[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Not reporting is bourgeois


File: 1755855714980-0.png (125.25 KB, 250x315, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1755855714980-1.png (54.64 KB, 194x259, ClipboardImage.png)

 

Doesnt the success of china show that a mixture of bukharin and stalins ideas work. And that both bukharin and stalin were right and wrong. And that we should take from the good of bukharin and stalin while discarding the bad?

why couldn't Koba and Bukhy just make out and find the common middle ground???

>>2442126
Let's be honest: if they had gotten along and shared power after the mid 1920s, wouldn't they agree to exile the Trot first and if he didn't stop being a prick from Mexico, sent Mercader anyway later?

File: 1755882472584.png (26.61 KB, 681x217, ClipboardImage.png)

It's a shame the Bukharin-Stalin diarchy broke up. Truly the Trump-Musk break up of their era.

>>2442114
>Doesn't the success of making ice cream mean oil and water can mix.
This is genuinely how incomprehensible the statement you just made is. The divide between Stalin and Bukharin wasn't some petty squabble that just needed to be talked out, it was a political and class struggle. Their lines were mutually opposed and Stalin's correct line won over Bukharin's revisionism. That China has developed a massive capitalist economy has nothing to do with either line.

>>2443319
China doesnt have a capitalist economy

>>2442126
Survival of the most ruthless elite instead of worker dictatorship.


>>2442114
>Doesnt the success of china show that a mixture of bukharin and stalins ideas work.
Not really. Stalin represented forced slavery industrialization while Bukharin was more of a continuation of Lenins NEP.

>>2443338
China adopted stalins political ideas. China adopted bukharin economic ideas. Simple as

>>2443323
You should inform China of that then. Not even the CPC claims this.

>>2443319
>The divide between Stalin and Bukharin wasn't some petty squabble that just needed to be talked out, it was a political and class struggle.
wdym? which class was bukharin representing? the nepmen? the wealthier peasants?


Unique IPs: 9

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]