[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


File: 1755574326419.png (759.5 KB, 769x1100, ClipboardImage.png)

 

Without being self-destructive is the way to do it.
The longer a self-destructive mode of production has control over the means of production - the closer to annihilation the productive forces are.
Do an estimate and calculate the maximum lifespan and this is how much time is left before its too late.
My estimate is ≈120 years on its natural course (without experiencing changes), what's yours?

if communism has to be worldwide and is impossible in one country then socialists states are in a holding pattern while they wait for you to overthrow your own bourgeoisie. The required productive forces for defense of the revolution is always relative to the external forces that seek to overthrow it.

Development of the productive forces is already done. The context of those statements was to develop the proletariat out of the shadows of serfdom, which has already been the case globally for many, many years. Marx did not write down that we have to wait for AI intelligent robots before a socialist revolution can occur. Why there hasn't been a successful socialist revolution yet is another topic.

Now, people defending capital try to deny their intention by calling shit neo-colonialism (it's just imperialism stripped of Marxist theory), to justify support of bourgeois-on-bourgeois conflicts, where the proletariat take all the casualties. Their focus on "uplifting" the poor and exploited with economic (liberal) development (dengoids and Africa) is not only impossible, due to the need for the haute bourgeois to protect international profits with cheap labor, but also in defense of utopian, liberal idealism by affirming the theory that if liberalism is hard enough, world happiness will be achieved (but then there's a socialist revolution for no reason, woohoo).

>>2439283
>Development of the productive forces is already done.
Wtf do you mean "its done"? Development isn't something that just has an end point.

China seems to be doing things pretty environmentally now. All those windmills and solar panels are enabling production that made the shit they were doing under oil look like fuckall.

>>2441690
This is why Kaczynski killed himself, he realized how wrong he was when he learned about the glory of China.

File: 1755936367772.png (213.88 KB, 783x640, Manifesto - Ch2 - Marx.png)

>>2439283
>before a socialist revolution can occur
thats not what its about though. development of productive forces happens after the revolution lol you have to have control of the state first

>>2439283
>Development of the productive forces is already done.
wrong. The required productive forces for defense of the revolution is always relative to the external forces that seek to overthrow it. If AES states have to defend themselves from counter revolutionaries, then they are stuck in an arms race with counter revolutionaries. Just because they have enough productive forces to sustain themselves doesn't matter when they live in a world still dominated by capitalism.

Socialists states are in a holding pattern while they wait for you to overthrow your own bourgeoisie.


Unique IPs: 7

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]