For example, when you buy a book from a bookstore, the exchange of money for the book is enough to transfer ownership. There is no legal deed involved. However, for a high-value or unique item, a written receipt or a bill of sale can serve as important proof of ownership."
TLDR you don't need a legal deed to legally own something but the deed can be used in a court to prove ownership when the ownership is contested but it is not required.
>>2435680Not sure why.
>>2435579>What I DON'T support however is infesting our once developed, secure and beautiful first world nations with undesirable subhumans from the third worldThey were never beautiful, you just lived in a decent area.
>I don't want to risk getting a stone thrown to my head by some Muhammad or Nbumgo because their brownoid shithole religion says straight people bad or somethingMost religions enforce heterosexuality, so I don't see what your issue is.
>my city (Frankfurt) used to be the JEWEL of Germany when it was racially homogeneous now it's a hellhole thanks to the uyghurs and arqbs infesting itYou're petty-bourgeois.
>In fact, in these elections I actually voted AfD despite them being neoliberal crooks, because they're the ONLY ONES willing to do something about the non-White infestationThey'll just deport people which doesn't actually get to the root of the problem, the economy will still suck no matter what.
>freeze peachNo one is censoring you and you're not under attack, all the large corporations are pandering to you.
>>2435689>they were never beautifulThe fuck is this delusion.
>the economy will still suckUh what? How would that even be possible we're white we have the ability to create value.
>No one is censoring you and you're not under attackLol what. I can't say this in public I have to say it on an anonymous forum.
>all the large corporations are panderingThey all support LGQBTQ+ and browns because they think it makes them look hip and will increase their profits.
>>2435720…And?
>why immigration will never stopAnd?
>>2435700No but whites are ingenious and industrious, so they have good countries.
Browns are the opposite and their countries reflect that.
>>2435714>germany will go extinct without migrantsThis doesn't make sense.
Germany will go extinct IF they import browns.
>>2435720But it doesn't matter.
If you import browns you kill the country.
Would you rather have a country with a smaller population or a brown population?
A brown population provides no value to the world and makes the country worse.
>immigration will never stopThis doesn't make sense either. There's no rule that says a country must either keep their population numbers steady or increase them.
There's nothing wrong with having a country with less people in it.
>>2435728The kid clearly doesn't care if the world turns into brown shit, I'm the one that cares.
>>2435730You truly are an illiterate retard because you don't even know what an ad hominem actually is. Protip: it's not just insults in a vacuum.
My first post is
>>2435704. Communism is not about defending poorer bourgeois nation-states or essentializing this or another race, by the way!
>>2435579>Deez subhumans grrrrThan stop being a cuck for bourgeois interests, simple as bucko
I'm not gonna molly coddle you like a classical liberal nor spergout like a red liberal
You sound fascist or at least reactionary, here's an idea…go harder on the capitalist class. Who has the incentive to hire cheap labor be it exporting jobs or importing hires?
Your culture, race, religion means fuck all to me. But I like you, need work, need purpose, need money to survive. We ain't gonna get those things with capitalism. This isn't rocket science.
>>2435739That was a gay guy, I'm a straight guy with the same opinions as him.
>>2435757I'm not sure of the core tenets of fascism, but I am an elitist and I find non-whites to be dysgenic and not valuable or conducive to an optimal world.
(Reactionary) Didn't read your post yet, just going off your dogshit picture, the implication of which is:
>look we built le epic buildings in africa
<then they just came here to be homeless
First of all, you didn't build shit. Somebody in the past did and you merely take some abstract collective pride in your race identity so the glory of past atrocities can somehow trick down to you in the form of spooky race credit. "I lack melanin and am descended from Europeans, therefore I built all those marble statues and played all those harpsichords and wore all those powdered wigs and did all those epic colonizations to enrich all those subhumans through my superior civilizational megamind" is basically the entire mindset being embodied by your retarded pic
But what happened in reality? Who were these epic buildings built for? Somebody in the past (not you) built a colonial administrative building to coordinate the reallocation of a colony's natural resources from a peripheral colonized region to an imperial metropole. So those resources were gotten primarily for the enrichment and betterment of the colonizers, not the colonized. The humanitarian rhetoric is a veneer. And after the colonizers colonized them and left them destitute and destabilized many of them, reasonably enough, migrated to the regions of the globe where the wages purchase more, where commodities were cheaper, where industrialization had already taken place rather than languish in what they had been left with. After all, it is much harder to bootstrap your own industrialization when foreigners own your mines and decide what to do with your metals. It doesn't come down to some kind of genetic inability to industrialize. If it did the CIA wouldn't have needed to assassinate postcolonial leaders who tried to gain independence from colonial regimes and to establish self sufficiency. Which is the other path. The path not taken by those who migrate to the imperial core. The path taken by those who do try to languish in what the colonizers left them.
Just understand that somewhere along the line, the reason you got immigrants is because people in the past destabilized and looted the world. And you neither get the blame for the atrocities, nor the glory for the heroics. You need to conceive of things as a system of which you are a mere node. You do not inherit automatically any kind of virtue or vice just because people in the past with a similar appearance to you did or didn't do certain things.
Now let's look at your post… and predictably it's dogshit!
>What I DON'T support however is infesting our once developed, secure and beautiful first world nations with undesirable subhumans from the third world
Have you ever considered it is you, not them, who lack humanity? Since you feel the need to dehumanize them? Something you don't even do to your own household pets, who you go out of your way to humanize?
>>2437703How can they be queer if they conformed to the gender roles of their culture? They weren't something transgressive, isn't queer a modern concept?
And what does this have to do with anything the treatlerite homofash said?
>>2437840Yeah, there are trans people that aren't queer, the same for homosexuals, I am gay but there is nothing queer about me.
>>2437770Free speech is a liberal concept that must be opposed. You mustn't be free to fill leftypol with your shit.
>>2437845Maybe mods should appoint temporarily more people to watch the threads? Since they are sleeping or something
>>2437701JUNGLE GANG
JUNGLE IS MASSIVE
>>2437849>Yeah, there are trans people that aren't queer, the same for homosexuals, I am gay but there is nothing queer about me.yes i agree. would you also say that gay marriage and adoption is the ultimate heteronormative gesture?
>free speech should be opposedi would suggest reading marx on this issue:
>The press in general is a realisation of human freedom. Consequently, where is a press there is freedom of the press [.] Freedom is so much the essence of man that even its opponents implement it while combating its reality; they want to appropriate for, themselves as a most precious ornament what they have rejected as an ornament of human nature. No man combats freedom; at most he combats the freedom of others. Hence every kind of freedom has always existed, only at one time as a special privilege, at another as a universal right.https://marxists.architexturez.net/archive/marx/works/1842/free-press/ch04.htmto limit speech in law is only to make freedom exclusive to a particular class, not to regulate the content of speech as such. as the old question goes, "who decides, and for what purpose?"
>>2437927Absolutely
Again people don't understand what they're askihg for. If mods actually start banning people left and right to improve quality of the site (or attempting to) anons here would be the first to cry foul about shitty mod clique censoring everyone (which happened in pol with rapeape's clique)
>>2437938a lot of people also miss the fact that the law isnt a moral concept. in common understanding, there is a separation between the civil and legal spheres. so, if you are rude, you behave immorally, but not illegally. what i see with police is that they often demand respect, when they are not owed it, leading to a conflation between the civil and legal (which is in effect, a totalitarian formula, where the private becomes public). censors treat things this way too, where improper speech is sought to be made illegal rather than simply denoted as immoral.
>>2437949yes they are, because i am a great contributor to this site so shouldnt be lumped in with the trolls. the trolls should have their own corner, while everyone else has theirs.
Unique IPs: 33